[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: British girl.webm (3.96 MB, 450x800)
3.96 MB
3.96 MB WEBM
>17-year-old Beth Knight was at a London train station when she was approached by a man. She didn't know at the time, but she was being secretly filmed on his Meta glasses. She tells Channel 4 News she was "terrified" and didn't know how the interaction would end.

>Billed as the latest high-tech must have, there's growing backlash against Meta's smart glasses amid evidence some users are secretly filming women without their knowledge or consent.
>>
I believe that people who act like nuisances in public or go around filming randoms on the street without permission for "content" should be sent to a minimum of five years hard labor. All TikTok pranksters deserve the Gulag.
>>
>>540669956
Based.
>>
>yellow khazar eyes
>protuberant lower lip
>attached earlobe
>eyes slightly above ear line
>kvetching about shit
Nice nose job though.
>>
>>540669956
Based. Also, can someone post the original video? Guaranteed it's almost certainly a fucking jeet or a paki pulling this shit.
>>
>>540669657
Who cares? Hot women are used to being ogled and mid women (like that one) should shut the fuck up
>>
>>540669657
>>540669956
>>540670034

>17
Around Half of Americans are retards that think 17 year olds are children, even though they damn well know that you can't tell a 16yo apart from a 21yo without id verification.
>>
>>540669657
> knight
> is afraid of being seen
that's a ninja
>>
>>540669657
Whats that shit on her chest skin?
>>
>>540670156
Why are you making this about her age when no one brought it up in this thread? My grievance isn't with her being 17, my grievance is with anti-social faggots who think the world revolves around them and that strangers are their little content toys.
>>
17? practically a newborn
>>
>>540670098
“From his deeds one can recognize the Nordic man, not from the length of his nose and the color of his eyes.” Even the Nazis acknowledged you can't safely deduce someones ancestry off of phenotype alone, yet chuds still pull out the scallopers and think they're onto something.
>>
>>540670098
Shut the fuck up, gypsy.
>>
File: hitler1784877729125288.jpg (94 KB, 1080x573)
94 KB JPG
>>540670098
>>
File: 1747420919229848.jpg (135 KB, 1024x1024)
135 KB JPG
At what perchance wold have been her voting stratagem?
>>
File: wall of potter.jpg (125 KB, 1024x764)
125 KB JPG
>>540670237
She's walling fast. Looks 29-31 to me.Must be the goyslop we eat now.
>>
>>540670223

Because the person in the OP video is obviously not a child & no amount of feminist gaslighting or magical number theory will change that readily obvious biological fact.
>>
>>540669657
Good that we can bring back the term glasshole though
>>
>>540670627
Anglo genes
>>540670237
If a boy then suddenly almost an adult and knows better
>>540669657
Learn to let it go. You’re always being recorded by security or anyone waving their phones
The glasses are no different . At least you can’t be gaslit
>>
>>540669657
>unauthorized, non-consensual recording
In many US states, this is highly illegal. Not sure about Bongland, and with their two-tiered justice system if the recorder was a brown, the court would force the girl to marry him.
The real solution to being ambushed by "influencers" in this manner is pepper or OC spray.
>>
>>540669956

Based, but I'd prefer for it to be punishable Singapore / South Asia style - by canning.

>>540669657

There should be a law where you are 100% allowed to smash any electronic equipmemt that smug fuckers use in your face. Or to use some cheap chinese jammers that fry such equipment.

I rage incredibly hard when I see subhumans like americans discussing video made by some random asshole walking with phone filming and acting like a dick to normal people.

Only one filming should be acceptable - bodycams of police shooting niggers.
>>
>>540671123
Incorrect. In the vast majority of states you have zero right to privacy in public and anyone can record you in a public setting.

The "consent" rules around recording apply to PRIVATE settings and are dubiously enforced at best. You have no idea what you are talking about.
>>
>>540669956
Smartphone is the worst human invention.
>>
File: HOeAOkBb0AAp7KZ.jpg (44 KB, 1199x674)
44 KB JPG
>>540669956
There is a faster and easier solution which has been shown to be incredibly effective at curbing antisocial behaviour in public
>>
>>540669657
Must of been a white man, a non-white would of beat and raped her and SHE would of been arrested instead.
>>
>>540669657

She was happy to be approached and even flirted with the guy.

What she didnt like was when it got posted and her boyfriend realised what a whore she was.
>>
>>540671409
So video recording doesn't follow wiretap laws? Interesting.
>>
>>540672083
She did not
>>
>>540669956
And yet the Somail nigger was sentenced to only 6 months.
Korea was the best chance + they had the whole worlds support and they cucked out.
So now it will get even worse.
>>
>>540671500
No giving it to browns was the worst decison.
its 300 years ahead of their mental and societal development.

>>540672083
Till clear evidence beyond a adoubt show up, thats what it propably was.
>>
>>540672271
>>540671123
Man, lmao, you are really fucking dumb.
>>
>>540669657
There are like 5 cameras filming you without you consent at any given moment anywhere you might be in a big city.
But whatever, i despise meta more than almost anything and if this hurts them than good.
>>
>>540669657
>an ugly older man approached me and filmed me!
>>
>>540669657
>he saw the holy vagina
>without paying
>without heckin paying!
>im literally shaking at the violation
>>
>>540669657
>muslim rape gangs?
>who cares
>whaddabout these glasses...
Grim
>>
>>540669657
That's a slampig anon, not a "girl", Pakis will breed that pigussy
>>
>>540670156
Found the pedo.
Hang yourself.
>>
>>540669657
Isn't it currently Summer in Europe and you're currently facing record breaking heatwaves? Why is everyone in this video wearing winter clothes? Scarfs, thick padded jackets
>>
>>540669657
Your other thread about this is still up faggot
>>
>>540669956
No expectation of privacy in public. First amendment guarantees the right to record.
>>
>>540669657
this phenotype has to be removed from the gene pool
>>
>>540670644
Stop fucking kids bro
>>
>>540669657
niggers are raping 12 year old british kids and they are still pretending to be first world
>>
>>540669657
this bitch isn't 17. she's in her 30s. she uses filters in her tiktok vids that makes her look like a 12 year old loli and she wears pajamas in all her vids. she probably ran to the news and asked them to do a story to boost her channel.
>>
>>540675130
She is 17 you dunce
>>
>>540674807
>Stop raping 35 year old fridge bodied 5’11 kids bro
>>
>>540674747
Bro that lady is pushing 40
>>
>>540675718
Yeah sure she is kike. She’s definitely not a 37 year old alcoholic single mom right? Retard jew
>>
>>540670156
17 year olds are children. They're still at school you nonce.
>>
Its a jeet sigma motivation edit isn't it?
>>
>>540669657
>>540675969
Shes part of the round teeth tribe.
>>
>>540669657
Nobody cares femoid if the guy was a chad you would have said you have no boyfriend
>>
>>540669657
>are secretly filming women without their knowledge or consent.
There's no real expectation of privacy in public. You can take pictures of people in public, there's no law being broken, so why is this news?
>>
>>540677332
>why is this news?
A woman was terrified.
>of what
Men
>men?
Well, a man
>doing what?
Being near her
>and?
She was terrified!
>>
>>540678018
-This comment brought to you by Brian Michael Bendis.
>>
>>540677332
It’s wrong to post videos of children without their permission
>>
>>540678082
Lmao
>>
>>540678652
No it isn't.
>>
Some day soon somebody is going to upload a torrent of 50 TB of footage from some contractor's DB in botswana of unfiltered, uncensored Meta Glasses footage that was sent over for AI learning classification and it's going to be incredible.

People who did nothing wrong, don't have facebook accounts and have otherwise practiced fairly tech savvy personal password and security measures but didn't know what Meta glasses were are going to be international porn stars overnight.
>>
>>540669956
>I don't like something therefore LE BIG GOVERNMENT HAS TO INTERVENE
Holy cuck
>>
>>540674612

the constitution is viewed as a niusance by a lot of people
>>
>>540671258
>by canning.
>>
>>540669657
why does that terrify her more than feral migrant nigers bouncing around her streets with machetes?
>>
>>540680731
Yes it is
>>
>>540669657
>without their knowledge or consent.
?
so? you are in a public space. fucking retards
>>
>>540670098
Thank you for your service.
>>
>>540670627
cho chang NOOOOOOOOOO
>>
>>540680852
Correct, the government should work in my favor to subjugate people I personally find annoying.
>>
Say the girl in the most surveillanced country in the world with record number cameras
>>
>>540669657
Has the AI undressed her yet? I need more models for the holodeck
>>
>>540669956
They should be guillotined,
>>
>>540674612
Freedom is worth protecting because it is good. Harassing people for social media is evil and underminds the 1st Amendment's legitimacy when the two are conflated.
>>
I've already resolved to punch the first person I see wearing these in the face, in the hope of normalising it.

The answer is usually violence, whatever the question, violence delivers an outcome
>>
Filming laws are woefully out of date in the age of mass recording devices. It should be illegal to film people without their consent unless they are committing a crime.
>>
>>540669657
>secretly filming
They have a light that shows when they are filming
>>
>>540670098
>eyes slightly above ear line
There's no such thing except for in extreme cases of deformity. Whether or not someone's eyes appear to be above or below their ears depends on the angle they're holding their head. Ears are in line with the neck and eyes are forward of it, so if you tilt your head up then your eyes will pivot around the center point while your ears will more or less rotate in place. If someone has a confident, chin-up posture, their ears will appear below their eyes.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.