America and the rest of the world can't beat chinese production. The 6th Gen fighter race shows this.
>>540608659jet fighters are relics of the past, similar to battleships during ww2
>>540608803Go god thing china has more drones too.
I warned American close to two decades a go, in detail. In fine detail of every single thing that is now happing as a consecunceAnd how it would happen and why. From North routes, to middle East, to war traps and civil warz to production, economy, shifts to save it that would be traps like india and mexico... the deadly shortcuts made in a frenzy.I posted this and much more, and K mean fine fucking detail, on glp and elsewhere... and what I got in return was extreme hell.And I do mean Extreme Hell.
Skico life. lol
>>540608659How many drone bombs could you have for the cost of one of these?
>>540609187probably hundreds or thousands
That's a cool 3 render that will never actually exist like all that chinkshit those insects gloat about.
Yes, China can build those fancy airplanes and yada yadaBut can they build a Country in which people WANT to live? I dont think so. Most of the chinks are trying to run away from China and enter into USA.streets dont lie. Just go look outside and count how many chinks you see.
>>540609187used ai for this: The combined average unit price between the F-22 and the J-20 (6th gen fighters) is $131.25 million USD.With a $131.25 million USD budget, you could produce approximately 3,750 baseline Shahed-136 drones based on their average manufacturing cost.Production Estimates by Unit CostThe exact quantity depends on the manufacturing location, component sourcing, and specific variant:Domestic Production Baseline ($35,000 / unit): Yields exactly 3,750 drones. This is the standard open-source estimate for mass production of the baseline Shahed-136.Optimized Bulk Production ($20,000 / unit): Yields up to 6,562 drones. This represents stripped-down configurations produced under highly efficient, large-scale industrial conditions.Advanced Variants ($50,000 / unit): Yields 2,625 drones. This accounts for variants equipped with upgraded guidance packages, localized Russian "Geran-2" iterations, or specialized modifications.Procurement Cost vs. Production CostIf you look beyond pure factory manufacturing costs to foreign military sales (FMS) / export costs, the numbers shift considerably:Leaked Export Pricing ($193,000 / unit): Yields roughly 680 drones. Leaked documents detailing the initial technology transfers and localized assembly licensing agreements between Iran and Russia show that initial premium batch orders cost considerably more due to integrated technology, equipment, and software licensing fees amortized into the purchase.tldr; about 3750 shahed drones that are basically just as effective
>>540609342that arsenal is only good for defense.how you gonna get 3750 shasneeds into ToC without getting Highway of deathed?
>>540608659China is still 10-20 years behind the West on jet engine technology.
>>540609602logistically drones are easier to move and weigh less. im sure they are working on ways to move them even more efficiently and possibly even drone carriers. and to answer your question, fighter drones or surface to air
>>540609819>10-20More like 2-5I would not underestimate China, they are on the fucking warpath
>>540609967With the new seek and destroy ai on a chip drones the cia estimates a Russian soldiers life expectancy on the front is ~30 minutes. Guess who makes the components
>>540608659>6th Gen fighter raceI thought crewed jet fighters had gone the way of the biplane now that all the cool kids are into drones.
>>540608659>jetsuseless things that don't even do what they were designed to do anymore. drones and missiles are the future.
>>540609819Cope.
>>540609967why even bother if you know you will get nuked if you are even partially succesful
>>540608659>Our stolen copy is better than your original
>>540608659I think it's neat that China is leapfrogging so much arms development.Take their bombers. Their bomber, the H-6, is a modified Soviet design from 1952. It's still in production. If all you want is a cruise missile launch platform, I'm sure it's plenty good enough. But then they're also making a full on three engine stealth bomber, which has already flown. So they're going from a 1952 bomber to a futuristic flying wing trijet bomber. It's kind of nuts to think about.
>>540609333They speedrun their growth in the shortest time in human kind. Things were not done organically and did not take centuries upon centuries. Even if they transcend intelligence and wisdom (they don't) sacrifices would still need to be made, and by sacrifices, i mean achievements built on the back of plebians. Now the question is whether or not they make the same mistake as the USSR. Stalin did the same, he made the most impressive advancements in tech tree and industrial output of any state in human history at his time and did it by abusing and traumatizing his people, but as soon as Brejnev too power, the aparachiks decided that they didn't have to try anymore and that they could life of what Stalin built and the oil money. Workers absenteeism went through the roof and corruption was tolerated. The blow back came as soon as the oil prices came down. Suddenly, they realized the world doesn't stop with you and a moutain of structural problems led them to beg the west to borrow their money.
>>540609342>With a $131.25 million USD budget, you could produce approximately 3,750 baseline Shahed-136 drones based on their average manufacturing costFirst, Shaheds don't cost Iran or China that much. That's the price for the US. Second, 3,750 shaheds are not necessarilya better deal than F-22s. To a nation that has a pocket as deep as the US or China, they should build both. Shaheds cannot carry heavy explosives and are one way drones that can't be reused. Iran could never do the same amount of destruction as Israel in Gaza with Shaheds.
>>540609326>That's a cool 3 render that will never actually exist like all that chinkshit those insects gloat about.You'd think people such as yourself learned their lesson already but evidently, you didn't.
>>540608659wow great make sure to produce lots of them now chang I'm sure they'll serve you well and nothing bad will happen to them
>>540608659>explodes outside of combat
>>540609819>China is still 10-20 years behind the West on jet engine technology.You're the one who's 10 to 20 years behind on the state of the Chinese tech tree.
>>540611643leapfrogging == steal techChina does not have the research and development expertise .. this is why they lack creativity as a nation
>>540612556component parts like fan blades are very specialised and only made by Rolls Royce, just like ASML hold the secrets of UV photo lithography.. the
>>540609333
RR stole their fan blad proxess from the Germans. It took them like 30 years to get them all working. I used to work there. All the okd employees saidnall the documentation was in hand written Germna until rhe 90s digitization. China has it fiured out. RR directly yold us they cannot compete in the Chinese aerospace market.They have an 'optional' fellow initiation process I did not pursue and they fired me even though I was the highest performer on my team. Most jewish masonic company Ive worked at by far.
