What is going on in Texas>Muh polls are fakeIt's not 2016.
when the goy cattle start starving, they wont vote for the israeli party starving them
Texas is a brown state, thats whats going onsame thing that happened to California
>hispanics are natural conser-AACCCKKKKKK
>>540381436Turns out you cant run a program of deporting brown people
>>540380729
>>540380621People don't want to vote for the guy who helped a Jewish pedo.
>>540380621Yeah, the fakeness of polls have gotten way worse than 2016. Just look at 2024.
>Tallarico up by 4>8-10% undecidedLibtards fall for this every fucking time.
>>540380621I want Paxton to lose cuz he's a faggot. But I still don't believe in polls.
>>540383506If this were Cornyn vs Talarico or Crockett, Cornyn would be up ten points
almost happened before
>>540380729This is a good thing, whites are controlled by jews
>>540383766God, I forgot how close that race was.
>>540383766Beto was more handsome and didn't have the woke insanity of Tallarico. Libtards are so fucking delusional. The next poll can have Tallarico up by 10 and I would still put money on Paxton.
>>540384458>Beto was more handsome and didn't have the woke insanity of Tallarico.The fuck are you talking about, ladies think Talarico is a chad and Beto explicitly ran on grabbing guns.
>>540383766>>540384458Beto tried too hard, Talarico is dorky but authentic.
>>540384751>Beto explicitly ran on grabbing guns.Actually, he didn't do that until he ran for president during peak woke in 2020.
>>540384811>>540384751>>540384458>>540383906
>>540380621Voting is completely fake
>>540380621Trump 2.0 effect
>>540384751>Talarico is a chadHe's not. He looks like a white Urkel. Beto had that Bobby Kennedy look going for him.
>>540384830He was always anti-gun, he just made it an even bigger deal with the bigger platform of a presidential race. It's not like he shifted his position between 2018 and 2020.
>>540384889I didn’t even have to imagine the smell, this video attacked me through psychosomatics.
>>540384973Are you a woman? Because the women I've seen are swooning over him. Maybe we should put a picture of Talarico into a hot-or-not AI and find his true attractiveness rating to resolve this dispute.
>>540380621>82% of indians vote democrat making them one of the most liberal demographics in the USA>Jews vote majority democrat too>Hotwheels, in his infinite wisdom, dedicated his political career to fighting solely for them
>>540385129>Because the women I've seen are swooning over him.Sure thing retard. Stop confusing women with yourself.
>>540385129>>540385223He looks like bait for wine moms who see their son in him
>>540380621Paxton is a complete shitter whose only qualification is dutifully licking trump's asshole. His own party tried to impeach him for being a corrupt shitter.
>>540385223Also have you fucking seen the guy he's running against? He looks like a melting candle with a bad eye.
>>540385371>Also have you fucking seen the guy he's running against? He looks like a melting candle with a bad eye.Irrelevant. Other guy is a Republican in a red state. Beto had the handsome factor, which helped him. Talarico doesn't have it. He's not ugly, he's just not handsome.
>>540385223Swooning because he said he wants to abolish Texas prisons. 135k prisoners with raging boners released at once to ravage the femme. A Harlequin romance come to life.
>>540385317That's why he'll win.
>>540384751>>540384811Discord trannies got told to say Talarico was handsome. Fucking lmao. At least make it believable.
>>540385223Well, since you were kind enough to give us a picture of him I uploaded it to 2 different AI hot or not sites. The first rated him 5.9, the second rated him 85/100. So if we believe this, it might be that certain demographics of women find him more attractive than others. The question is if those demographics are the demographics he needs to win.
>>540385618I called him dorky Anon
>>540384458The Texas you grew up in no longer existsYou government sold its soul to become the #1 economic zone in the nation
>>540385643r/AI mod right here.
>>540385665brutaland true all over the west
>>540385643Demographics in question: retards and troons.
People don't appreciate that someone like Cruz kept on pulling the same shit as in California where the mayor and governor just so happen to not be around at all whenever some big disaster happens.
>>540385464>in a red stateAgain, it's all about demographics, and the demographics of current Texas indicate against this. Not to mention Trump pissed off most of his voters.>>540385816Retards are a very large demographic though, if Talarico can lock them down he can win easily.
Talarico is a gay pedophile
>>540383442This, independents will not vote for socialists.They are going to have a rough November.The mainline DNC dies with Kamala's campaign.The only reason the DSA looks strong is because they are taking over the remains of the party unopposed.We might be about to see a republican dynasty as the democrats collapse into a regional party unable to win federal elections.This happened to them during the progressive era after the Civil War too.
>>540385965The only gay pedophile involved in this race is the one Ken Paxton was friends with
>>540385891>Again, it's all about demographics,They been saying this for the last 20 years, retard. It hasn't worked out for libtards at all.
>>540383766Beto was a far stronger candidate than talafreako.
>>540385990>independents will not vote for socialistsThe fuck is this boomer shit, independents are far more likely to vote for socialists. Nobody under about 50 years old gives a fuck about muh soshulizm anymore.
>>540380621Polls are fake though only retards think voting matters
somehow, the dems are more appealing than the retarded kike worshiping niggerfaggots on the republican side
>>540386016Things are different now because Trump fucked up big time.>>540386018Beto was running in a political environment where most Republican-leaners were still loyal to the GOP. Even if we accept that Talarico is a weaker candidate, which is questionable at best, he can still win because Paxton has the Trunmp albatross hanging on his neck.
>>540380621Blue wave. Governor is retarded and a zionist golem. Democrats will replace him and with the influx of new yorkers, Californians, and Mexicans, it is going to be a blue hurricane
>>540386181Also in 2018 the economy was actually pretty good and it blunted a blue tsunami.
>>540386181>Things are different now because Trump fucked up big time.Same was said after 2020....and 2022.You are fucking delusional.
>>540385990Don't care, still voting Hong.
These are the same polls as 2018 too
>>540386324>2020You mean the year Trump lost?>2022You mean the worst midterm for the non-incumbent party in 20 years?
Texas is the death star of cuckservatism so fuck them>zionist psychos>as long as they come here legally>anime is illegal>ID verification>jeets jeets jeets>police state authoritarianism>muh jeebus>muh tranny bathrooms>the market is godNo thanks
>>540386405From what I have read Beto only led in two polls.
>>540385995>>540385341>>540385820retarded bot
>>540386433>You mean the year Trump lost?Yes, and Jan 6th. "IT'S OVER FOR DRUMPF NOW!">You mean the worst midterm for the non-incumbent party in 20 years?Yes and again "IT'S OVER FOR DRUMPF NOW!"But I'm sure 2026 will be the REAL end of Trump.
>>540386324>"The Texas Democratic governor candidate doesn't have the Trump albatross" was said in 2020 when Trump lost to Biden and there wasn't even a gubernatorial election in Texas that year>"The Texas Democratic governor candidate doesn't have the Trump albatross" was said in 2022 when Trump wasn't even the fucking presidentYou're fucking retarded and probably a GOP shill.
>>540386450>From what I have read Beto only led in two polls.>Trusting pollsThat Al Sayed in MI was supposed to win by 10, he won by 1.
>>540386529You are so delusional. Have fun with red texas for the next 20 years.
>>540386593The Republicans gerrymandered the shit out of Texas, so you could be right; a non-gerrymandered state would have flipped blue by 2010 with these demographics. But there's only so much gerrymandering can do when you not only alienate the opposing party, but also your own party. I'm not going to say Talarico's victory is a sure thing, because many Texas Dems have said that before and lost. But I will say it's possible.
>>540386728>The Republicans gerrymandered the shit out of Texas,Nothing to do with statewide elections you fucking retard.
>>540386752>gerrymandering has nothing to do with electionsLOL what the fuck am I even reading
>>540387049A statewide election isn't gerrymandered.
>>540386752>>540387049lmao
>>540387070>voting districts suddenly don't exist if it's a statewide electionYou're on mad crack lel
>>540387049Gerrymandering only affect House races. House seat = a certain district in a state. When gerrymandering occurs, a party attempts to reshape the geography of the districts to get more wins.In a statewide election (governor, senator, President) they just count all the state votes. Please explain how you think gerrymandering affects a senate election.
>>540387146Dude, go back to r/politics.
>>540387146They're irrelevant to a statewide election, Anon.
>>540387152>>540387198>>540387215Gerrymandering still affects state elections because districting determines where the polling places are and how many of them there are, which determines how many people get to vote. Just because there's no winner-take-all system that goes by district doesn't mean gerrymandering doesn't affect state elections.
>>540387240>Gerrymandering still affects state electionsIt doesn't.> districting determines where the polling places are and how many of them there are,STOP
>>540387240>>540387267Anon, there's no control over polling places based on congressional district, it is by county.
>>540380729People hate Trump and this presidency more than you could imagine
>>540387267>>540387314You yourselves admitted that elections for the state congress are done by district and not county, and there are elections for the state congress in Texas this year. Gerrymandering matters.
>>540387593>You yourselves admitted that elections for the state congress are done by district and not countyHoly fuck. Other anon said even though they are congressional districts, the individual counties in said districts is controlled by said individual counties.You are such a fucking embarrassment.
>>540387722>, the individual counties in said districts is controlled by said individual counties.the POLLIING PLACES in said districts is controlled by individual counties.
>>540387722>You are such a fucking embarrassment.I guess we'll see about that when the election happens.
>>540387895>I guess we'll see about that when the election happens.Irrelevant. You are here trying to tout that gerrymandering will affect the senate race. It won't.
>>540380621Paxton is going to lose and the rightoid chimpout here and on Xitter will be hilarious.
>>540380621I don't give a fuck about the USA. I make money and then I leave
>>540387937Whatever faggot. If gerrymandering worked the way you say it did it literally wouldn't exist in any election state or federal. Your faggot bitch boy republinigger is most likely going to get his ass handed to him because everyone is tired of your shit.
>>540388147>. If gerrymandering worked the way you say it did it literally wouldn't exist in any election state or federal.House is a federal election you fucking faggot. Please explain how gerrymandering affects Senate elections other than "uh, there's less poll places or something".
>>540388344I decided to ask AI about this too and here's what the AI gave:"Gerrymandering has a profound and measurable effect on state elections in the US, but its impact is not uniform—it is heavily dependent on the state, the political party in power, and the specific legislative chamber. Gerrymandering is the manipulation of electoral district boundaries to favor a particular party or candidate. Because state legislatures are responsible for drawing their own district lines (as well as congressional lines), the practice has a massive, direct impact on state-level politics.The most concrete way to measure gerrymandering's effect is through the efficiency gap, which measures how many votes are "wasted" for each party (votes for losing candidates plus surplus votes for winning candidates).The Data: In gerrymandered states, the map-drawing party can win a supermajority of seats with a narrow majority of votes. For example, in the 2018 Wisconsin state elections, Democrats won 54% of the statewide vote for the State Assembly, yet only won 36% of the seats. In Pennsylvania’s state House that same year, Democrats won 54% of the vote but only 43% of the seats.The Effect: In these states, gerrymandering effectively nullifies the statewide popular vote, meaning a party can lose the popular vote by a landslide and still control the legislature. This allows the majority party to pass legislation, override gubernatorial vetoes, and control the state budget without bipartisan support."
>>540388655All this an nothing about how it affects Senate elections>asked AISTOP
>>540388715>waaaah stop using AI to prove me wrongSeems to be a consistent theme with you.
>>540383442>libtards fall for this every fucking time.I mean they say it right there. If anyone is falling for something that is literally spelled out in front of them, that’s on them
>>540388793>>waaaah stop using AI to prove me wrongBut it didn't prove me wrong. Nothing in all that about Senate elections. You're not even reading the ai slop you are posting.
>>540388818Really? Well here's some more AI slop I didn't read:"The "Decisive" Races: In state elections, gerrymandering is usually decisive in 5 to 10 state legislative chambers nationwide (e.g., Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Texas, Ohio, and Florida). In these states, the maps are so skewed that the party in power would likely lose the majority if the map were fair, despite winning the plurality of the statewide vote."
>>540388931AGAIN nothing about SENATE elections. This is your last (you).
>>540383766And even more zio republican boomers have died in the past 8 years. Paxton is DOA.
>>540388986Funny, I thought we were originally talking about gubernatorial elections. And to be fair I probably should have specified when I said Texas would have gone blue without gerrymandering that I wasn't only referring to the governorship or which candidate Texas votes for in the presidential election, but the entirety of the state. But if you don't think gerrymandering has an impact on every aspect of every election I have an Indian restaurant to sell you.
>>540380621People need to just start voting out abhorrent people no matter who their party is. Paxton is one of them. Cruz is another. The turtle. Nancy. Schumer. The list goes on for both sides.
>>540389122>Funny, I thought we were originally talking about gubernatorial elections.I know I said last (you), but holy fuck>thread about SENATE race between Paxton/Talarico>your first post >>540384751 about Talarico>But if you don't think gerrymandering has an impact on every aspect of every electionIt doesn't and you still haven't proven otherwise.Last (you). I mean it this time, no matter how fucking stupid your next post is.
>>540389216Wait, this isn't an election for governor? Well, whatever. You're still gay and you suck cocks.
>>540380621What would be the difference in terms of american policy between the democratic party getting only the house and both chambers? What does Trump face in both situations?
I have to be honest with you all, I wandered into this thread without having done a single fucking second of research about what was going on and just started mouthing off. And why not? That's what everybody does nowadays. Nobody gives a fuck about facts or logic anymore. Never really did. They just kind of say shit and people go along with it. So I thought I'd try it. It was kind of liberating, to just not give a fuck and say whatever feels right. And I realized, that's how elections are decided.
>>540385341its absolutely grim that this is a US senate raceboth candidates seem unfit for the positiona senator should be a position that commands respect
>>540380621Republicans are fucked if Texas turns into a battleground state. Maybe they should have cared about demographics a bit more instead of playing their fucking jew games
>>540380621All Trump had to do was prosecute the Epstein pedos and not fight any Jewish wars....
>>540380621
>>540380729And a lot of California people have moved there in recent years
