think about how this invention has altered humanity for the worsebefore firearms, the battlefield was basically survival of the fittestthe smartest, most fit men in general survived, the weak and stupid were culled the smart and strong would be appointed higher and higher positions of powernow you get firearms, and that goes away, you have more and more stupid weak people breeding, these stupid weak then start going into positions of powerso you go from being ruled by the smartest, to the dumbest ultimately, humanity needs to go back to swords and spears in order to survive
>>540613229>before firearms, the battlefield was basically survival of the fittest>the smartest, most fit men in general survivedcrossbows say hello
Im pretty sure the Roman legions were exactly like the US policemen, fat, retarded, corrupt, only fighting enemy 10vs1
>>540613229Nah, we've had throwing weapons, stones, slings, spears, bolas and atlatls for about as long as we've been a speciesIt's never been purely about brute strength for humans, we are the most dextrous and cunning organisms on earth for good reason.
Wrong. It still allowed parasite aristocracy (Jews) to control shit behind the scenes.
>>540613401do you not need a good deal of strength, hand eye coordination and smarts to use these?
>>540613229>the smartest, most fit men in general survived, the weak and stupid were culledyou know, there are the categories of stupid and fit men, and there are weak but smart menif you were to choose what is the best for humanity of these two, what would you choose?
>>540613229>ultimately, humanity needs to go back to swords and spears in order to survivepeople like you will die right away though
>>540613229No, before it was smash hundreds of men into each other until one side shits their pants, runs and gets cut down by cavalry. OP is a retarded faggot.
>>540613229>before firearms, the battlefield was basically survival of the fittestthe smartest, most fit men in general survived, the weak and stupid were culled As with all evolution fitness is a subjective response to particular circumstances. In war that comes down to logistics, training, and numbers. Pure and simple. The most fit is the side who works better as a team, has quality weapons, food to eat, knows where the enemy is, and knows where they are weakest. This changes little with firearms. Maybe you're thinking of the way niggers fight spontaneously 1v1, it certainly produces bigger and stronger niggers.
OP bemoans modern politicians for being stupid and weak and yet if he were in charge he'd futilely attempt to destroy the only thing that keeps him in charge. Maybe politicians deserve a break sometimes; at least they're not THAT dumb.
>>540613555Mostly the latter two.Humans are not that strong compared to most wild animals. You'd lose to most medium size creatures in 1v1 no weapons.
I was just thinking about how warfare was better when it was swords then I see this thread. Fucking aliens running the 4chonz
