Gregory is a canonised saint of both Eastern and Western churches. The brother of Basil the Great. He was the principal architect of Trinitarian orthodoxy at the council of Constantinople in 381. When the church could not decide on something Gregory and his writings were taken as fact. He is the authority. Not a kind suggestion. Well he wrote this:>He devised for His image the distinction of male and female, which has no reference to the Divine Archetype, but, as we have said, is an approximation to the less rational nature.” - Making of Man, XVI.14 Then he made it clear when he wrote this:>If there had not come upon us as the result of sin a change for the worse, and removal from equality with the angels, neither should we have needed marriage that we might multiply; but whatever the mode of increase in theangelic nature is (unspeakable and inconceivable by human conjectures, except that it assuredly exists), it would have operated also in the case of men, who were made a little lower than the angels, to increase mankind to the measure determined by its Maker.” - Making of Man, XVII.2What he is saying, bluntly, with no room for interpretation is that the angels did not have a male or a female sex, that such a thing is irrational, such a thing is not divine, and such a thing is for the worse, not for the better.Holy kek. How the fuck do modern day followers reconcile with this?
>>540284617Cunt, they look like this
>>540284702For the vast majority of church history you would be killed for challenging the word of Gregory.
Goyim are dumb animals
>>540284617he is in hell
>>540284617It means angels did not have genitals to reproduce as angels do not reproduce like humans.Also angels as being alien species to humans can have completely different sexual dymprphism like sea horses where male gets pregnant.And I write this hsit as an atheist who sees whole jewish nonsense you believe in as silly. But you just made this jewish nonsense look smart with how fucking retarded you are with your troony loony shit.
>>540284617>Angel's were TrannysGramer plz...So what if the angels are tranny? Are you a fucking angel? What's your point? What was the original sin? Man trying to become like THEM.
>>540285164Never does he mention sexual dimorphism. He says bluntly, that the male and female are not divine.
>>540285341I'm not a tranny but your canonised saint says that men and women are not in the image of god you moron.Shall I also quote Maximus the Confessor? Do you even read your religion?
>>540285443Trannies you dumbfuck need sexual dymoprhism though and this is what I was commenting on.Just KYS retard as you are too stupid to even comprehend what you yourself wrote in the OP.
>>540285481>I'm not a tranny but your canonised saint says that men and women are not in the image of god you moron.Exactly.Because A'dam was originally both sexes and in the image of THE GODS or godly creatures.But then the biological donation event happened and it went downhill.Adam was not even fully godly because he was half dirt.Are you not fucking reading the words in the book? It's pretty self-explanatory.
>>540284702>>540284862You're not even a real christcuck, LARPtranny.
Maximus the Confessor is also a canonised saint in both eastern and western churches.. what did he say about this issue?He said that christ does this:>"shaking out of nature the distinctive characteristics of male and female” - Maximus, Ambiguum 41 (Page 91)He then explains why division was necessary.>Thus God-made-man has done away with the difference and division of nature into male and female, which human nature in no way needed for generation, as some hold, and without which it would perhaps have been possible. There was no necessity for these things to have lasted forever.” - Maximus, Ambiguum 41 (Page 91)This is Gregory’s contingency-provision argument carried forward three centuries and stated, if anything, worse: the male-female division “human nature in no way needed for generation,” a thing with “no necessity” of lasting forever, driven out of nature by Christ starting with the division closest to the body.Go on. Do your mental gymnastics and explain that. You cant. You have absolutely no way to explain this. And even arguing against Gregory and Maximus is heresy.
The gospel of Phillip from the Nag discovery is even more explicit about this.>“When Eve was still with Adam, death did not exist. When she was separated from him, death came into being.” -Gospel of Philip, Nag Therefore we are being told that Eve was split out of Adam. They were one being without sex that got split to become two, non-divine beings.>“His separation became the beginning of death. Because of this, Christ came to repair the separation, which was from the beginning, and again unite the two, and to give life to those who died as a result of the separation, and unite them. But the woman is united to her husband in the bridal chamber. Indeed, those who have united in the bridal chamber will no longer be separated.” - Gospel of Philip, NagAnd there we have it. The entire point of getting married is to repair the damage that was done to both men and women in their fall from being in the image of god, to being what they are now.Original man had no sex. There is no other reading.
