[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: AA29tgkW.jpg (33 KB, 768x435)
33 KB JPG
>The US Department of Defense is formulating a new nuclear strategy for the US, which emphasizes the possibility of using short-range tactical nuclear weapons in the event of a regional war against China or Russia, NBC reported today (Wednesday). The emerging plan will change the nuclear response options that will be presented to the President of the United States during a crisis.

>According to the report, the purpose of the new strategy is to prevent a conventional war from escalating into a nuclear conflict, and to deny the US's adversary any possible advantage in the event of such a conflict. The strategy mainly focuses on possible regional conflicts with Russia and China, which Washington sees as its main nuclear rivals.

>The new program is led by Elbridge Colby, the US Deputy Secretary of Defense for Policy Affairs and one of the most influential figures in the Pentagon. Colby advocates giving a greater role to tactical nuclear weapons, thereby deviating from the current approach, which relies primarily on long-range strategic systems designed to destroy the enemy's nuclear forces.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/pentagon-drafts-new-nuclear-strategy-weighing-tactical-weapons-against-russia-china/ar-AA29t92Z
>>
>>540267955
>the purpose of the new strategy is to prevent a conventional war from escalating into a nuclear conflict, and to deny the US's adversary any possible advantage


Thats not how that works. No nuclear power is going to wait around to see if the second one goes off
>>
>>540267955
We've always done that.
It is necessary.

Neither side will back down.

We could unite the divided factions, but then the global governance would gain too much power.
>>
>>540267955
tangerine tyrant child rapist was banned from using nukes by the SCOUTS. he CANT DO SHIT
>>
File: t.jpg (70 KB, 706x1024)
70 KB JPG
>>540267955
got to end it with a bang, right
>>
>>540267955
Russia will let one of in Ukraine then Israel will let 200 off on Iran.

Calling it now
>>
>>540268225
one can only hope
>>
I don’t care
>>
>>540267955
>use short range nuke on Russia
>dead hand detects launch
>instantly issues launch commands to entire nuclear arsenal

Yea that's good strategy.
>>
When all you got is a hammer . . .
>>
>>540267955
Insider here. Nothing will happen.
Screenshot this.
>>
>>540267955
reminds me of that anon that predicted the future
if hes right, we get in direct war with Russia and China and have nuclear war along the southern border
>>
>>540267955
the orange retard is waving the us military around as carelessly as a nigger with a glock full auto at a convenience store.
what the fuck is wrong with him?
>>
>>540270432
qrd?
>>
File: 1784171118859162m.jpg (74 KB, 760x1024)
74 KB JPG
>>540270719
Time traveller posted this before Argentina lost. But he seemed to know how the jews had rigged the world cup for kikentina.
>>
>>540270719
it was a /x/ post. Some guy drew 9/11 happening as a child, a decade before it happened I think. He had some vision, about nuclear war on American soil, and then aliens/fake alien invasion to kill all survivors.
>>
>>540267955
Putin is a midget queer. He won't do shit because he is a pussy. So is Xi. They are both weak, inferior, and we have no reason to fear them. NEXT.
>>
File: taco-faggot.jpg (86 KB, 635x635)
86 KB JPG
> US is ready to get nuked for the sake of its allies such as SK and Taiwan under TACO command, the most dangerous pussy in US history

Boy, you won't do shit and can't do shit.
>>
>>540267955
Nukes aren't real
>>
>>540267955
Nukes, dinosaurs, and the holocaust are all Jewish myths.
>>
File: 1783438722693858.jpg (46 KB, 900x900)
46 KB JPG
>>540270855
>A time traveler gave his prediction on the World Cup and failed. This MUST mean the jews rigged the World Cup

>>540270868
>Some guy claimed on /x/ that he predicted 911, 20 years after it happened! Given his highly credible track record, we can assume his predictions about the future will be correct!
>>
>>540271098
Dinosaurs were invented by Rockefellers and Morgans to scam college funding money.
>>
>>540267955
>somehow dropping tactical nukes doesn't trigger MAD
it doesn't make sense
>>
>>540271166
Don't forget Big Flintstone Money.
>>
>>540271190
MAD is intended to be a preventative threat. It's not a Newtonian law. If someone actually does drop nukes, there's no cosmic force that compels other nuclear-armed countries to launch their own.
>>
>>540270622
Maybe that's not happening at all. Maybe it's much worse than you think. Who's to say? Niggers tongue my anus.
>>
>>540271299
Because Russia and China wouldn't answer with tactical nukes. Sure
>>
I don't get it. If a US fighter jet or whatever hit Chinese forces with a tactical nuke the obvious response would be to launch ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads on every US base in the region/near China. Then leave it to us if we want to turn it into a full ICBM exchange. There's no way they could allow a nuclear attack to go unanswered or allow US forces to stay around if we're launching nukes. That's just obvious.
>>
>>540271548
You really ought to read up on concepts before attempting to discuss them.
Again, MAD is a concept of PREVENTION. That is, "I should not launch a nuke at another country because there's a risk that it will immediately escalate into our catastrophic destruction." That's it. That's the concept.
You seem to have misinterpreted the concept as: "if a country launches a nuke at another country, other nuclear countries must, by some cosmic insurmountable compulsion, launch nukes at the initial aggressor." This is a child-like misinterpretation.
If the US were to launch nukes AT China or Russia, it is highly likely they will attempt to respond in kind.
If the US were to launch nukes at some non-nuclear shithole, the outcome becomes far less predictable.
>>
>>540267955
Aka "we realized we're fucked so we're nuking the chessboard"
>>
File: 4chan_down.png (429 KB, 465x918)
429 KB PNG
>>540267955
>NBC reported today
Did they also say that the aliens are really demons?
>>
>>540267955
>Elbridge Colby

Any man in power who goes against the what the
McKinsey Consulting Group
says to do, has my attention and respect.
>>
>>540268225
other way around, but yes
>>
File: 6zw6hsvly8w91.jpg (474 KB, 3346x2470)
474 KB JPG
>>540267955
If they cared about war with china, you'd think they would stop them from buying 100% of the real estate in our pacific coast port cities, vast swaths of our farm land, building literal military airstrips on that farm land, and giving 10's of millions of them citizenship through their state sponsored birth tourism. Nah, lets just go straight to nukes.
>>
>>540272773
The reason poor military abd political choices are made that CCP China's military interests, and do great harm to America's, is because they rely on direction for what to do, from the
McKinsey Consulting Group
and other consulting firms.
These consulting firms act in China's interests and damage America's interests, all while feigning that they are completely neutral actors, when their actions prove otherwise, time and again, since at least, the 1980s, and especially in recent years, focusing on the covid-19 response, for just one example.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.