if you are ok with the war of all against all as in nature yeah
that includes temporary allegiances sure, but still

It does work but not for humans. It requires a significant elevation in consciousness that humanity is currently very far from. The reason the government keeps the ayys secret is because the ayys don't respect the government or human power structures; they don't land on the White House lawn and say "take me to your leader". They don't care about the leader and see such things as primitive.

>>540440462
>What does he mean by this?
he means it will never work

>>540440462
>there are animals all around us that live in complete anarchy
wrong
animals have clear hierarchies, territories etc.
>Some work against nature collectively, and some work against nature individually.
just like humans

Anarchy works, its simply known as crime.
You are falling for a sterotype, that was created to act as a fly trap, similar to other sterotypes.
Have a nice day.

>>540440462
No system of government works. Democracy doesn't work because the leaders keep getting corrupted by jews and do their bidding instead of their constituents. You need to remove the jew first.

>>540440995
>Anarchy works, its simply known as crime.
So then are the only two choices between government sponsored anarchy for the rich and plain old vanilla anarchy?

>>540440462
anarchy is the default state of humans

only since fuckin Cain went and build the first city and civilization ensured, we had shitfuckery like kings, ranks, and the rest of the evil sorts

>>540441397
tell me you dont know what anarchism means without telling me you are fucking clueless

>>540441932
Clearly I was responding to anon’s definition of anarchy. I never said I agree with his definition.

>For dose ov you dat don't know
>proceeds to complain and give the mildest take ever for 20 minutes

>>540442067
Bjorn must comply with youtube’s tos. He’s far from being the most soulless personality on the platform, so I watch his content from time to time.

>>540441397
not sure if you mean by vanilla anarchy what i mean by that and if you include the rat race into your state sponsored anarchy for the rich, but generall, well no, of course there is always the option of total subservience which means no anarchy for you, only rules and boots, its all on a spectrum

>>540440462
it requires certain conditions to work. and even if it works out for one nation, they would just be conquerd by a state with a strong army.

I researched this and looked at different groups in history that had anarchy, where there was no "state government" and people just lived and cooperated. and there are certain similarities. the places where it worked was with a homogeneous groups where the people look out for their own or have to because the land is harsh and you need everyone to survive and work to contribute. and it works in an out of the way place that's not important/hard to get to.

in order to have it work in modern times you'd need a land with a homogenous group so everyone cares about their neighbors and their land. and somehow have enough power to defend your country and have people agree to defend it from foreign invasion and other governments.

in places that had no government, but have multi ethnic societies, it just becomes really bad, like what normies imagine when they har the word anarchy