don't question the authecnity of this
>>540678115>don't question the authecnity of thisok i won't
I misspell words too. You must be me!
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/image/dit2QaR3KeYzZojKZMI3fw/type/op/Nearing the 10 year anniversary of this spam. What a depressing waste of life.
>>540678259You doing God's work.
who was holding the camera
https://youtu.be/SYjhdJM_hx0?l&t=127
>>540678115Ok i won't. It's a good thing the soviet trannies lost the space race
>>540678715He made the ultimate sacrifice for murica
>>540678115Magic of the trick is twofoldThey had to get something on the Moon to be there as proof of visit but at same time they knew chances that astronaut crew survives the mission are bellow 1%So, unload cargo on the Moon and film the astronaut shit in studio.They probably could send them there, but risk of failure was too high as it is even now.
>>540678115>hurr they lied about the moon landingName a single fucking other time the government lied about anything, schizo.
>>540678715The lunar rover on Apollo 15, 16 and 17 all had a remotely-operable TV cameraThe astronauts were instructed to park the rover a certain distance away and the commands were relayed from Mission ControlBecause of time lag, the motion was preplanned ahead of time and issued 2 seconds ahead of the countdownOn Apollo 15 the tilt mechanism malfunctionedOn Apollo 16 the rover was parked too close, so the planned controls did not keep the ascent stage centeredThey got it (mostly) right on Apollo 17All 3 videos are found herehttps://youtu.be/fLlt9ZdCAfU?t=64Further sourceshttps://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N38K1VM/https://www.redsharknews.com/technology-computing/item/2742-how-nasa-captured-lunar-lift-offhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMHLvoWZfqQ&t=280s
>>540679523Why wouldn’t they remotely operate it from the lander?>weight concernsFuck off, they brought a whole as extra camera with a Tripod just to do a roll credits shot.
>>540679504GNFOS
