A White man shot 2 BLACK AMERICAN teenagers for accidentally rummaging through his carhttps://fox2now.com/news/missouri/st-louis-man-charged-after-fatal-shooting-during-alleged-car-break-in/I’m White and want this faggot lynchedWe need to team up with black Americans dude
This is the foundational black American shot dead. His friend is in critical conditionRemember jews want you to be racistFuck thatLife in prison for Timothy Kemper (the shooter)
>>540618169>accidentally rummaging through his carkys
>>540618353Say Christ is King rn you fucking kike
>>540618169>accidentally rummaging through his carBigots do not understand the complex and ancient tradition of borrowing from your neighbor. Those two young bright men were merely borrowing items that would be returned at a future time.
>>540618169>accidentally rummaging
>>540618169I read here that he was charged with murder and guess what, I would shoot two niggers I caught breaking into my car as well, despite his charges, I would kill the fuck out of them still
>>540618436christ IS king, you fucking kike.
>>540618169>accidentallylol
>>540618169TOTAL NIGGER DEATH
>>540618169>accidental rummagers Add it to the list!
>rummagersadd it to the list
>>540618169Was he in the car when the nigger opened the door? If not he's screwed. It sounds like he was in his 1st or 2nd story window and popped off shots at the group at large.
It's like nobody here ever saw American History X.
>>540618169Don't pity people who die while committing a crime.
>>540618225>This is the foundational black American shot dead.When niggers sit for formal portraits do you think they might joke about whether or not this one will be the one used for the news story?
daily reminder leftards have absolutely nothing of value to offer as human beings
>>540618737I'll allow it.
>>540618169Reminder that the police are not there to protect you from criminals. Their job is to protect criminals from you. A society without police would have very few (living) criminals.
>>540618737You're right, but there's still some outs. If the person contained a gun, for example, and the man claims he saw that they had a gun while they were rummaging through his car, and the black guys did indeed have weapons on them, then the shooting would be considered justified.
>>540618875>Their job is to protect criminals from youUnironically true.If a criminal does not survive long enough to stand trial then the criminal's rights have been violated.
>>540618169>breaks into someone's car>gets shotNothing of value lost
>>540618169as opposed to black teens shooting each other for fun and clout. >>540618225blacks want me to be racist . Christ is KingAlso if he can afford to dress like that he can afford to not go through cars
>>540618225Good bait
>>540618169Wtf is up with white conservatives and killing children? It's like every white conservative male sets a daily goal for himself to find any excuse to shoot kids.
Just because the jewish system will punish him doesn't mean he did anything wrong.Lynching niggers is peak americana.
>>540619064>as opposed to black teens shooting each other for fun and clout.'Mutual Combat' not technically against the law.>blacks want me to be racistThat is a second-order conditional. No nigger on earth has an IQ that high.
>>540618737He should have gone down and confronted, the niggers likely would have given him a justifiable defense.
>>540619031A man who did the right thing just lost the rest of his life. I wish I could be on that jury.
>>540619196>Stop there black gentlemen from rummaging through my property >aaaw sawry mastah we didn do nuffinNigger please.....
>>540618169>“Surprising. Horrible. Can’t believe it,” said Jacob Levy. “It’s a lovely, quiet neighborhood. Nice restaurants, good folks, nice people. Not usually like that.”>Dave Hinson, who owns a nearby guitar store, said, “Around here, his is one of the safest neighborhoods in St. Louis.”>“Pretty scary,” Levy added. “I mean, a lot of horrible things happen. It’s shocking to know this could happen where you think you’re safe.”
>>540618855Yes. They unironically do joke about it. They brag about 'putting you on a shirt' because for some reason Niggers put dead Niggers they knew on cheap airbrushed t-shirts with 'Rest in power' or some other stupid shit.
>>540618169If the bullet holes are in the back you're gonna have problems. Legal hassle for even a justified defensive shooting is a huge pain in the ass and very expensive. Shooting some nigger for busting into your car just isn't worth it.
>>540619493>Waaah u can't shoot niggers goy if you do we're going to frame you
>>540618855>When niggers sit for formal portraits do you think they might joke about whether or not this one will be the one used for the news story?I am laughing..... amazing question!Or, do the negro parents wonder if this photo is good enough to win them the Trayvon Marti Negro Lottery (sue the neighbhood watch group)?
>>540618169Thats a jew and he did a good deed, these are the jews I like
I looked it up"No, you cannot legally shoot someone just for breaking into your car in St. Louis, Missouri, unless you are inside the vehicle or face an immediate threat to your life. Under Missouri law (RSMo 563.031)"Unfortunately it seems that Missouri law is cucked when it comes to the defense of property. The only time you can shoot someone breaking into your car is if it's acting as your personal dwelling. From what I'm understanding, Texas is the only state that has "narrow provisions" for using lethal force to defend property "at night"
>>540619731Prove it kike.
>>540619811what he should have done is put his pistol on something within arms reach of the front door, opened the door and confronted them and then shot them dead when they charged him with whatever crowbar they were using to try to jimmy his car open.
>>540619838>st. Louis manIf he was white it would have said white man
>>540619493At common law, and in New York statute, it was/is legal to back-shoot fleeing Robbers. Since this was done in his presense (at his home) and he was there, he can present evidence that he thought getting close(r) to the pair of theives would result in them using force upon his body while engaging in theft (hence, Robbery). I think it would go to a Jury, the issue of whether he reasonablly belived this was a Robbery in progress.
>>540619811Yeah even Ohio which is a open carry state you cant just shoot a nigger for looting your unoccupied car you're supposed to "yell, turn on floodlights, sound your car alarm, or physically grab and pull the thief away from your vehicle." with the last option getting you shot.
>>540619933>If he was white it would have said white manImmigrant? Maybe of the undocumented type?
>>540618169Dudes a hero. Hopefully both darkies die and then someone kills of their bloodline. Worthless apes
>>540619933St. Louis is not the ethnicity you fucking idiot nigger.
>>540620089Idk black hair and pointy beak is giving jew vibes and the lack of race baiting from the description is awfully suspicious
>>540620222You sir are retarded for saying that, they didnt say his race is the point. If he was white theyd have said it
>>540619811>Missouri law (RSMo 563.031)Not so fast. Severe threats: You may use deadly force only if you reasonably believe it is necessary to protect against death, serious physical injury, or any forcible felony. Robbery (Theft with threat of force) is a forcible felony. Since he was present there, the theft could reasonably be viewed as a Robbery. Suppose he sees two black bears in his car, and he thinks, what will happen to me if I walk closer to the car and pull the black bears out? I will be attacked, so I should not do that. Instead, I will shoot the black bears in my car to avoid being mauled... At common law, and in New York statute, it was/is legal to back-shoot fleeing Robbers. Since this was done in his presense (at his home) and he was there, he can present evidence that he thought getting close(r) to the pair of theives would result in them using force upon his body while engaging in theft (hence, Robbery). I think it would go to a Jury, the issue of whether he reasonablly belived this was a Robbery in progress.The problem is that he was a poor shot and did not completely kill both blacks, which means that the surviving black will LIE and say "dindu nuthin" and was "accidentally rummaging" etc, and I had no plan to violently attack nor curb stomp nor ground and pound the owner of the car if he did enter/arrive at the car to stop our dindunuthinings.... People who knowingly do wrong are usually willing to LIE about what they did and what was done because of what they did.... So, he did not shoot sufficiently well to fully terminate the robbery in progress.
>>540618169DUDE FUCK YES LOLOLOLOL
>>540619958>physically grab and pull the thief away from your vehiclethat is a stupid idea, that will result in the owner of the car being stabbed by the thief. So, the thief is reasonably suspected of being willing and intending to use force or violence upon the person of the owner if he moves to rescue his property. That should count as Robbery in Progress. Severe threats: You may use deadly force only if you reasonably believe it is necessary to protect against death, serious physical injury, or any forcible felony. Robbery (Theft with threat of force) is a forcible felony. Since he was present there, the theft could reasonably be viewed as a Robbery. Suppose he sees two black bears in his car, and he thinks, what will happen to me if I walk closer to the car and pull the black bears out? I will be attacked, so I should not do that. Instead, I will shoot the black bears in my car to avoid being mauled...At common law, and in New York statute, it was/is legal to back-shoot fleeing Robbers. Since this was done in his presense (at his home) and he was there, he can present evidence that he thought getting close(r) to the pair of theives would result in them using force upon his body while engaging in theft (hence, Robbery). I think it would go to a Jury, the issue of whether he reasonablly belived this was a Robbery in progress.The problem is that he was a poor shot and did not completely kill both blacks, which means that the surviving black will LIE and say "dindu nuthin" and was "accidentally rummaging" etc, and I had no plan to violently attack nor curb stomp nor ground and pound the owner of the car if he did enter/arrive at the car to stop our dindunuthinings.... People who knowingly do wrong are usually willing to LIE about what they did and what was done because of what they did.... So, he did not shoot sufficiently well to fully terminate the robbery in progress.
>>540618587kek this jew is seethingKing of the who?
>>540620234>and the lack of race baitingThat caught my attention as well
Bump
>>540618225Youre not white you filthy lying through your rat teeth fucken snipcock jew. Weak shit pulling the im white horseshit roflmao Youre among the dumbest kike shills to ever post here congrats
>>540618169The cops who arrested him should be shot, too.
>>540618169Jewish judges and police are domestic terrorists who should be executed along with their families, in minecraft. They are treasonous domestic terrorists occupying our government.
>>540620279What should the headline be in your mind?>White man kills nigger burglars in St. Louis? Fucking idiot.
>>540620468>White man kills nigger burglars in St. Louis?That SHOULD be the headline you fucking cuck.
>>540620468Are you new here? Lurk more, your ignorance is showing. Thats normally exactly how it would go minus the nigger and omitting the crime committed, theyd have made it sound like evil white racist murdered innocent school kids in cold blood
>>540620531You expect the jewish newspapers are going to release that kind of headlines?
>>540620402lmao gottem
>>540620402king of all things, you speak of the creator, do not look at the anchor and pretend to know the ship you gay retarded niggerfish.>>540620607suck mine next
>>540620586Okay show me those types of headlines then faggot liar jew.
>>540620716
Niggers aren't human. Not guilty.>>540619433Every single fucking time.
>>540620785
Whites are too honorable. Never turn yourself in. Never get arrested. The process is the punishment.
>>540618169>https://fox2now.com/news/missouri/st-louis-man-charged-after-fatal-shooting-during-alleged-car-break-in/>Kemper, who lived on the second floor of a nearby building, observed one individual from the group enter his car and rummage through it. A short time later, he retrieved his firearm and fired several shots at the group, per the probable cause statement.>Investigators say he struck two people, both who were dropped off at a hospital with gunshot wounds. One died from his injuries, while the other is being treated in critical condition.So, they were thieves, in an occupied neighborhood and went inside of his car, apparently to steal. He could rightfully approach and use non-deadly force to protect his vehicle and contents from the imminent theft. If he did so, the factual context of multiple blacks implies that the black gang intended to gang up upon the car's owner and attack him, to overcome his lawful nondeadly force and to complete the theft. So, the argument can be made that he lawfully used deadly physical force (shooting from a distance) necessary to prevent or terminate a Forcible Felony, a Robbery in Progress. The New York statute, based on model penal code, would support this justification argument, unless the "threat of force" must be explicit. The use of multiple blacks in gang formation to commit a daylight theft certainly IMPLIES a threat to use Physical Force upon the intervening owner of the property or upon anyone else who intervenes. The Law does or should allow the owner of the vehicle to shoot (from a safe distance) and kill all the feral blacks gathered around in support of the black felon actually inside the vehicle. Severe threats: You may use deadly force only if you reasonably believe it is necessary to protect against death, serious physical injury, or any forcible felony. Robbery (Theft with threat of force) is a forcible felony. Since he was present there, the theft could reasonably be viewed as a Robbery.
>>540618169>accidentallywelp, I accidentally shot your thieving nigger ass, and your friend tooACCIDENT I SO SOWWY :_:
>>540621122In Best Virginia your car is part of your house.Nigger opens your car door? That is the same as opening the front door to your house. Simple as.
>>540618436Christ is King (of the Jews)
>>540621286>ACCIDENT I SO SOWWY :_:kekIt was a just a negligent discharge, why are you so upset?
>>540618169>accidentally rummaging through his carWhat timmy gonna do, right? You won't do shit, right? Fuck around and find out, niggers!
Not even Canadians get convicted for shooting car rummaging youths. Wtf America.
if a nigger killed those niggers nobody would know or care>DHEY JUS TEEEN DHEY DINDUNUFFINMUDAFUGGGAH
>>540620606No, I do not.
>>540621122>The use of multiple blacks in gang formation to commit a daylight theft certainly IMPLIES a threat to use Physical Force upon the intervening owner of the property or upon anyone else who intervenes. The Law does or should allow the owner of the vehicle to shoot (from a safe distance) and kill all the feral blacks gathered around in support of the black felon actually inside the vehicle.>Severe threats: You may use deadly force only if you reasonably believe it is necessary to protect against death, serious physical injury, or any forcible felony. Robbery (Theft with threat of force) is a forcible felony. Since he was present there, the theft could reasonably be viewed as a Robbery.> https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=563.031 2. A person shall not use deadly force upon another person under the circumstances specified in subsection 1 of this section unless: (1) He or she reasonably believes that such deadly force is necessary to protect himself, or herself or her unborn child, or another against death, serious physical injury, or any forcible felony; (2) Such force is used against a person who unlawfully enters, remains after unlawfully entering, or attempts to unlawfully enter a dwelling, residence, or vehicle lawfully occupied by such person; or (3) Such force is used against a person who unlawfully enters, remains after unlawfully entering, or attempts to unlawfully enter private property that is owned or leased by an individual, or is occupied by an individual who has been given specific authority by the property owner to occupy the property, claiming a justification of using protective force under this section. 3. A person does not have a duty to retreat: (1) From a dwelling, residence, or vehicle where the person is not unlawfully entering or unlawfully remaining;.. (3) If the person is in any other location such person has the right to be.
>>540621648>2. A person [may] use deadly force upon another person under the circumstances specified in subsection 1 of this section [if]:>(1) He or she reasonably believes that such deadly force is necessary to protect himself ... against death, serious physical injury, or any forcible felony;"The owner of the car certainly could have reasonabbly apprehended that he would suffer "death, serious physical injury" if he lawfully approached his vehicle to forcibly or otherwise stop the theft in progress. Hence, he could have reasonably believed that the use of deadly physical force was necessary to "protect him] against or any forcible felony [i.e., Robbery in Progress].The shooter can make a valid Justification Defense argument under the terms of this statute as it is broadly written. The statute language does not even require him to prove any degree of "imminent" use or threat of deadly force by the thieves. The statute should be construed to permit the victim of black gang thievery in progress to shoot and kill all the feral black participants whose physical presence and participation in the theft creates the IMPLIED THREAT of Force or violence upon the owner of the property being stolen. The case is no different than a gang of Vikings arriving at your Barn and "accidentally rummaging" (to forcibly steal your goats or your equipment, or an axe) and you and your family use your cross-bows to kill them all from a safe distance.
>>540622099>The case is no different than a gang of Vikings arriving at your Barn and "accidentally rummaging" (to forcibly steal your goats or your equipment, or an axe) and you and your family use your cross-bows to kill them all from a safe distance.The case is no different than a gang of tribal indians arriving at your Barn and "accidentally rummaging" (to forcibly steal your goats or your equipment, or an axe) and you and your family use your rifles to kill them all from a safe distance. The White Man's Law and His Civilization is more important than the lives of a gang of feral black thieves, who use their numbers as an IMPLIED THREAT of Force and Violence to overcom resistance to Thefts they commit or openly aide and abett.
>>540618463>Black>future time.Annon....
>>540618169>accidentallyYeah sure, i heard it all before
>>540621438Christ is King of Kings and Lord of Lords. You sure ain’t. You don’t sound like a King or a Lord, your mom probably has the pay monthly rent on the toilet she doesn’t own
>>540622860>Christ is King of Kings and Lord of Lordskek this is some game of thrones tier larp lmaodo you go into church and start speaking tongues and handing deadly snakes too? hahahaha
>>540622918Not a larp, many Kings accepted Jesus Christ as their Lord, their savior, and their master. Your mom knows all about handling snakes, fuck around and caught a cobra strike from the King Cobra himself. Your mom knows all about handling snakes, fuck around and caught a cobra strike from the King Cobra himself. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RsXi6-L9P3I&ra=m
>>540618436You guys have really upped the spam with that in completely nonsensical places recently. Duly noted
>>540623391>mental illness personifiedjust supports my theory that every hyper religious retard is mentall ill and their "faith" is the only thing keeping you from blowing your brains out
>>540623773Your mental illness is thinking you’re not retarded because you sound like the most pathetic retarded faggot I’ve ever heard. And I’ve listened to Daniel Larsons hit song roaring thunder
>>540623958>namefag>bible literalist>screeching CHRIST IS KIIINNGG autism fithahah you're a nut, stupid fuck and you don't even know it
>>540618169
>>540618436>say kike is king right now you fucking kikeFirst of all, we all know you're a leftist nigger who supports palestine so no one thinks you're based for saying kike. Second off, no one is retarded enough to think the jews fear whites abandoning their racial religions to worship a kike.
>>540624031As you post a picture your favorite cartoon hero. Youre a clown, everyone thinks so too, even if they don’t tell you to your face because they know you’ll throw a pissy pants hissy fit
>>540624135>nameflag memeflag jew projecting his insecurities onto otherskek, you dont fool anyone jew with your christnigger hyperbole autism
>>540624553I’m not trying to fool anyone, a true Israelite is one in whom there is no deceit. “Here’s a true son of Isra’el — nothing false in him!“ I think the deceiver here is you, certainly on your side.
>>540624084>who supports palestine"Free Palestine" means "ReOpen the AntiRacist Islamic Slave Markets in Palestine"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_PalestineA blonde yazidi woman enslaved in Gaza was freed by Israel in 2024.https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpw5v077nyjoFawzia Amin Sido, a 21-year-old Yazidi woman enslaved by ISIS at age 11 and later trafficked to Gaza, was rescued in October 2024 through a coordinated secret operation involving the United States, Israel, Jordan, and Iraq.See "The Geopolitical and Legal History of White Warfare Against Enslavement" https://write.as/mwq381bw4r7ms.mdARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT against Chief Justice Roberts https://write.as/q1jc2dzd56xhp.mdDraft Petition for ReHearing in Trump v. Barbara https://write.as/edit/6j8azq11mfs94https://www.civitasoutlook.com/research/the-constitution-birthright-citizenship-and-a-self-governing-republic?124c3630_page=1
>>540618169>>>540622320>> https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=563.031> *563.031. Use of force in defense of persons. — 1. A person may, subject to the provisions of subsection 2 of this section, use physical force upon another person when and to the extent he or she reasonably believes such force to be necessary to defend himself or herself or a third person from what he or she reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful force by such other person, ...> 2. A person [may] use deadly force upon another person under the circumstances specified in subsection 1 of this section [if]:> (1) He or she reasonably believes that such deadly force is necessary to protect himself, or herself or her unborn child, or another against death, serious physical injury, or any forcible felony;">So, the word "imminent" is in "subsection 1" as follows:>"when and to the extent he or she reasonably believes such force to be necessary to defend himself or herself or a third person from what he or she reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful force by such other person">The time span involved in this case was the short time it would take for the owner to sprint at arrive at the vehicle or midway to the vehicle (at the midway point or sooner he could be attacked by the feral black gangsters) to forcibly stop the theft in progress. So, a Jury could conclude that the unlawful use of Black Robber Gang force and violence upon the shooter was "imminent". Thus, the owner of the vehicle being looted/stolen has a prima facie justification for using deadly physical force to protect against the forcible felony of black gang robbery.
OP charged for accidentally being a 3pbtid faggot.
>>540618225zesty
>>540626008I couldn’t care less what you think of me anon. I only said Christ is King once, and he is, like I told the other faggot, it certainly ain’t you boy.
>>540618169>A White man shot ...s for accidentally rummaging through his car>I’m White and want this faggot lynched>We need to team up with black Americans dudeYou are the enemy of Civilization itself, since you actively desire to facilitate roving black gangs moving around stealing in broad daylight, carrying with them unknown weapons, and implied intention to use force and violence of their hands and feet and teeth to overcome resistance by white victims of violent felonies (robbery). Anyone who knows who you are that reads what you posted here should do the honors of performing the duty of "faggot lynched" is YOU. You are a psychopath enemy of civilization itself.
>>540618737> https://armedcitizensnetwork.org/intitial-agressor-2Fleming: You’ve heard the catch phrase, “I deserve a jury of my peers.” Really? Well, let’s think about that for a minute or two. At 3 o’clock on a summer morning, you’re awakened by sounds coming through your screen window and you go outside and you find this guy who is going through your car. You confront this individual and he comes boiling out of the car with a tool. I specifically say “tool” because I don’t want people thinking about this in terms of weapons versus non-weapons, so let’s say that he comes up out of the back of your car with a Pepsi bottle. Don’t freeze up trying to figure out, “Is that a weapon or is it a Pepsi?” No, you should ask yourself, “Is it a tool?” Yes, it is a tool that can be used to fracture your skull and kill you.If this happens and you end up pulling the gun and shoot and stop this individual, maybe you’ll get charged because the prosecutor is over-zealous or because the prosecutor has a political motive because it is election year–who knows? How many of people filing in at the beginning of a trial to become part of the jury are your peers? How many of them have gone through that experience such that they will understand what you dealt with? The chances are extremely small that you are going to encounter anybody like that and if there is, the prosecutor will kick them out of that jury pool just as quick as they can because they don’t want people like that on the jury....the defense attorney’s job is to present the defense case in such a way that it turns jurors into a jury of your peers by creating an understanding of the issues and the actions and the decision. As part of the trial process, I’m trying to create an understanding in the minds of those jurors so that they can put themselves in the shoes of this person who has been accused and charged, to decide whether they were justified in what they were doing.
>>540618169>accidentally rummaging through his car
>>Suggest a correction button at bottom of articleWhy don't we write Fox2 a correction?
>>540618169Missouri has the castle doctrine enacted. He should not have been arrested and had every right to protect his property. >>A castle doctrine, also known as a castle law or a defense of habitation law, is a legal doctrine that designates a person's abode or any legally occupied place (for example, an automobile or a home) as a place in which that person has protections and immunities permitting one, in certain circumstances, to use force (up to and including deadly force) to defend oneself against an intruder, free from legal prosecution for the consequences of the force used.
>>540618169The feral Black Gang, taking after their Icon George Floyd and his gang of Black Robbers, had at least one gun, which was dropped after they were fired upon.https www.facebook reportedly-by-og-ron-timothy-kemper-39-of-st-louis-missouri-has-been-charged-witMore evidence that OP and the News Reporters are irresponsible and worthless WhiteTraitor Trash who should be "lynched" a>Tami AguileraVicki Roettger Yes they were armed. There were 4 of them that constantly target people in the neighborhood. One dropped their firearm as the scene.This was clearly an ARMED ROBBERY IN PROGRESS and thus a "Violent Felony" that Mr. Kempler had a PERFECT LEGAL RIGHT TO terminate by immediate resort to projected FORCE (Sending a bullet flying at the ARMED ROBBERS). He knew their reputation and he knew they intended to use violence to complete the theft and so he had no legal obligation to wait until the ARMED ROBBERS drew and aimed their Gun(s) AT HIM before firing defensive shots at the ARMED ROBBERS.And see sad message from Danielle Kemper, sister of the hero in this story, in link in the above facebook page.
>>540627546its a unoccupied car and states value "lives" over property. This dudes going to jail over losing $1 in change.
>>540618169>>540618225>>540618436criminals, piss and shit on the talmud
>>540628140Tim had a perfect right to presume that the four black felons in/at his car were ARMED with Guns, because the Fourteenth Amendment granted them citizenship and the State Constitutions states: "Article I Section 23. That the right of every citizen to keep and bear arms, ammunition, and accessories typical to the normal function of such arms,... shall not be questioned. The rights guaranteed by this section shall be unalienable. Any restriction on these rights shall be subject to strict scrutiny and the state of Missouri shall be obligated to uphold these rights and shall under no circumstances decline to protect against their infringement."Thus, the four black robbers were, immediately upon being seen in/stealing Tim's car, engaged in presumably-armed Robbers engaged in Armed Robbery, and as such they could be lawfully shot and killed to "protect against... forcible felony" of robbery. There is no legitimate intepretation of the statute that requires a man to hesititate before firing his gun upon presumably-ARMED ROBBERS currently engaged in ROBBERY in his presence.
>>540630096>car and states value "lives" over property.It was an ARMED ROBBERY being committed by four Armed Black Gangsters and the owner/victim Tim had a perfect legal right to shoot and to kill all four of the black Robbers to "protect against ... forcible felony" in progress. And, one of the four black gansters dropped his gun after being fired upon by the law abiding car owner, Tim.
U can tell he racist from his face..
>>540618169>accidentally
>>5406181692 down 50 mil to go. White Mexican alliance. Fuck jewish ICE>>540618225>>540618654>>540618737>>540618794
