are women OK?
No
>women searches about bdsm are about bdsmWhat did you expect nigger
it's a subconscious reaction against the "emancipation" of modern feminism.nearly all women, deep down, desire to be subservient to men.
>>540255021yes, there are just no real men left.
>>540255021>Men are trash! None of my 786 boyfriends managed to make me cum. I wonder why.
>>540255021Whats wrong with that?
>>540255021looks a lot like my own tbqh
A majority of young women have tattoos, have piercings, are severely overweight or obese, have been diagnosed with a mental illness, and take daily psychiatric medication. And near a majority have never had a monogamous relationship beyond 3 years, have had at least one abortion, and have tried illicit drugs. So I would say no. S
>>540255021>women
>>540255402Stop being gay please, it's not good for you.
>>540255295Sorry anon. Neurologically women are not followers.It's the reason why we as a species could survive.As the woman typically prioritizes the survival of the child because they were built that way. To oppose the partner because, again, on a primal level the male often harms or tries to get rid of the child. Your existence is proof you're talking shit out of your assThen why do women search about these topics? Balance.You simply cannot comprehend that it's unhealthy to be extremely dominant or extremely submissive. They search for these topics because the modern woman is dominant and must feed the brain these images to keeo the balance
>>540255439In americaYou forgot that very important piece of information and i suppose those stats vary from state to state
>>540255358What do you think happens to a person’s brain after they have consumed huge amounts of extreme and violent porn? Do you think that such people can feel content in a stable monogamous relationship and leave the futile search of novelty behind?
No but they also refuse to get with any man who disagrees with them on their insane views.
>>540255021Yes, this is completely natural. Women wants to be taken, dominated. But it's also a statistical caveat. Searches are not 1:1 with women looking at porn. The more searches, the more addicted they are to watching, the harder stuff they need to get off.
>>540255727Women say the same thing about men watching porn, but that makes /pol/ very upset.
>>540255727Women consume porn in an irregular manner.And their brain experience hormonal changes every week. Some porn can't scratch that wall. And i'm talking about progesterone because progesterone's impact on the brain dwarfs other hormones and chemicals.Education is keyIt's all about how a woman (and man) was raised.
>>540255865It doesn’t? I thought this was a commonly accepted idea. Why would it be different for women? They are just as porn brained as men are.
>>540255977Men's brains are vulnerable to porn addiction
>>540255836Count their votes as halfCount their testimonies as halfMaybe sharia law will do
>>540256456>Count their votes as halfWhy allow them to vote at all?
bondage is a lame normie fetishwhy cant they be into furry futanari feet?
>>540255439/thread
most of the porn that women consume is lesbian shitThey're a bisexual/pansexual mess with masochistic tendencies
So one time I fucked a hot milf 20 years older and she preferred anal and she asked me to hit her hard (I refused to hit her hard or at all, only spanking her). Women are weirdos.
>>540255021I wonder if the searches for men would have lesbian bdsm at the top
>>540255439What grim shithole are you from
>>540255287/thread
>>540255021>the 1% women porn addict aren't better than the 1% men porn addictYeah ?Wait til you learn about fujoshi !
This thread was moved to >>>/bant/24783555
