[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1786729823469.png (1.19 MB, 1408x768)
1.19 MB PNG
Main Bulk of Discussion:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_de_Lancie/Archive_1#Roles_mentioned_in_first_paragraph:_Q/Discord

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_de_Lancie/Archive_1#New_Edit_Proposal_for_Discord_Mention_in_the_Lede

Other related discussions:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1143#h-User:FlightTime_showed_bad_editing_etiquette_&_abused_their_admin_powers_to_thre-20231208000900

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/Archive_240#John_de_Lancie

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/Archive_241#John_de_Lancie

TLDR: The user wanted to move the mention of his Discord role to be mentioned as his most well known role along with Star Trek's Q, but the other users did not agree. Do you believe that this edit was justified? Yes or no? I'm looking forward to the discussion. This edit caused quite the discord...

Vote here on who was correct: https://strawpoll.com/xVg71Y0J6yr
>>
You know what is truly criminal. That the Rainbow Cale and the Herring Cale Fish are stub pages of little concern to the general public despite being objectively lovely!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_cale

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herring_cale
>>
File: 1785635448158991.jpg (2.76 MB, 4320x3216)
2.76 MB JPG
https://youtu.be/c-XedD9l8Gk

This compliation includes all 7 of Mr. Enter's privated covid videos from 2020/2021 on top of two recent videos reflecting on his pandemic experience and explaining why privated the videos. He does not retract any of his pandemic/lockdown related opinions, but he does deeply regret a lot of his behavior.

His initial covid19 videos did a great job at making measured and reasonable arguments against the lockdowns and the mandates. Despite how much I liked the videos, I also completely understand why he regrets them, and the two recent videos were interesting and reflective.

Below are brief descriptions of all of the videos in the compilation video. If you only have time to watch one of them, the “How the World Ended” documentary did the best job at thoroughly explaining his anti-lockdown case:

Pandemic: His thoughts on the pandemic in mid-April 2020 and the direction that society chose to take

My Lockdown Story: He talks about how the lockdowns had affected him personally.

How the World Ended: A thorough documentary in July 2020 about how badly the pandemic was mismanaged by governments, health officials, and society.

A Plague of Moral Convenience: He talks about people selling out their values for momentary convenience

The Real Life Internet Shadow: He talks about how his own consistent values have followed him.

My Covid Story: He goes into his experience catching Covid

Hi It’s Me/ Covid19 Segment of "Worst Mr. Enter Videos": He reflected on how the pandemic and society’s reaction had affected him in a deeply negative way, and explained why he took down the previous 7 videos.

Also, here is Technocracy, a great documentary Mr. Enter did on the dangers of Big Tech: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=075Ywg61ipA
>>
>>540780355
Sad. Fuck Wikipedia
>>
What is the consensus on this edit?
>>
>>540783053
? I'd like to hears people's views.
>>
File: concernedpepe.png (12 KB, 622x506)
12 KB PNG
The /mlp/ board is still a thing?
>>
>>540784215
Yep, it's a based show
>>
Hot take dude
>>
>>540784475
we know dummy we were hoping they took care of themselves by now
>>
>>540780139
>"I think you are correct that Wikipedia doesn't allow original research"
Wikiniggers definitely aren't scientists.
>>
>>540780139
Lmao Wikipedia ISNA scam BTW. Only 3% of their proceeds go to hosting costs. They keep all the money they beg for.

I want to cum inside fluttershy.
>>
>>540784215
>>540784887
Watch the first 3 episodes
>>
File: 1751575188656400.png (290 KB, 736x952)
290 KB PNG
trekkies vs bronies lmao are they fighting over which fandom is gayer?
>>
>>540785798
Based mop
>>
>>540785798
I want to fuck that mop
>>
File: 1739597307935079.jpg (38 KB, 1079x722)
38 KB JPG
>>540788363
mop it up jannies!
>>
>>540785798
What is your view on this dispute?
>>
So what is people's thoughts on the disputed edit?
>>
File: 1737503163209.jpg (364 KB, 1536x2048)
364 KB JPG
>>540789055
idk what to make of it and I don't give a fuck
you autistic weirdos that edit kikepedia are a bunch of freaks, even worse than trekkies and bronies combined
the fact that this dispute involves all 3 makes you a triple fag
I was never a fan of star trek so I didn't know about John De Lancie until technicolor horse show so I'm biased but I would argue he's more well known for his performance as Discord



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.