Is there any refutation to this?
>>540694025Hegellian Dialectics.If you believe two-party politics are real, you don't know anything.
it's wrong
>>540694304Seethe all you want, you know he's right.
>>540694025
>>540694025None at all, we're fucked, Jews, it's over
>>540694025nope
>>540694025>Democrats>BolsheviksThey wouldn't be so based. For all their flaws Lenin and Stalin at least wanted the USSR to be a powerful nation. Neoliberals have built their entire policy on global equity, offshoring all industry, global free trade, foreign aid, and bringing in migrants for humanitarian reasons. If you want a singular reason for the rise of China as a global power it's neoliberalism, free trade, the WTO, and a refusal to play hard ball with China because they're poor, oppressed non-whites who live on a diet of nothing but unseasoned white rice even as they're the workshop of the world with the largest shipbuilding, electronics, and automobile industries.>Republicans>Every God ValidMaybe in wording but their policies and quotes make it clear that they regard Catholics as not even being Christian. Remember some famous religious talking head outright laughing about Hinduism, which fair enough, but it isn't as though a Jew on a stick is a more logical theological basis than a six armed blue man who reincarnates as a human every few hundred generations. Either way they are clear they hate muslims and only tolerate poos.Otherwise though, yeah, pretty much.
>>540694025Nope, it's true. Better yet, they are the same people
>>540694025no its perfectshould replace /pol/ logical fallacies sticky that no one every reads anyway
>>540694025there is
