What's wrong with taking care of another man's offspring?
>>540580794Literally nothing. Only men who will never reproduce anyway seem to have a problem with it. Projection me thinks.
There's literally nothing wrong about it if you have full info and decide on your own
>>540580794It is cucked and annoying. If that guy wanted to not be with them it was for a reason. No interest in spending my hard earned $$$ on broken projects. I have had it a bunch of times that single moms try to poach me. I am an electrician with a few employees and when fixing stuff in older buildings I regularly meet these single mom types. No thanks. If that guy thought he was better off without them he must have had a reason.
>>540580794if you let the mother know she's getting the boot if they don't respect you, it might be ok. Otherwise you're setting yourself up to be pushed around in your own home.Most married men are pussy whipped anyway, so it's probably not a big deal either way
>>540580794If you can't or won't have your own white kids, helping raise someone else's white kids in Positive White Identity is a blessing to the White People.T H E U SH E U S TE U S T HU S T H ES T H E U
According to islamic jurispudence, there isnt anything wrong with it.You just dont get to represent them in marriage for a wali. And they are not legally obligated to child support payments, nor to inheritance.The father's line continues via living relative, so their paternal relatives or mother would be responsible to taking care of the child, if the stepdad dont want to
>>540581038I dont really care about any people, no matter their race
>>540580794I just don't like it, it is not natural, rather repugnant.What is wrong for lion killing all other lion's cubs after taking over tribe and start inseminating with own? https://youtu.be/Nq7_gDdjBgUhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJRPT18DR9s
>>540580794This again? Nothing in itself.But it's often associated with adultery.Besides you are becoming a wedge between two people that have a natural connection (the child). That is bad for you and for them.Finally, you are often enabling whoredom.
>>540580794Nothing. It depend of the circumstances, it's bad if it's a single mother roastie who divorced. It's good if it's a widow or a abandoned white child. Some people are infertile, they are glad to ressort to adoption.
>>540581108You were brainwashed, like all of us were (presuming you're white).
>>540581218I dont want to take care of anyones children, if you would be working hard for your money you wouldnt either.
>>540580794It's only wrong to do if it's your first choice before you've exhausted all other options. If you find out you're sterile, then at least if you have good morals or ideals, you can still memetically pass those on to other people's offspring.
>>540580794you do it when you pay taxes
>>540581240I'm commenting on your deracination, not your desire to be free of responsibility.
>>540580794Jew or JeetCalled it!
>>540580794You are wasting time, energy, and resources propagating someone else's genes instead of your own.
>>540580794I'm just not going to, okay?I will go to Taiwan or the Philippines and get a teen or something.
>>540583007> deracination,Being White has never done anything for me> Just pick up some hag woman because it is the right thing to do NO
>>540583261>Being White has never done anything for meof course not, your people are living under repression in their own country
>>540580794It's for cucks who like to live their lives on other people's terms so if you are okay with that.
There is not a single molecule in my body that would let me take care of a roasties groids be them black or WhiteShould’ve picked me when you where 16 girl, but you didn’t and now you’re shit out of luck.Good luck tho, or whatever
>>540580855Same men have indian/islamic values. Izzat every interaction is a 0 sum game.
>>540580794What's good about it...?All you're doing is enabling child-abandoners.
>>540580794I don't think it's wrong to adopt children as your own. I think even taking in a widow with children can be justified. I'm just against marrying a woman whose child(ren)'s father(s) is(are) alive. It just makes no sense.I just don't think it's right to force full paternal responsibility onto a man who graciously adopted a child out of the kindness of his heart: specifically in cases where the biological mother and/or father of the child is/are alive and well. He doesn't owe the child a thing.If, however, the kid is an adopted orphan,that kid must be taken care of and is your full responsibility. Things of course get complicated if you married a woman with kids but then she dies and leaves you with the kids. You know what? Just don't marry or even cohabit with a woman who has children. Not worth the hassle. Adopting is fine though.
>>540580794>What's wrong with taking care of another man's offspring?the father likely has a legal right to see and interact with his children so you will be a party to cuckoldry, directly or indirectly. the mother will expect financial and emotional support from you, even as she double dips and collects child support from the real father. any discordance between the mother and the father will involve you -- women are biologically incapable of compartmentalization or solving their own problems. it goes without saying that the children will have behavioral problems. again, this will make your life a living hell.raising another man's children is only acceptable in the case of the father being dead. in all other cases, it is the most excruciating and extensive humiliation imaginable.
>>540581184Id raise a White orphanI wouldnt begyve myself to a single mothers and her kids.
