What are the political implications of gods (plural) being real?
>>540394611It simply means the Bogdanoffs possess a somewhat capable slave class.
Here's the early Christian take, it's interesting. Justin Martyr claims that the various Pagan "gods" were actually demons, or people who had become demon possessed, by the Angels who participated in a rebellion against God. He directly references Enoch a few times too. Anyway, these demons, having knowledge of parts of God's will as they did his bidding, and knowing what the Biblical Prophets said, but not truly having the gift of understanding (being fallen and "soulless") attempted to install themselves as rulers of tribes, doing their best to conform to their flawed understanding of the Pentateuch, at first, then later as the Prophets gave their messages, the demons and demon-possessed heeded their words, but lacking understanding, again attempted to gain the power of God by larping out His plan, and failing in essential points.It's all covered by a number of ancient writers. These guys were around before Odinism was a thing, and countless other nu-Paganisms, but there was already such an explosion of such cults, driven by demons, that they had a huge catalog of examples to choose from.It's likely the biggest cultic explosion of all time happened as the Israelites were wandering, the whole story is them constantly creating cults and leaving behind settlers etc.Justin Martyr, 1900 years ago, wrote all this. He was a Greek Israelite and of high breeding and education and wrote two letters to the Roman Emperor which both survive. Very interesting reading. Kinda refutes Paganism itself.
Exodus confirms that other gods exist in the Abrahamic cosmology
>>540394611They rape me sometimes while I’m sleeping
>>540395154How does it feel?
>>540395117The condemnation of the old gods as demons is a pretty obvious rhetorical tactic for justifying the jump from them to Christianity. In the modern day Christians just say those gods aren't real and never were, since they aren't serious rivals anymore, but in the time of Justin people still believed in those gods being real (including many Christian converts in a fuzzy way). The utility of the "demon" approach is obvious;>Okay they're real but they're not gods, they're like evil sub-gods o algo, "demons" we'll sayIt also conveniently provided justification for early Christians to destroy their temples, murder their priests and burn their texts, which the early Christians did with feverish glee. Obviously it wouldn't be justified to attack rival gods, but "demons" who are "tempting" people? Well that's obviously good! And in practical reality such actions were very effective at increasing recruitment while making the enemy terrified to even appear in public, reducing their ability to keep followers.Early Christian accounts of demons are pretty revealing. I read one from an early saint who, after a year or two of hermitage in the desert, reported a "demon" appearing to him in the form of a sexy young boy (his words) begging to be molested. So either a metaphysical entity appeared to this guy or he was just feeling the effects of being in his 20s and not having jerked off in a few years.
>>540395464>The condemnation of the old gods as demons is a pretty obvious rhetorical tactic for justifying the jump from them to ChristianityBut he's citing a very ancient document which was somehow later suppressed in most of Christendom.He didn't just make it up, in his day Enoch was Scripture.>It also conveniently provided justification for early Christians to destroy their temples, murder their priests and burn their textsNone of that happened with early Christians, in fact they were sorely oppressed by the government and chased down and hunted and then set for sport in the arena against animals and criminals and gladiators.You're talking about later, after Rome asserted primacy and started hunting down non-Roman Christians as well as pagans. Hundreds of years later in fact.You're being dishonest and it's clear as crystal. Look up the martyrdom of Polycarp, for instance.
>>540394611None because they do jack shit
>>540394611Dead jews.
>>540395146Abrahamic religion is all kinds of confused on the subject, because 'god' is actually an amalgamation of three different Caanite deities who eventually got rolled together into one, so you go from "I'm the best god, worship me the most" to "I'm the best god, and you won't worship anyone but me" to "I'm the ONLY god, everyone else is a faker" and finally "I'm the only god, fullstop".But the bible, especially the old testament, is a bunch of stories written by different people across thousands of years in different contexts and times, so their perspective on the state of the universe and of god don't actually line up even in the heavily editted versions of the stories we have now, and even these modern versions would be basically unrecognizeable to anyone who lived 2000 years ago.
>>540394611it means politics is bullshit. it means the governments of the world were never for the good of the people and this is becoming more apparent as total surveillance and AI are available. in earlier times, bullshit events were needed like playing around with prohibition and more recently the trannies in women's sports or bathrooms. there is one God, these other 'gods' are the same ones since the beginning and they change their names. check out Reason in the french revolution or Columbia. if Satan truly despises God and everything to spite him, and God made Satan in male form yet Satan can change, why wouldn't Satan take the appearance of a woman?
>>540396865no, we have preserved copies of the received texts in the original language. we have faithful copies of the Bible. The language itself has been attacked and to read the Bible properly you need an older dictionary like a Webster's 1828 and a Strong's Concordance. The Bible is quite coherent and amazingly consistent but it's not picking up a F. Scott Fitzgerald book. It requires study and discipline. That is what it means to seek God. You work at it.