Women really look at this and say, "Yeah. I can kill that."
>>540621200>Women are evilAncient knowledge being rediscovered in 2026
>>540621200Nobody's going to do an abortion on a 9 month old fetus, idiot.That said, I think women should have the right to abort up to 2 years old anyway. I support post-natal abortion for the same reason I support pre-natal abortion. Up until the age that a child stops being totally dependent on its mother, the mother has the natural right to withdraw care and kill it.
>>540621510does the father have the natural right to not provide child support?
>>540621200PREGNANT WOMAN???Cool it with the bigotry pal. We know it's pregnant person.
>>540621537No. Someone's got to, and there's no reason the taxpayer should be on the hook if the father's around.
>>540621620so a woman can withdraw care but not a man?
>>540621637Women can't withdraw care from existing children, that's child neglect
>>540621637Correct. Nature says that young children depend on their mothers for care. Take it up with the state of biology.
>>540621679right, so if they depend on the mother for care, then they do not need a father. child support is therefore unnatural.
>>540621200Late term abortions werw only a thing for stillborn babies and insane risk for the woman. This is why incels will never have wives or families. They choose not to.
>>540621672How are you going to stop them, though?May as well accept that in a few cases, women don't want to care for their children, and should have the right to kill them provided they're under a certain age.
>>540621383Make sure all the immegrants have to have babies. You won!
>>540621708The mother cares for the children, the father provides for the mother. Since children are an interest of the state, we can't really force women to have children, but we can force men to support their own children.
Yes.In fact, I defenetly would kill it.No, not joking.It's why I have always used logic to combat perhaps illogical emotional imbalances within me. Saves me the problems and others, works well. Yes.
>>540621200Meanwhile in Massachusetts psychopathiic women legalizing murder up to birth
>>540621785why can we not force children to be produced if the state has an interest in the production of children?
>>540621200men really look at this and then look at women murdering their own children and shrug and say "meh not my problem" and "but women _should_ have human rights"if you think holes should have human rights or that they should be allowed to kill kids then you're part of the problem
>>540621200Not if the babby is that color
>>540621200BY GAWD ALL MIGHTY WE MUST SAVE THEM NIGGER BABIES
>>540621715What’s funny about Chads and Incels is they both understand what women really are. It’s the cucks in the middle like you who refuse to get it. Enjoy your divorce rape dipshit. Repeal the 19th.
>>540621956Most chads support abortions because they impregnate women and don't want kids yet
>>540621200FOIDSLOP THREAD WOOO
>>540621200I can't imagine my pee hole being so close to my poop hole. What a biological horror.
>>540621200When I was born, I instantly teleported out of the womb behind the doctor and said, nothing personal kid.
>>540621200>>540621383Killing fully formed 9-month-old babies isn't that much worse than what they've already been doing for decades.
>>540621722You can anonymously give up a child for adoption for this very reason
