>>540398702Idgi
>>540398702The Beatles are overrated. The Kinks were a better "British Invasion" band and The Beach Boys completely blew them out of the water musically.
kpop did it, beat it, made it better by a billion times over
>>540398702>boomers were shidding themselves over these troons and their terrible musicunbelievable
>>540398702Let me know when a European does this
>>540398833>The Beatles are overrated.They are rated right where they should be. #1.>The Kinks were a better "British Invasion" bandThey were not.>and The Beach Boys completely blew them out of the water musically.For the early stuff, I suppose it is take your pick. Later on, only Pet Sounds stacks up. Brian Wilson doesn't deny it, not sure why you would.
>>540398702You just had to be there
>>540398702Kill yourself
>>540398933>. #1.>>540398939>You just had to be thereCounterpoint:
>>540398933The Beatles fucking suck ass
>>540398933Elvis said that that they sucked and who are you to doubt Elvis?
>>540398933Nah. Paul shit his pants when he heard Good Vibrations for the first time. He believed The Beatles would never be able to sniff that song, and they never did.
The Beatles were always on the cutting edge of originality and innovationTake the shitty recordings of their dead mate, clean them up, have a jolly good old singalong, and release three new tracks decades after their mate died.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Opxhh9Oh3rg&t
>>540398702Gay pop bands that market to 14 year old girls are for x-empires not emergent ones, stupid.
>>540399203>The Beatles were always on the cutting edge of originality and innovationBy playing Little Richard covers . . . going Mod after the Who and psychedelic after Pink Floyd . . .
>>540398702The Stones were so much better kill yourself please the Beatles suck so bad fuck you>>540398702
>>540399203>The Beatles were always on the cutting edge of originality and innovationThat wasn't hard to do back in the 60s. Jimi Hendrix is probably the most influential guitarist of all time, but virtually every cheesy hair band in the 80s had a guitarist who could play circles around Jimi.
>>540399373>play circles around Jimi.retarded since shredding does not equal skilland yes most of them were/are very skilled and technicalnow if you said srv....that would be a close match>>540398993he did? if true it adds even more to his king status then
>>540398833It's all boomer slop. Just white guys miming black rock and roll music on lsd. Simplistic music that boomers loved because their minds were fried on drugs.
>>540398933>not rating Surfs UpCome the fuck on manhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3FL9i2IiDQ
the zombies btfo both the shitty beatles and the kinks
>>540399203>The Beatles were always on the cutting edge of originality and innovationFucking lmao this opinion can only stem from people who have been taught by their boomer parents that The Beatles were the greatest band ever.Pleb by proxy.
They have like one good song. Otherwise their discography is trash like the Doors. Black Sabbath mogs them
https://youtu.be/JXnf4rcMsDwOthers even album mog
>>540398702plenty of faggots in Thailand too
Rock N Roll was a mistake. Hippies boomers permanently ruined the world.
>>540398702immediately forgettable acid music?not even close to the best music from that era btw
>>540398795>>540398833>>540398881>>540398900>>540398928the Beatles were british deep state plantsthey likely wrote none of the music themselves
God I hate niggers but they're right, most white music is fucking corny. But then again so is pretending to be a classy dope dealing cop killer. Musicians are so fucking gay.
>>540398702Grows a mustache?
>>540400598beatles were pop bong psyoplike taylor swift popsent to groom public into 60s hippie psyop and end rocksame pysop like grunge/alternative was to kill rockand they managed to do so that time during 90slikes of you are product of beatles and grunge>>>/wsg/6207803
