The main current problem of international politics is the difference in country sizes. Previously, during colonialism and before education and industrialisation arrived to the third world, a small European country could outproduce the whole India or Indonesia by using a huge machine and shitton of cheap energy. Nowadays such an advantage is gone. But such micro countries have the weight in international politics which severe disproportionate to the economic output, perspective and most importantly their real capability to solve the world’s problems. Their approach to that reminds more a religious sermon than actual business with a clear plan. Shouldn’t UN and other international organisation be reorganised and divided into kind of clubs, where administrative entities of similar size share and solve their actual problems?
>>540472300like for example the relate, some Indian or Chinese village agglomeration would greatly benefit from the experience of Croation administration. But why the fuck they think they could be of any use advising for example, Iran? This clearly useless, but the problem is that their involvement simply slows down any progress and brings a mess from useless ideas.
This is an interesting thread. Unfortunately I haven't thought enough about this to give a meaningful answerAll I can say is that UN is not at all ideal in its current format. It is an exclusive club for the five permanent membersThe crazy thing is that India was once offered China's place in that club of five and we said no
