[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: maxresdefault.jpg (129 KB, 1280x720)
129 KB JPG
>>
Can we see the so called 'threat' besides a youtube thumbnail?
>>
>>540267216
Kill yourself chink faggot
>>
>>540267137
China are a bunch of pussys. They don’t even have a special forces division because leadership are afraid of mutiny.
>>
File: chink.jpg (12 KB, 210x240)
12 KB JPG
>>540267137
> Kill yourself chink faggot

Yep - correct. OP is probably a Chink Wumao. Responding just keeps their shit up on /pol longer.

KYS Mr Chang
>>
There's very little room in Australia for an open debate about any international issue, the government believes the Australian citizen has no right to have an opinion on international affairs, and that foreign lobby group, DFAT, somehow have the sole right to set Australia's foreign policy. DFAT couldn't put 4 coconuts in a line, and like unions somehow strike worse trade deals then a commercial trader could pick on the spot market.
>>
China presents serious issue for Australia.

Mass Chinese migration, and the pull of China over ethnic han living in Australia, who might be second, third, fourth generation. It's just a constant battle for Australia trying to keep han Chinese loyal. Whatever ground we give them in terms of cultural concession, we lose a hundred fold in terms of influence, and looking to Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, counties who worked this out 500 years ago DFAT totally fucked it.

Next major issue is the strategic reliance on a country which is a strategic threat. They buy our coal, sell us steel. Both are strategic resources. But warships cannot be built with coal and so the simplified risk is that China would rather send 20 steel warships then 20 cargo ships of steel beams. This is why analysts have always pushed for a middle power policy where we effectively refuse to deal with China directly, assainate any Australian business person who does, literally just shoot them in the back of the head, and force the Chinese to trade via Japan who holding the balance of material surplus nobody can invade. The main issue is an unwillingness to commit domestic assassinations, which is a departmental issue.

Third issue is the balance of US arms trade, where the US has fostered dependence by forcing Australia to agrivate the Chinese in exchange for materielle, then withholding the materielle unless we agrivate china further, while they directly occupy us. Because that's US hegemonic policy. The quad killed the triple alliance. If middle powers can't cut the US out, we all get fucked. Quadafi said this, Saddam said this, the issue with middle power theory is the willingness of the US to invade middle powers.
>>
You can't debate this shit because boomers are fucking retarded.

"don't be racist".
Fuck off.
>>
An entire nation descended from criminals stupid enough to be caught in the 1800s when forensic science didn't exist, has no chance against the Han Chinese in any capacity whatsoever. Australia is a pet dog of the West. All it does is bark.
>>
>>540271543
Australia is a glorified US military base with a failing economy. That’s precisely why it is a threat to China.
>>
>>540271589
I'm only seeing 4 people sitting around this table. At least one must go, only one need survive.

Bassi from the ASPI, twiggy forester, whoever headed ADFs response to Albaneses DSR, and the AG.

If you put them in a cell and threw a knife in with them, within an hour Australia's strategic policy position would be resolved because one must go, only one is needed, and cutting off the head is far more effective then the heads of lobby groups would like us to believe.
>>
I don't even think about china
>>
>>540271954
Congrats you're normal
>>
what'r they gonna do?

>nuke an east coast city
kills mostly chinks
>nuke perth
fifo workers and that whole $4 income the country has
>nuke a desert
lol k
>>
China is our last best hope. As the smart people working on their advanced technology become irreplaceable, their authoritarian state will crumble, and we'll get a decent peer state.
It might take another 50 years but its better than nuclear fire.
>>
>>540271013
>>540267137
nixon surrendered the white rice to chinks

it's ogre since 1966 666
>>
>>540273855
Want to know how the USA actually lost hegemony?
It wasn’t a military failure; it was an academic heist pulled off by JFK’s "Best and the Brightest" Whiz Kids.
Robert McNamara brought his Ford Motor Company business-school metrics straight into the Pentagon.
He replaced raw military victory with quantitative management, "systems analysis," and corporate KPIs.

In Vietnam, the PhD Mafia decided that success wasn't about taking territory or breaking the enemy's will.
It was about "Body Counts" and "Kill Ratios"—literally treating a war like a quarterly manufacturing quota.
If the spreadsheet showed a positive statistical trend, the algorithms said we were winning.
Hanoi realized this midwit vulnerability immediately and used it to bleed us dry in a war of attritional mathematics.
McNamara’s corporate formulas literally turned the US military into a blind machine that couldn't see it was losing.

Enter Henry Kissinger, the apex midwit wizard.
Kissinger’s entire worldview was secretly rooted in Rockefeller gommie of the West.
He genuinely launched the West into an irreversible, deterministic civilizational decay.
He psyoped this dark, fatalistic Spenglerian philosophy as a massive psychological operation on Richard Nixon.
He convinced Nixon that the US was a fading empire that couldn't handle a rising, inevitable Asia.

Instead of fighting to win, Kissinger used his "triangular diplomacy" spreadsheet to pivot toward Beijing.
He peddled the lie that opening up to China would contain the Soviets, but it was total academic cope.
He literally engineered the surrender of Western industrial dominance on a silver platter to Beijing.
Sixty years later, China rules global manufacturing because Harvard professors convinced the White House that managed decline was "strategic genius."
>>
>>540267137
>Australia lives under Chinese threat daily
You mean the threat of cheap robust products at low costs and an influx of young attractive Asian cuties? oh no, god help us. /s
>>
>>540274199
enjoy ur death by 1000 chinks
>>
>>540269064
>...they don’t even have special forces
They have special fried rice instead.
>>
>>540274199
>>540273855
Sell out your own people for some flip lussy
>>
>>540274141
Doesn't change much about what I said. I know its popular to be anti-academia right now but thats dumb for a lot of reasons. Using intelligent analysis does work, but vietnam was political. They wanted it to look good on paper because the media was destroying their credibility.
Terms like PHD Mafia make me assume foreign meddling, trying to push white men away from education so they are on a lesser playing field. Jewish tricks even.
Ive yet to meet one person who can tell me why its better to have foreign doctors/lawyers/scientists over white people, except for some vague yakub soul bloat shit.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.