[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1766940847083285.png (665 KB, 2634x1312)
665 KB PNG
should the DSA break away from the democrat party? it's obvious there's a civil war and the dems are alienating people by being associated with the DSA; but also the DSA are alienating people by being associated with the democrats. there should be two left wing parties in the US
also, the ABSOLUTE STATE of the polling in these two races
>both DSA candidates up by over 30%
>end up within 1%
>>
File: 1774671901708169.jpg (81 KB, 900x900)
81 KB JPG
There should also be two right wing parties in the USA.
>>
>>540675930
the nationalists have almost completely taken over the GOP, and that's because it has had over 10 years to do it. meanwhile in 2016 the democrats suppressed their populist uprising unlike the GOP and it stayed suppressed until now that they're unpopular and leaderless.
if bernie hadn't cucked to hillary and turned into a neoliberal stooge for a decade bringing along all his populist voters to become useful idiots; there would be a socialist party and a nationalist party.

then we could've had national socialism :(
>>
>>540675846
You can have only two parties in an election with your electoral system
>>
>>540675846
Kikes are really upset it's not looking great for them
>>
File: 1782664539262784.png (183 KB, 1400x1986)
183 KB PNG
>>540676105
that's not true. we actually have many parties, but the "independent" party is just so dispersed and unorganized none of them have a chance. the libertarian party always nominates someone but it's some weirdo that no one takes seriously.
reminder there are more independents than republicans or democrats. we're almost a majority actually.
I'm an independent, but in my state we have closed primaries meaning I can't vote in dem/GOP primaries unless I switch parties. So I usually just vote in the general.
>>
>>540676237
Doesn't it split the vote if you have three or more parties in an election?
As in district A has two right wing parties and one left wing
RW1 gets 30%
RW2 gets 30%
LW gets 40%
Then the left wing candidate wins even though 60% wanted a right-wing one
>>
>>540676542
We have primary and general elections
>primary1 is left vs left
>primary2 is right vs right
>general is winner of left vs winner of right
that's how it is in almost all states, it's very hard for a 3rd party to make it on the ballot in state general elections. so that would mean RW1 and RW2 would go at it in the primary; and LW1 and LW2 would too; then the winners meet in the general.
>>
>>540675846
The year is 2016:
>Should MAGA break away from the Republican Party? It's obvious there's a civil war going on... MAGA is alienating people by being associated with Republicans...
>>
File: 1781391765753528.png (108 KB, 968x866)
108 KB PNG
>>540675846
>there should be two left wing parties in the US
The DSA would be the first leftwing party in the US, if we're going by world standards
>>
>>540676845
I forgot about the Greens, but no one gives a fuck about them
>>
>>540676837
Not really, it was clear MAGA took over the GOP in 2016, it just takes a long time to consolidate that hold. The DSA doesn't have a hold over the establishment neolibs. The establishment neocons folded immediately. Schumer, Pelosi, Hillary, etc are still hanging on to power.
>>
>>540676845
all of those people in that image consider jews and niggers human, therefor this chart is meaningless
>>
>>540676689
That's true. Wouldn't it then be hard for the DSA to totally break off from the Democrats? Because to vote for the primary you (often) have to a member of that party if I understand correctly
>>
>>540677010
>Wouldn't it then be hard for the DSA to totally break off from the Democrats?
Possibly, it depends how real the effort behind them is and how much money they have. Just judging by these primaries where it's basically a 50-50 split, they definitely have enough support to get on primary ballots I think.
>>
>>540676070
The problem is you'd have to have a jew with a spine.
>>
>>540676542
Yes. First past the post has an equilibrium state of two viable parties. This only changes when one party self destructs, making the other party temporarily unchallenged, and allowing a former minor party to gather up opposition interest.
>>
>>540675846
>there should be two left wing parties in the US
No, you stupid jew. We are not falling for your tricks. Third parties have no chance in this two party system.
>>
>>540675846
They exist to be totally absorbed by the party in the exact same way that MAGA is largely indistinguishable from Dubya era Republicans

They’re gonna say Obama and early BLM was based and bluepilled, they will not create universal healthcare.
>>
>>540678248
>We
you're a foreigner



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.