[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: DO NOT MENTION FLOCK.jpg (446 KB, 1586x1084)
446 KB JPG
>A Wapello County Sheriff’s Office policy obtained by 404 Media states: “DO NOT MENTION ALPR USAGE TO THE OCCUPANTS OF THE VEHICLE” and “DO NOT MENTION ALPR USAGE IN YOUR REPORT OR COMPLAINT UNLESS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY.”

https://archive.ph/AVBlb
https://archive.ph/VVaXH
>>
>>540417274
So the correct response to a traffic stop is
>do you have a warrent?
>i'm gonna call a lawyer brb.

Lamo
>>
File: 1758761709345516.png (311 KB, 1085x684)
311 KB PNG
>CTRL-C
>CTRL-V
>POST POST POST
>ahhhh there it is
>those sweet sweet (You)s
>>
>>540417594
>NOOO STOP EXPOSING THE COPS!!!
glownigger has entered the thread
>>
File: fbi-glow.gif (965 KB, 640x640)
965 KB GIF
>>540417594
i bet you can see this reply from space
>>
>>540417274
"I do not give my consent to a warrantless search"
>>
>>540417388
Thanks

It’s obvious traffic stops have been escalated to a new level. So much for the USA
>>
>>540417274
You can act as your own attorney and are before any representation. This just means in every stop you ask if an automatic license plate reader was used prior to them physically observing you.
>county resources
I thought these were only on private property and that's how they get around the clear constitutional violations? A private piece of information, even obtained willingly, is not 'county resources'.
>>
>>540418058
CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT
L
A
S
S

A
C
T
I
O
N
L
A
W
S
U
I
T

This will lead to Billions being paid out.
>>
>>540418058
Worked in road design and construction for years. There are hyper specific rules for anything in the right of way. Right of way can be private, city, county or state. Rules are all the same basically. Any “pole” in the right of way needs to be approved and installed in a very specific way so it doesn’t kill or skewer a driver. Flock camera installation does not meet any of those safety standards. Honestly some drivers need to be killed by an improperly installed flock camer to sue the ever living hell up and down the camera access chain. All the current strick object in the right of way codes are all based on tons of lawsuits. Flock came in like a baggy underwear nigger and is invading a restricted area.

My guess is they can put them on existing poles because they would have to admit they belong to someone in the chain of government ownership.
>>
Honestly someone should pay a black lady on welfare to hit one with her car full of kids and a grandma. Immediately have an ambulance chasing lawyer sue everyone. It’s a goldmine
>>
>>540417274
Death to all boots. It is moral and just to show the nice officer their god of choice
>>
>>540417388
You don't need a lawyer for a traffic stop just refuse all searches and seizures and do whatever the cop says. If they violate your rights, let them and sue them and then take their house if they lose qualified immunity. Most cops aren't THAT retarded and most will puss out when pushed especially now in the age of auditors and lawsuits.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.