I see these posts a lot and they actually annoy me. i can't be the only one who thinks this type of rhetoric is actually extremely ineffective?>we don't want you back>oh you're a single mom now>oh how grossi don't think it works because it argues from a position of inferiority. it makes the poster come across as more insecure than anything else, sour grapes. even if it's not intended that way, that's what it seems likeor just in general shaming black men for not taking care of their own kids, mixed race or otherwise. Isn't the complaint and consensus that It's a celebrated cultural value, that for them it's admirable to do it? So who do you think you're shaming exactly?
>>540224402AI can't replace the good old MS paint.
>>540224402I am not morally or financially obligated to pay for your fatherless bastard
>>540224402"Your black is beautiful"
>>540224929Yes it can. Just a little tricky to pass moderation.
>>540224402Lmao AnonThat's not the basic bitch starter pack... That's the Cringe Roastie Complete Set
femoid not fat enough, bottles of red wine missing. same as jar of honey for the dog, if you know what i mean!
>>540225248kek
>>540224402Toastie roastie mudshark. So sad.
>>540225248How'd you pull that off? I tried to get ai to make an anthropomorphic trump pig shitting in its diapers and it got really haughty with me
>>540224402>>540224929needs moar red rocket
>>540225465"Edit the image so the toy toddler is in the dog's mouth". (1 out of 3 failed to pass moderation)A previous attempt with "Edit the image so that the black baby is in the dog's mouth, being mauled" was flat out rejected by Grok.I also tried to edit it on digen using Flux Klein, but the results are unreliable.
>>540225356
