[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1783203049227855.jpg (206 KB, 1206x1194)
206 KB JPG
How long until websites start range banning India? The first website to completely ban India from visiting will gain a huge amount of visitors. I mean it's no secret that almost every memeflag is either indian or israeli.
>>
Have you been to the city? Everywhere is India now. They outnumber everyone in every place.

They breed like insects, and soon your entire population will consist of them and only them.
>>
Tiktok is still banned in India.

Ah if only jews didn't take it over. We would still have it good.
>>
>>540710896
2 sites that used to be good that are now jeeted beyond repair are Quora and Hacker News. Completely ruined should have range banned.

Lobste.rs requires an invite still at least so theoretically less jeets
>>
File: 1786380247133292.jpg (30 KB, 615x587)
30 KB JPG
>>540711082
jeets started to invade my country either
>>
File: GDcCIn5XYAAoJBz.jpg (96 KB, 950x935)
96 KB JPG
>>540710896
>I need my safe spaccceeeee rreeeeeeee

>>540711082
>2.1 replacement rate
Disingenuous kike.
>>
>>540711590
There's no country on the planet they haven't infested. I recall someone in rural africa mentioning some jeets had opened a shop there.
>>
File: 1786577048020168.jpg (60 KB, 680x544)
60 KB JPG
>>540710896
mort
>>
>>540711701
FECALOIDS LIKE YOU WILL NEVER BE HUMAN RANJEET
>>
File: 1758227734836140.jpg (88 KB, 485x720)
88 KB JPG
>>540711743
500k soon
>>
>>540710896
You won't see such a ban for a long as such sites consider the increased traffic from india to be financially beneficial. For example, any site with ads cares more about the number of clicks than where those clicks come from. They get paid by the number of views or ad clicks they get, so the more traffic the better.
India has 1.5 billion people in it. How do you make the argument to a website whose job is to make money that their situation would be improved by cutting off such a large potential source of revenue?
>>
>>540712001
Tell them India has a GDP per Capita less than Haiti or something.

Their actual wealth or spending power is even lower than that since the rich people own everything.
>>
cumskin coal, india will fuck your mother
>>
>>540711590
damn
imagine that we fought one another more than a hundred years ago on the shores of gallipoli for dumbass reasons, and yet now we've both been cucked by the same horrible world
I'd fight beside anyone against the jeet menace at this point, even a t*rk
>>
>>540712204
To the website this is actually irrelevant. They get paid the same for the ad regardless of whether Elon Musk or a starving orphan in Qatar clicks the link.
>>
File: 34151341233.jpg (131 KB, 983x924)
131 KB JPG
>>540712310
>>
>>540712372
Thats just asking for something to blow up then.

They're basically recording revenue that doesn't exist.
>>
>>540713016
The website gets paid based on the click. That revenue is real. If the people who PAID for the ad to be hosted on the website in return for click do not find the ad to be bringing them any money? Thats their problem, and if the returns are not worth it they will stop paying for the ad. The website will then find another sponsor to pay for an add in the same spot.
The ad may not be worth the cost, but at no point is the revenue fake. Just poorly invested.
>>
>>540711082
This. India has the world's largest overseas diaspora. Banning India won't get rid of Indians.
>>
>>540713118
And let me guess? There are loads of suckers out there who will poorly invest in ads?
>>
never because the jewish goal is to destroy the first world using indians
>>
>>540710896
>Oh no the anti-Indi threads are popping up again, could this by chance have anything at all to do with recent actions in a disputed territory?

Fake and gay faggot geopolitics.
>>
>>540712001
If the quality of the site goes down due to allowing jeets then they will lose visitors, potentially lose even more visitors than they gained by allowing jeets in the first place.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.