[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.jpg (374 KB, 1280x993)
374 KB JPG
I'm hoping for a serious thread to figure out what determines the collective character of the masses in a period of history.

Why are japs perverted autistic weirdos?
Why are jews sadistic perverts?
Why are slavs so slavish?
Why are western europeans so trusting and gullible?
Why are indians, blacks, latinos so unproductive?
Why does the East become more vivacious while the West becomes more suicidal?
What motivates some people to persevere while others are content with dying?
What trait of the collective character determined the spires of the western churches being straight and pointy more appropriate while the eastern churches chose bulbous domes instead?
What influence causes some to praise the sun while others praise the moon?
What caused some collectives to pursue technology while others are content with hunter-gatherer lifestyle?
etc..

Is it just the "need" that pushes a collective in a particular direction? But then what determines the "need" to paint a picture in a certain style or design architecture a certain way? Is it just words that people happen to hear that capture their attention and so phonosemantically influence their thoughts?

This is not meant to be a history thread, although historic events may be referenced to explain the behaviour of the collectives. What I want to figure out are the influences and causes that determine the collective expression of a group of individuals, i.e. influences that determine a collective psychology.

Book recommendations are welcome, but I'd like to hear anons' opinions, however esoteric.
>>
File: 143918.png (467 KB, 1600x1895)
467 KB PNG
>>540763436
>>
>>540763436
The short answer is genetics and epigenetics. The long answer is genetics and epigenetics
>>
>>540763436
>Why are jews sadistic perverts?
/uhg/ are sadistic perverts even compared to /chug/ and they're judeo-nationalists of Ukraine given the history of your Ukrainian leader, it means that you know better what determines this
>>
>>540763436
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9Bme9IUjgQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N27VveLVHjY

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xat490
>>
>>540763436
I don't think you can use 1 factor to explain all the cultural stereotypes you've listed by some of them are explainable:
>Why are japs perverted autistic weirdos?
insane work culture that makes you believe if you don't work 18 hours a day, you're letting your entire lineage down. This needs an outlet, hence the perversions
>Why are jews sadistic perverts?
closed off cult that can't get corrections from outside society
>Why are slavs so slavish?
centuries of despotism, often under hostile foreigners
>Why are indians, blacks, latinos so unproductive?
that's more of a meme than a stereotype - I've had an indian boss that worked 12+ hours every single day, the competition for getting out of the swamp is very serious
>>
>>540763436
genetics and culturally ingrained societal norms
>>
File: muh spurious correlation.jpg (2.38 MB, 9444x1584)
2.38 MB JPG
>>
File: images (23).jpg (27 KB, 458x670)
27 KB JPG
The women
>>
>>540765668
>>540765911
That is the surface of it. Give me the long answer. Where does the "Faustian" spirit attributed to the West come from?

>>540765854
I struggled to find the right word to describe the brown and the cause of their collective manifestation in this world. I still think they are lazy in all aspects of development, otherwise their countries would be much more industrious and culturally influential. Your boss is an exception to the rule. I am referring to the observable apparent collective character, not the traits of some individuals.
Re:slavs, I'm sure other European people have experienced subservience, yet their character is noticeably different.
Re:others, it seems to me like those descriptions are about the "intermediate" behaviour of the people (the result of it is the collective expression, but the behaviour itself is a result of something deeper), I'd like to figure out what, for example, caused japs to be that supposedly obsessed with work, and what caused jews to have their peculiar character (which was there even before Babylon and Rome). Why didn't Latinos in colder Patagonia become as industrious as Europeans, considering that the temperature of Patagonia is generally colder than in most of Europe?
>>
>>540765835
Are you that masonic faggot trying to spread your cult's influence?
The videos you've linked do not elucidate any of the processes they describe. WHY would someone with honor choose to seek scientific knowledge? Why conceal the answers behind the veil of "the wisdom of kabbalah" instead of just giving a answer?
Kabbalah is nothing more than a system of realizing the abstract in this world, it's a management framework. It does not answer why the things work they way they do. The Tree of Life serves only as a plausible (not definite) map for the flow of creativity (potential in abstracto) into manifestation (actual, real thing). It is only a schema of processes that does not justify any of the processes it might be applied to.

That David Icke video has a line which sums up "the wisdom of kabbalah" (0:57): you create a problem, and propose a solution which advances your agenda. This is how European Fabians operate, but their agenda could've been anything. They could've applied the Tree of Life to any other goal, but their inherent spirit choose communist-esque aesthetic to pursue. My question is why?
>>
>>540767410
didn't read, kys fag
>>
File: 14521 (1).jpg (43 KB, 640x469)
43 KB JPG
>>540763436

In general all of the question below can be answered with a vacuum that is filled, similar to evolution. And he is why.

> Why are japs perverted autistic weirdos?
beate sirdon gordon, a jewish woman instrumental for the women rights in 1946 for the constitution of Japan and the me2 movement in Asia wrecked the position of men. While women are still disadvantaged at the workplace, due to pregnancy, they instead opted to exploit marriage. Those who remained became childless workhorses, that not only enjoyed equal rights, but were treated privileged by the men, who court women by treating them better than the standard. Equal thus always means that women are treated better than men. The existing void was filled with men who suddenly had to compete, but not everyone is meant for fighting, so they retreated and built filled the niché they could survive in. Needless to say that these niché without women provide no sexual relief, and frustration that had to go elsewhere. On top of their reserved culture, excluding Penis worship. That's why Japanese are so perverted.

>Why are jews sadistic perverts?
jews are the most studied group of race and it is well documented, that they have a vast amount of physical and mental ailments. Especially the mental disorders, which give them constant anxiety, delusions, pain, self-doubt, jitters, self-hatred, headache, irritation,...
They are basically prone to associate anything that induces these ailments with said pain and relief themselves by enforcing even more control over their environment or inducing even more pain in others. It is genetically coded in them. As for how this played out. When they were put in a position where they could torture, kill and subsequently the escalation of it, eat people with impunity aka protected by USA or any power where they presided, they did just that, kill Palestinians, rape Palestinians, eat Palestinians,...

Cont.
>>
>>540768277
>>540763436

>Why are slavs so slavish
Honestly just bad luck. Slave the term comes from Slav . They were so close to the Ottoman empire and so robust for agriculture that they were a popular good. Can't beat out that behaviour over time, because they were just put down that much. Neither does their environment provide them with much opportunities. So mostly bad luck and making the best out of it.

>Why are western europeans so trusting and gullible?
High trust society turns on the valve, unable to turn it off, cuz sold out politicians serve money and their own blood more than their people.
Now that the damage is irreversible and those who were once foreign took positions in power too, it is impossible to mend and a new status quo emerged.

>Why are indians, blacks, latinos so unproductive?
Culture, environment. Especially in the case of Latinos. There is basically a reason why siesta exists. As for indians, highly toxic and competitive behaviour to pull one over each other paired with a caste system that restricts their every move (*insert izzat).

Cont.
>>
>>540763436
Read Jung.

TLDR high points in regards to your question; whether you're super spiritual or a godless materialist, you can conceive of spirts, of ergore, of "gods". Psychic arteries, that seem to be super duper racially/ethnically animated. Each group has these, some their own some varations of a larger one some that cut across blood in universalit religons that have spread.

The Collective Racial Consciousness, physchic shit both woo woo theospheoy type and grounded Jungian type stuff basically. Plugs into "the materium is the fake bullshit world, projected light made forum, downhill from the realms of spirit.

Get as metaphysical or as atheistic as you want with it, it pays dividends in both mindsets.
>>
>>540768277
>>540768453
>>540763436

>Why does the East become more vivacious while the West becomes more suicidal?
Lack of opportunities. Similar to the East West divide in Germany, the communist side ran to the capitalist side. This is the same in China. While they have beautiful roads and infrastructure, unlike what most communist civilizations had, the inherent system is rotten and the people seek out freedom. This suppression inevitably leads to aggression, so they jump at the first opportunity to vent it (in their own way/East is big).

>What motivates some people to persevere while others are content with dying?
Behaviour can be acquired, but there is always more prey than predators. So unless you are born with this mentality and have no environment to learn you are bound to die.

>What trait of the collective character determined the spires of the western churches being straight and pointy more appropriate while the eastern churches chose bulbous domes instead?
Lack of talent, lack of hostile climate to innovate, lack of resources and or exploitation by neighbouring countries.

>What influence causes some to praise the sun while others praise the moon?
Similar to Arabic flags, including the Turkish one, you can see that they depict the moon differently.
The reason can be attributed to the abundance of heat and the relish of the cold night that made it more bearable.

>What caused some collectives to pursue technology while others are content with hunter-gatherer lifestyle?
Has to do with the climate conditions that make an environment "just hostile enough" to seek innovation, while not crushing them into the ground and inherent genetic predetermined intelligence
>>
>>540768988
>>540768453
>>540768277
I agree with most of these, as with the descriptions of the reactions to the environment. But a reaction differs based on who is doing the reacting. These are descriptions of how an organism reacted, but not descriptions of why the organism reacted that way.
I am sure genetics, climate, and the conditions forced upon the organisms during their life are a considerable part of the resulting collective expression, but they are not inherently the source of those expressions. For example, the bulbous domes are actually harder to build than straight-lined spires, but Eastern groups chose to build them and not straight lines. We could point to the historic architectural influences of the region, but those influences themselves stem from someone's creativity. Why does one language sound smooth and flowing while another sounds like barking? The character of people where a language developed determined what it should sound like. They determined one sound to be better than the other, just like different cultures pursued different styles of music. There was no "war of music" with enslavement and politics and all that, the resulting aesthetic was a result of the pure creative expression of the people, creating something in the emptiness of that specific medium of expression. I am talking more about "characterology", rather than purely historic interactions which demanded a certain reaction from the people.

Spengler, Le Bon, and Jung all pertain to what what I am talking about, but I'd really prefer if anons could post what they've extracted from these or by themselves (like this anon did: >>540768622) instead of just pointing to a book.
>>
>>540768192 (you)
bump at (you)r expense, jewscum, the sage is negated
>>
File: file.jpg (1.12 MB, 2000x1459)
1.12 MB JPG
Last bump



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.