>Bottom 50% of Chinese have double the net worth of bottom 50% of muttmericans
>>540469613China has a lower gdp/capita than Romania. Whilst working 50% more time. China aint shit.
>>540469613They have the strictest immigration policy
China has a lower gdp/capita than Singapore. Whilst working 50% more time.China aint shit.
>>540469613Bottom 50% of Chinese is literally 4x the population of the bottom 50% of the US, you dumb nigger. So if they don't have 4x the net worth, they aren't even breaking even with us.
>>540469613How many people make up the bottom 50% of china?
Source: your ass
>>540469613selection biasonly the wealthy or talented chinks can emigrate to usathat's still smarter than what france is doing - i.e. importing the dumbest muslims on the planet and thinking they're fixing their economy
>>540469613US is like $200k median networth and China is like $27k
>>540469613Per capita strikes again!
>>540469613Doubt
>>540470731>US is like $200k median networthThat's not really that good when boomers own multiple multimillion dollar homes.
>>540469613I would bottom her if you catch my drift
>>540469686>>540469733bot relies, pathetic. GDP per capita is always subject to exchange rates. The RMB is artificially devalued compared to the USD, which makes Chinese look poor while in reality, the purchasing power of their monthly income is about the same or even higher than that of the average US citizen.Since China makes everything on their own, a devalued currency doesnt matter since they wont have to use their lower currency to buy goods sold in higher USD as Japan needs to do.Romania might have higher GDP per capita in USD than China, but your prices are also valued in USD and not yuan/RMB, which means that the romanian village rapist can infact afford less than the average Chinese peasant with his wage, since Romania doesnt make anything and he is forced to pay premium for imported cars, while the Chinese peasant can buy a cheap Chinese made EV that is priced in accordance to China's own wage level.
