You say, "I was born against my own will!" But let me ask you this: how can someone not be born against their own will? It is metaphysically impossible to not be born against your own will.God did not choose to be, He Is."But why eternal punishment?" Because you refuse to give up. You were born against your own will, yet now that you are alive, you are imposing your own will unto that which gave you birth. Why is this?In the beginning, you recognized yourself as not the source of judgement, yet now you sit on the judges seat and say, "My will be done," and indeed your will be done, for this is judgement: that whoever refuses to give up their own will in the face of the will of the one who brought them to life, will have plenty of what they desired.For this reason he said, "Your will be done" for those who give up their own will in the face of the will of the one who brought them to life, they will indeed share in his will and in his eternal life.What then is the will of God? "This is the work of God, that you believe in him whom he has sent."To believe is to be, and act. If you believe that the stove is hot, will you put your hand into it? How then, if you believe in him, can you not thrive to become like him?As it is said, "I have set you an example that you should do as I have done for you."Judgement is like a sieve. Why then are you trying to fit the square block inside the circural hole?To remain in him, you must share in his nature, the very nature revealed through his one and only son: love, compassion, justice, mercy and faithfulness. These are his true nature.The one who loves and knows the truth can confirm that my words are true, and he will do the will of the one who brought him to life.I am here doing his will.Now go and remain in him, and in that day, you will share in his eternal life.
>>540426275i believe in god. i just don't believe in your god.
>>540426497If you think there's such a thing as personalized gods then you don't believe in God. There's only one Principal Cause, so it stands to reason that every culture and every religion has always been paying homage to the same eternal Being with their worship. The acts of worship themselves are the only thing that change, not the Divine Source being worshipped.
>>540426627>the same eternal Beingdoesnt actually exist, "God" is just a placeholder that (mostly brown) morons use as convenient explanation for things they are too low IQ or too ignorant to grasp.
>>540426497There is only one true God, He sent His Son into the World to reveal Him. And anyone who rejects the Son rejects the One who sent Him because they are one.
>>540426720No, it's actually the other way around. Rationality dictates that there absolutely must be a first cause. Atheism is a superstition invented by the unintelligent, because they lacked the education necessary to understand logical precepts.
>>540426627>>540426779i worship the sun, and i can prove my god exists
>>540426841>there absolutely must be a first causethats just an assumption. then you take this wrong assumption and build a hypothesis on it and trying to pass it off as a fact. of course this will be wrong since your initial assumption was wrong.what we actually observe is that the universe is infinite and doesnt need a first cause or a foreskin eating jew god creator at any step of the process.
>>540426876What you said is funnier than you think. The sun and the moon are not random objects in the sky; they testify to the truth about the Father and the Son: if you look at the sun, you will become blind, but by looking at the moon, you are seeing the sun's light. The moon's light is not its own; the light belongs to the sun, and by looking at the moon, you are able to receive it. So does the Son make the invisible Father known to you. This is why "I and the Father are one" and "The Father is greater than I" are both true.
>>540426998It's not an assumption because it's not a premise, it's the end conclusion of a logical argument. The premises for that argument are all logical axioms, such as "no true statement can disagree with itself" and "it is not possible for nothing to give birth to something". Those irrefutable axioms are what lead to the conclusion that there must be a primary cause.
>>540427195>for nothingyou make the assumption that "nothing" exist as a state when it clearly does not.the universe always existed and thus never needed a foreskin obsessed jew god to create it. perfectly logical.
>>540426497Your entire belief system revolves around a book that was written by a bunch of hallucinating kikes. Kill yourself nigger faggot.
Truth is not something that exists independently of a grounding. Instead, truth is that which stands on its own. Truth does not require a grounding because truth and what grounds it are one and the same: whatever the ground is, truth also is.If I say, "You ought not to do this!", I am already assuming that there is something that grounds the claim I am making. But I am here to tell you that the truth of the world is binary, and the answer to a binary is either "one" or "zero". This is the binary: that the foundation of the world is either blind, or it is mind-like.If you are willing to see the truth and listen to my words, you will indeed listen and see it. The reason it is a binary is this: evaluation itself requires a mind. We have NEVER observed evaluation of value, nor meaning, nor purpose, nor right nor wrong outside of a mind.A stone doesn't say to the tree, "Get out of my way!" Neither does water say to the fish, "What are you doing?" Evaluation requires a mind, and the foundation is either mind-like or it is not. The answer is either "yes" or "no".Why do I say, "It is either mind-like or it is not"? Do you still not understand? Since evaluation requires a mind, the foundation would need to be mind-like for there to be something objective which grounds your claims about value or meaning or purpose or any kind of moral claim.There either is a God, or there isn't, and I am here to tell you: there is a God, and He Himself is that grounding. He is the truth, and everything flows from Him. He is the foundation of the world, the eternal life that gives life to everyone.And this is sin: to not live in accordance with the foundation. How can someone who lies remain in truth? How can one who is filled with hatred remain in love? On the last day, He will separate the chaff from the wheat, the sheep from the goats, truth from falsehood, and hate from love.And thus His judgment is just, because you refuse to align yourselves with the truth.
>>540427278No, I don't make that assumption at all. Just because I used the word "nothing" does not mean I'm asserting that nothing can exist. My statement clearly said that it is not possible for something to emerge from nothing, meaning nothing does not exist as per my original statement. The fact that nothing does not exist is undeniable proof of a first cause, since if there is no nothing then reality must be founded upon a something. Do you have trouble understanding English?
>>540427419>My statement clearly said that it is not possible for something to emerge from nothing"nothing" was never a state the universe was in to begin with.>is undeniable proof of a first causeno its proof that a first cause is not needed in a infinite universe.>Do you have trouble understanding English?no but you do, probably from the circumcision you had to endure.
>>540426275>"Look, Lord! I posted it again!"How many times a day are you going to spam this, you loser?
