>He really does plan to form a third party.>Would you vote for him?His platform calls for:Equal application of the law, including to political elites.Greater U.S. sovereignty and reduced foreign influence.Reviving manufacturing, farming and craftsmanship.Restoring beauty and public order in cities.Health reforms, including support for RFK Jr.'s food agenda.Punishing government deception and declassifying more records.Promoting family formation and long-term thinking.Schools focused on practical knowledge and traditional views of human nature.Restrained foreign policy, including ending support for allies accused of harming civilians.Tighter immigration and English-only federal documents and ballots.
>>540411345America is a two platform country. Marxists finally understood this and are infiltrating the democratic party more openly. Tucker is going to learn, like the nevertrumpers before him, that his movement won't gain any ground until he tries to take the Republican party from MAGA, the way MAGA took it from the neocons before them.
>>540411345Realistically, if he followed through on establishing a third party he'd just guarantee Democrats have an easier time wiping the floor with Republicans going forward by splitting the Conservative vote.
>>540411345
>>540411345>buy an ad
>>540411345Russian funded Party?
Apparently Tucker became a conservative because The Eagles ran a train on his mother.Is getting back at the Eagles for spitroating your momma really a valid political philosophy?https://youtu.be/PhC7Gh84CdY
>>540411681Did they tell her she could check out any time she'd like, but she could never leave?
>>5404113451. Support Israel 2. Support Israel 3. Support Israel 4. Support Israel 5. Support Israel 6. Support Israel 7. Support Israel 8. Support Israel 9. Support Israel 10. Support Israel
>>540411345> the pope gave epstein a blessing> china didnt give epstein a business visa
>>540411345Sounds gay as fuck
>>540411517No one cares>>540411599
>>540411490There is no republican party anymore same as there isn't a democratic one.The lobbyists overdid it and both are completely and nakedly hollowed out.There isn't even enough meat to get rhetoric going for a campaign on either side.That's why you have Trump resorting to fucking communism scares and democrats scrambling to take control of the anti-zionist sentiment that's disrupting their core.This is going to be a very unstable period politically and the more they're threatened the more they'll destroy whatever is left of your structure as a constitutional country.
>>540411804This isn't new. In the 1960s the parties inverted, in the 19th century two new parties were created and hollowed out the previous parties.America since its inception voted blue or red. Occasionally a new party shows up to try to disrupt things, with varied successes, but they never last.
>>540411804whoops the plane for wtc 7 crashed in pennsylvania
>>540411948That's my point, can you say what either of the parties stand for today that would make them opposite?Even the masquerade of different social and economic issues is no longer a factor.Both are aligned and entirely focused on the whims of oligarchs and foreign wars. There isn't a real distinction to go off of. They even gave up on the different messaging they used to have. It's completely identical now.
>>540411345>Equal application of the law, including to political elites.>Greater U.S. sovereignty and reduced foreign influence.>Reviving manufacturing, farming and craftsmanship.>Restoring beauty and public order in cities.>Health reforms, including support for RFK Jr.'s food agenda.>Punishing government deception and declassifying more records.>Promoting family formation and long-term thinking.>Restrained foreign policy, including ending support for allies accused of harming civilians.>Tighter immigration and English-only federal documents and ballots.So the trump platform with some gay shit:>Schools focused on practical knowledge and traditional views of human nature.This would have been great 10 years ago. And it was, that's why we voted trump. >but trump got stopped on many issuescucker is not going to do any better than trump. In fact he'll do worse because he does not have the absolute force of personality that trump has. You need someone more radical than trump, more radical than tucker
>>540412249I don't think it's physically possible to be more compromised than Trump during his 2nd term.
>>540411345Sounds like a podcaster's platform, especially when it comes to use of the word "elites". It's vague enough to encompass anything and keeps being used by the right and center to describe everyone but billionaires and people who actually control the levers of power. They often mean cultural elites, liberal celebrities who support a system of qualified scientists, educators who teach things based off a standard that invalidates Tucker Carlson saying he was attacked by a demon (he sleeps with dogs in his bed) and JD Vance saying he believes UFOs are demons (he's the VP and has access to information that would help him understand they aren't demons). You could be poor as shit and hold the view that Tucker and Vance are retards if not just dishonest for broadcasting these beliefs and suddenly you're the elite. It provides cover to people making billions off controlling the masses and the military industrial complex.
>>540412091cunts will always vote for demonrats. republicans finally got the federal abortion law repealed
>>540411734No, but only because she is the woman in the song. Tiffany-twisted, pink champagne on ice, Mercedes Benz, pretty pretty boys she calls friends etc. Socialite heiress turned laurel canyon artist/hippy.I find it funny that the one thing Tucker can't do is actually name his pain because half his would-be supporters fucking love The Eagles when you come down to it. Its the nub of cowardice that is delicious.
>>540412322Trump is not compromised he's accomplishing many radical changes.
>>540411517You can't infiltrate either party. The radicals degrade into cuck centrists who worship the leadership. Just look at AOC.
>>540411345>and reduced foreign influence.Well that kinda rules him out, an unwitting tool is still a tool.
>>540412403What of the issues he ran on did he solve?
>>540412325>qualified scientists, educators who teach things based off a standarddeath to all university professors
>>540411345This guy is trying so hard to maintain this system. The system needs to die. We don't need equal application of the law, we need to use the law against our enemies. Also "tighter immigration" give me a break, millions must go -- not by choice, by bayonet. Also reviving manufacturing and promoting family formation are not simple policy items, they require massive restructuring of the economy and the federal reserve system.Tucker thinks he can patch up the system, like taping the leaky lifeboat. The system itself needs such a radical change, it's not conceivable unless we ditch the system entirely.
>>540412325>system of qualified scientists, educators who teach things based off a standardkill all professors
He's right you know.
HAHAHAHA OMG HOLY SHIT WOWTHIS THING FROM FOUR DAYS AGO THAT EVERYBODY AND THEIR BROTHER ALREADY RIPPED TO SHREDS SURE IS WORTH TALKING ABOUTGREAT POSTAND YOU REDDITSPACED IT FOR USTHANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE
>>540412325>system of qualified scientists, educators who teach things based off a standardthe question isnt why the theology and math faculty tolerate economics and sociology its why does the institution of friedman and foucault tolerate a few weirdos with their concepts of rigor and higher purpose
>>540411345America is not democratic. What the people want never has and does not matter. All they do is vote for a series of ballots that the corporations and rich want. That's it. It's not really democracy it's an opinion poll. All public policy is dictated by corporations and rich people. That's literally it. You can have a thousand people write a hundred letters each to their reps and it wouldn't matter, because they only listen to money, they only listen to lobbying. Now in my opinion that seems like not at all what your founding fathers wanted but what do I know............
>>540411345Only two of those points offer anything tangible. Might as well make your points>Make Americans wealthier>Arrest bad people>Defeat China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea
>>540411345I couldn't care less what some cia plant has to say. He used to hang around the same pedophiles he criticizes today.
>>540411345>Schools focused on practical knowledge and traditional views of human nature.funny
>>540412091There is a difference between what voters do, choosing between two choices that they may or may not feel are distinct, and what the members of those two choices do, which is fraternize, which they've always done, even back in the days of the founding.Look at what happened in the last 10 years. The veil of differentiation between the two parties waned, and all of a sudden new choices came about that promised something different to revitalize the two parties. It started with the right, voting a career democrat as the option for the republican party, using a nationalist messaging given to him by Bannon, while ripping off a Reagan tag line in Make America Great Again, Trump was able to reinvent the Republican party in the eyes of the people who lost trust in the party's more traditional members. Now more and more are catching wind that it's a lot of the same nonsense that it always was, just a new coat of paint on the same product. That's been done many times before.The democratic party lagged behind, now they're introducing these democratic socialists, but it'll be the same shit in the end as well, just another fresh coat of paint on the same bullshit. People will vote for the dems thinking the dems now are these socialist marxists because that's more exciting and dynamic, but they'll default to the same democrat nonsense once the machine chews them up.There's one of many photos of Clinton and Gingrich laughing it up in the 90s, this particular one I'm remembering of some function at the same time Gingrich was getting Clinton impeached for lying about getting a blow job. It mattered for the people on the low because it validated their feeling of antagonism with another, but for people at the top it was just one big country club, and it always has been. It doesn't change anything in the voting booth, and it never has.
>>540412522>reviving manufacturing and promoting family formation are not simple policy items, they require massive restructuring of the economy and the federal reserve systemtheres this one moral hazard that has to be removed>The system itself needs such a radical change, it's not conceivable unless we ditch the system entirelywhoever comes out from the elite and stops the system gets the eternal gratitude of the people
>>540412483You say 'solve' like you just put a pin in it and end it... like that is even a possibility when you have an opposition party that controls the media and works against you. Trump actually is pushing radical changes on immigration , economics, geopolitical posture, refugee policy (we are only taking in white south african refugees). It is not a matter of 'solve' it is a matter of pushing in the direction he promised. Trump is doing much better than tucker would do, or than any other person would do because he has many assets that none of them do, so he can resist the mediatic tides
>>540412722>for people at the top it was just one big country club
Things that must be radically fixed-- The two party system-- Immigration must be fixed in a "permanent" sort of way, so it doesn't flick on and off between elections.-- Political lobbying itself.-- Major economic loopholes that create billionaires and trillionaires. -- The birthrate. -- Debt and the consumer economy itself, which means the federal reserve system. -- Urban birthrates.-- Vast political corruption-- Libertine pornography and violence destroying souls. -- We now have violent communist radicals multiplying in the country. Historically this sort of infestation has required extreme measures.I'm just saying, every single one of these items is a signpost telling you the system is beyond redemption. It needs to collapse. We probably have to go through like 50 years of pure dictatorship, before we can finally right all the wrongs and deploy a system that works. Just saying it like it is. I know that's not a convenient answer, but it's just the reality of things.
>>540412401I never knew that Tucker's mom was a bohemian whore during the hippie era, and that she hated her kids so much that she tried to leave them both 1 dollar in her will.
>>540411490We have a two party system because we have single winner elections. All systems with single winner elections will eventually devolve into a two party system. This is called Duverger’s Law./pol/ is generally too lazy to read about it or too stupid to understand this basic political concept:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duverger's_lawThe top priority of any third party should be to end first past the post, single winner elections. If it’s not, then the people running that platform are either stupid, grifters, or plan on eventually joining the Republican or Democratic Party and are just making a name for themselves.
>>540411345The real 10 points:1. Greatness2. Advancement3. Security4. Treatment5. Homeland6. Equality7. Justice8. Economics9. Work10. Strength
The conflict isn't between parties, it's now between the old WASP elite and the new "meritocratic" elite (Jewish neo + shabbos hangers on).For the past 30 years, they may have made a truce, and the WASPs surrendered much of their power to the (((meritocratics))), but it appears that the WASPs have now broken ranks and are staging a coup to take back their old power.Tucker is their mouthpiece; he is an East Coast alumni from Connecticut, the WASP power base.Like any out of favor elite looking to unseat the incumbent elite, they must recruit the peasants trailer park masses to their side, hence the podcastery appeals to the dumb masses with stuff about guardian angels and whatnot. (He probably washes his mouth out when he turns the mic off).
>>540412982You're essentially advocating for a fascistic style of government. I don't necessarily disagree with it but there's no inkling that a government like that can or will ever take place in the US. Stranger things have occurred in history I know, but I just don't see it happening.
>>540413322>All systems with single winner elections will eventually devolve into a two party system. This is called Duverger’s Law.Of course. But the correction to that is a parliament, which introduces another problem. The fact that the leader is now 2 steps away from the election. The American system is designed so that you can immediately remove a poorly performing executive by popular vote. Notice in Europe you have unpopular prime ministers lurking around for years or decades after they're unwanted, and the people can't do shit about it. I think the concept of democracy itself is kind of a failure. I think the system we go with needs to have democratic elements, but we need some sort of aristocratic element taking a greater role in things.
IF ELECTED TUCKER WILL BECOME A LIZARD KING https://youtu.be/UDZ_ldUNRcY
>>540413370Fascism is not a long-term government. It's not going to last 50 years, hell it might not even last 20 years. Fascism is described as the white blood cells rushing to fight an infection in the body. In times of extraordinary crisis, the Romans would appoint a temporary dictator to raise an army and deal with the emergency. This was considered an honorable and noble duty. That's the essence of fascism. I think things are at such a degree, we need to go through a period of time where we can make a radical course correction, and that will require a fascistic period. I don't think that's an admirable system, or one that should be in place long term.
>>540413331Even dumber.A platform should include a 5,000 word treatise on each bullet point, not just a basic list of stuff you like. Live political debates should be done away with as well. They exist to manipulate the low IQ, emotional masses. “I have a good feeling about this candidate.” That’s not how political leadership should be chosen. Candidates should publish written works that can be discerned and discussed, not 30 clips that make nice sound bites for Facebook. >im gunna bring back manufacturing Ok, nigger. How? There are so many god damn details that have to be discussed on a singular, popular topic like this that a televised debate is just a straight up retarded platform for it. Of course they can’t do this because we all know most people wouldn’t be able to understand it, so the concept of universal suffrage falls apart without emotional manipulation being the lynchpin of democratic elections.
>>540413428A ranked choice vote would solve most of the problems we currently have with FPP. Sure, two main parties would still win most of the time, but people could vote freely for their preferred candidate which would allow smaller parties the ability to get federal funding and even a place during the debate on national news.
>>540413664>Live political debates should be done away with as well.I believe the opposite. But I think in general democracy is kind of a problem. There are a lot of out-of-the-box solutions to democracy's foibles. One such answer is to simply raise the hurdle of voting. Like, only those who've served in the military can vote. In general you should have to *earn* your vote, to filter out the dumbasses who base their decision on the TV. You could try what Britain did and go with a "house of lords" and "house of commons", our House and Senate chambers were modeled directly after that. My favorite idea is to make political candidates battle it out, literally. Anyway once we're talking about fixing the system, pandora's box opens, there's so many solutions.
>>540413882it's no good because there are already too many political options for most people to keep up with. This is just going to empower medias to generate surgically targetted political groups to take representation away. Think about third party spoiler but for every race you might win
>>540413882But having smaller parties clogging up everything would make it way harder to pass stuff right? I dunno man. At the end of the day, do these representative bodies even work? Because let's assume each representative has their own opinions. Once you add them all together, all their opinions cancel out to a population average. The only thing they end up agreeing upon is whatever makes them more money, and wins them elections. That's like that sum-vector result of their minds. Guys like Hitler, Napolean, Caesar, all remarked that these congressional bodies are totally useless, highly corrupt. Hitler called it "a sack of rotten apples". Well anyway, such bodies are very unsuited to handling crisis situations, where the nation is coming apart, or going through radical changes.
>>540414233Ranked choice removes the spoiler effect by simulating an instant run-off election tho.
>>540411345i've said for years i'd vote for a tucker presidential campaign. he has the most coherent idea of what we need - some sort of nationalist populist program, third way between nationalism and socialism
>>540414325Oh no I agree that an unelected technocratic government would be superior, but the chances of that happening are slim-to-none here.
>>540414343no it compounds it because normie normieston cannot evaluate 100 candidates. By chopping everyone into little isolated territories you give the power to the media to determine who the winner is via narrative because the normie cannot parse that much information himself
>>540412811Ah, so he hasn’t solved shit and you are a lying troon
>>540415536That is your cope and i detect also some seethe
Implement a nationwide free voter ID program and make them mandatory, just like in Mexico. Otherwise, you'll always have problems between the two sides over whether homeless Americans will get lumped together with illegal immigrants.
It doesn't matter, the country is broken and won't be fixed.
>>540411490>Republican party from MAGA, the way MAGA took it from the neocons before them.fraid to tell ya, anon, but the neocons are back in charge anon
>>540412322Cucker went from being Staunchly anti-immigration and borderline Anti-Semitic to glazing third-world shitholes like Iran and fucking Venezuela and becoming reddit-friendly "anti-Zionist" in a matter of a Year, I've seen junkies with more of a back-bone than Cucker has. The "Principled Conservative" Schtick is such a dead giveaway. It's obvious he's banking getting as much support from from the Chinks, Muslims, and Ruskies for a presidential bid than any Idea of him being actually "America First" is just as laughable as Bernie Sanders or Vivek being America First
>>540411345does he still support vance? if the answer is yes, then to hell with him
>>540411948There's actually 4 parties in America yes. Some kind of black hat DNC and white hat DNC - local government coalition and federal body and the locals are the real thing. The federal body of the two parties are just for dealing with foreign diplomacyhttps://cloakbin.com/3xhRNVLL#Ei9MGdD0aX4CUtO3bq9IqXeEoju599KSLyDcvZw9Qh0.>>540413322Read above post >>540413332Hillary was closer to Bob Dole than Obama yes>>540412982People like you need to shut the fuck up first to actually achieve anything. Stop making up random do to list. Tucker made 10 of them. Just follow it you fucking faggot who are you?
just make an vocal, visible "anti-israel/anti-aipac" party and it would be a wildfire meme with global support in 24hrs
>>540411345MY PRESIDENT
>>540413332>the new "meritocratic" elitehuh? are you fucking retarded? you mean the new epstein class right?
>>540411345He can form a third party without being its presidential candidate you know
>>540411345We need more specifics. Anything with AI is automatically discarded.
>>540419702He means Jews fucking retard, Jews ousted the Old Masonic (WASP-y) society and replaced with the fake and gay ZOG we know today
>>540411744how is it all connected ?
