>>540469508
you've got it all wrong. You are the meat for the meat grinder, they are here to act as the peak human capital

>>540469508
no Hans, immigrants is for breeding yt women. Fighting in wars is for locals

>>540469508
Yeah this is the biggest hole in lefties logic, "Nooo you can't just turn our cherished muslims into minced meat against Russia!".

And no, they don't need to be supplied with weapons, they can bring their own.

>>540469508
guess what happens when you arm them

>>540470538
I see the potential risk, but is it any different from arming nazis in Ukraine?

File: 17861321898730.png (1.53 MB, 2166x1218)

1.53 MB PNG

>>540469508
>>Europe suffers severe manpower shortages in war against Russia
what?

>>540469508
>illegal immigration
that's a thing? I thought we don't do that in Germany

>>540470790
Russia Ukraine war
We are on Ukraines side

File: 1775679150291355.jpg (80 KB, 718x1024)

80 KB JPG

>>540469508
This thought crossed my mind years ago. It would be the ultimate irony of history if the supposed anti-racist import were actually cannon fodder.

File: Carlos.jpg (35 KB, 600x600)

35 KB JPG

>>540469687
Please leaf the thread.

>>540471235
>We are on Ukraines side
Skill issue

>>540470671
it's the difference between a civil war and a proxy war

>>540472181
As long as it is contained to Ukraine, i do not really see how it would affect us.

>>540470790
Anti-russia faction features these people:

women - not fighters
boomers - minimum 55 years old, no fighters
investor class - imagine thinking these guys will go fighting
investor class pampered sons - idem above
globohomo propaganda guzzlers - never raised anything in their life heavier than a pencil, still possible fighters
bluepilled retards - only group of acceptable fighters

Pro-russia faction features these people:
30% of warrior-age males at minimum - will reach 60% minimum if asked to fight in war
50% of males doing work necessary for civilization to exist

If you send to war the pro-russia people as soldiers, they will desert to russia at key moments during the war; as officers, they will leak intelligence to russia where to bomb your hidden depots and your colonel meetings.

If you don't send the pro-russia people to war, you risk them staging a coup as soon as things get too dire.

SO if you send too much of the anti-russia faction to war and the pro-russia faction stages the coup, they will be successful, so a number of anti-russia faction has to remain in the country to match the pro-russia faction that could rebel.
This lowers your drafting numbers considerably.

To send the pro-russia to war unwillingly, you need to have a great number of anti-russia faction stay at home for impressment (busification), This lowers your drafting numbers considerably too.

If you pivot to use immigrants on the frontlines, your enemy will use browns from other nations on the frontlines too.

Result: if europe goes to war with russia, they risk getting couped as soon as shit hits the fan by the pro-russia faction; if that does not happen, the hundreds of thousands of anti-russia faction deaths will still gift the election majority to the pro-russia faction next election.
Are anti-russia faction people even willing to go to war once they have been told that this will cause the faction of people they are against to become stronger?

WW3 is not easy game