[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: GQ2PcEPWwAE2nYr.jpg (154 KB, 959x959)
154 KB JPG
Seethe, libtards. Solar is physically impossible.

I'm actually a PhD scientist with my degree in thermo dynamics. I used to believe in solar panels until I remember one thing:

They're impossible.

Let me explain, you need energy to manufacture them. That energy comes from fossile fuels. Let's say you use X energy units to manufacture it, the energy you get out of it will always be less than X. You LOSE energy with every solar panel you make.

Basically, you start with the energy of the fuel, you lose some of it, so you might as well be burning the oil.

Unless someone can tell me where all the excess energy the solar panel 'makes' is coming from? Hint: you cant.

I will donate $1,000 to any charity of your choice if you can answer this simple question.
>>
>>540906862
>Solar is physically impossible.
Yet my a/c 24/7 is powered by the impossible, the future is bright Lambright 2028.
>>
>>540907002
That's only because you're still running on the energy that was put into it. Unless there's some magic source of energy, you are getting less than if you burned the tank of gas is my point.
>>
>>540906862
Nuclear, coal and petroleum are the future and in that order. Coal is an amazing material. The people who seek to destroy America and suffocate its dynamism hate coal because we have so much of it and it's so useful. It's very easy to filter its exhaust smoke. There's nothing at all wrong with CO2. It's oxygen for plants.
>>
>>540906862
AI made pepes look like shit
>>
>>540907137
>Unless there's some magic source of energy
that's the sun
>>
>>540907625
dude is genuinely retarded, lol.
>>
>>540906862
>where all the excess energy the solar panel 'makes' is coming from?
the sun
it transforms the sun's energy into electricty
energy cannot be made or destroyed, only transformed
that's exactly what the panel does
a "PhD scientist" with a degree in "thermo (sic) dynamics" would know that
>>
>>540906862
Leftists are only pro-energy until that becomes feasible they they hate it. They used to shill for nuclear power and hydro dams now you can't build either. If windmills and solar actually worked they'd be against them too
>>
File: JapaneseMan.png (297 KB, 887x680)
297 KB PNG
>>540906862
Energy units have different prices in different markets.
Chinese energy units are currently cheaper than US energy units. That'd because Chinese are less valuable than Americans and other Westerners. Their value is lower, so their energy costs less.
As long as solar panels are produced by cheap (low value) Chinese people, and then used by higher value people (Westerners, whites) then the cost of production is offset by their usage in higher energy value countries.

>but energy should cost the same everywhere
Yes it should. Bitcoin fixes this. As it's value moves from speculation to align more closely with the raw energy costs to mine and validate the blockchain, the value of Chinese increases
>>
>>540906862
>be me
>be man
>eat food grown by the sun
>assemble solar cell from chemical+electrical process
>don't bother with fancy coatings, mountings, or anything
>takes a week to make 6sq ft
>even my pathetic low efficiency oxide shit tier solar panel gets 5-10% of solar energy for like a few months.
>That's 10-25 watts a meter squared on most of earth.
>assume 4 hours of sunlight a day
>600-1500 watt hours over two months

Hmmm, so if I can make a square meter of solar power that doesn't corrode away for less than 600 watt hours it wouldn't be a scam, but you are saying it's impossible?

Perhaps this is more efficient than just burning wood on my steam turbine?
>t. Does not own an oil well.
>>
>>540906862
The energy payback time for solar panels is 1 to 2 years of operation (where the energy they've generated equals the energy used to manufacture them, from raw material extraction to installation), and they live for 30 years, so 95% of their life cycle is extra energy.

Your point is just wrong.
>>
>>540907719
After consulting with my colleges you do raise some interesting points that were not in Michael Moore's movie. Though I will have to read the literature first.

Name your charity.
>>
>>540906862
generally when someone talks about solar power plants they aren't talking about photovoltaics lol
>>
>>540906862
>tell me where all the excess energy the solar panel 'makes' is coming from?

It's called "the sun".
>>
>>540908556
>After consulting with my colleges

you know damn well there's no colleges, you made the whole thing up asshole
>>
>>540906862
than you must be the most retarded physician after einstein
>>
>>540906862
it's like saying you lose energy to mine radioactive elements and pouring conrete to build a nuclear energy plant
>>
>>540906862
Oil is the same
>Use energy from oil to make an oil rig
>Extract oil
>Back where you started
>>
>>540907137
>still running on the energy that was put into it.
so you're alleging there's small engines in the solar panels, and that the engines turn off when the sunlight gets too weak to maintain the illusion?
>>
>>540906862
>degree in thermo dynamics.
no such degree exists, also thermodynamics is one word. oil is not fossil fuel. oil is found way underneath the fossil record. Only those who push concepts like peak oil would say "fossil fuel."

oil isnt about energy as much as it is about currency backing, so you are wrong across the board with your naive argument. keep your thousand dollars, dumbass
>>
>>540907137
>That's only because you're still running on the energy that was put into it. Unless there's some magic source of energy, you are getting less than if you burned the tank of gas is my point.

I get it.

In life, we mine or grow it.

It has to come from someplace. who fucken cares?
>>
>>540908991
I got my degree from the Creation Institute. My job is using Thermodynamics to disprove evolution.
>>
File: Nego Scientific American.jpg (977 KB, 2048x1365)
977 KB JPG
>>540906862
>Be superior lefty consumer
>Muh environment
>I buy a new car every 10 years or less to save the planet
>That's how science works
Car could run 50 years. Crush it. Buy new electric (so good) car. Crush that in 10 years. Buy another. I pay so little in fuel each year! That means it's working.

I fucking love science.
>>
>>540906862
>They're impossible.
It's possible to use solar to create more solar if you just store the solar energy into a battery until it has enough power to make more solar panels
>>
>>540906862
based smart nigga
>>
>>540906862
this image reminded me that i gotta refill the blinker fluid in my car.
>>
File: eroiranking.jpg (177 KB, 1140x899)
177 KB JPG
>>540906862
>Let me explain, you need energy to manufacture them.
> That energy comes from fossile fuels.
Incorrect.
Let's expand the game.
Fossil fuels is an unproven meme , created by Rockefellers . Nobody can prove it.
In reality , Oil is a HydroCarbon , a combination of molecules H (Hydrogen) and C (Carbon)/
You can use many different energy sources to generate energy to create solar panels - from burning coal,
to hydro , to wind, to nuclear.

>. You LOSE energy with every solar panel you make.
So, you don't , because energy is literally everywhere and in everything .
Even Planet itself makes HydroCarbons as we speak right now, in MASSIVE quantities.

>Unless someone can tell me where all the excess energy the solar panel 'makes' is coming from?
Answered above.
You can donate $1000 to me, I need it more than charity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrocarbon
>>
>>540907137
>Unless there's some magic source of energy, you are getting less than if you burned the tank of gas is my point.
That's fake jewish "physics".
Only works magically for "Closed systems only".
As soon as the system is OPEN , you have no limitations.
>>
>>540906862
that's bullshit
the energy used to make a solar panel is part of the cost that's forwarded to the end consumer.
a 600W solar panel costs me around $100 dollars and easily pays for itself after 3 months
>>
>>540911610
>is part of the cost
That's not the issue. If that was the only issue, FED bank and Euro central bank would have generated billions of digits in a computer,
and then magically everybody would have energy .
That's not how it works, you need to get actual energy somewhere.
>>
>>540911701
whoever made the solar panel in China had to buy the energy from somewhere
>>
>>540911762
Correct. they have a huge number of nuclear power plants, hydro plants etc.
So , an outside energy source (river, uranium) was used to generate electricity ,
that was later used by a factory to make panels.
>>
>>540911701
there's also this from google but I think it's overestimating quite a bit

Producing a standard 400-watt silicon solar panel requires roughly 1,200 to 1,700 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of primary energy input, driven heavily by silicon purification and ingot manufacturing. This manufacturing investment is paid back by the panel's clean electricity generation within 1 to 4 years of operation
>>
>>540906862
Solar is only good for memes like homestead and prepping, that's about it.
>>
>>540911976
Exactly .
Also if you have an unlimited source, like a river and a river dam. Your energy is abundant and easily available.
We are currently working on a full circle in nuclear power plants, right now you got some radioactive waste.
Theoretically pretty soon we are going to have a tech where uranium is going full circle, then you can also call this a nearly unlimited source .
>>
File: IMG_0195.jpg (24 KB, 410x422)
24 KB JPG
>>540906862
>Basically, you start with the energy of the fuel, you lose some of it, so you might as well be burning the oil.

>Unless someone can tell me where all the excess energy the solar panel 'makes' is coming from? Hint: you cant.

… the sun?
>>
>>540912244
>… the sun?
Yeah, he lost the plot there, it's not a closed system , it's an OPEN system.
>>
>>540907137
>Unless there's some magic source of energy,
From the sun that us free. Flattie.
>>
>>540906862
I'm in favour of a flexible energy policy like what the Chinks currently have. They've incorporated oil and gas but also coal, wind, and solar plus other NGLs. They have the scale to mass produce solar and they're giving some to Cuba outa the goodness of their heart. It made China the honey badger of energy importers. Hormuz hasn't bothered them at all, they were able to scale back and switch to other sources than oil and gas without much dipping into their reserves.
>>
File: IMG_0197.jpg (56 KB, 750x684)
56 KB JPG
>>540912452
China is increasing its energy independence and decreasing its reliance on oil while the west continues to cuck itself
>>
>>540912194
I can't use the power of the river in China directly though. This is a good alternative and definitely much better than oil or grid electricity for homes.
>>
>>540912904
You can. You need a river , big river or a significant drop for hydro power.
and you can stick panels on a roof practically anywhere. Applicable in different locations.
All good hydro power spots are taken ,
they are currently experimenting at pumping water uphill when they have excess power et.c
>>
File: mini-hydro-turbine.jpg (277 KB, 1280x720)
277 KB JPG
>>540913362
>>540912904
>All good hydro power spots are taken ,
There are small startups who are currently experimenting with tiny hydro turbines of various kinds for power generation.
You can even 3d print a turbine .
If you can pump water on a 2nd floor, and drop it down 1-2 floors, you can even experiment with tiny hydro turbines yourself.
There will probably be a progress here shortly.
If that's the case, they you could use small rivers that never have been targets for hydro in the past as power sources.
>>
>small hydro turbines

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=small+hydro+turbines&t=brave&ia=images&iax=images
>>
>>540906862
you are looking at this the wrong way. You use X amount of fuel in China. You gain x-y amount of clean energy in the USA

alternative energy is all about shifting the dirty cost to third world shitholes for our benefit.
>>
gas is $6 lol
>>
>>540913717
We should be taking maximum advantage of how cutthroat the business is in China and even offer them a BEST BID offer lol

We could cover New Mexico in solar panels for like 20 billion and power all of the country with that shit.
>>
>>540913661
This. Fuck fish. Stupid retard fish.
>>
>>540910585
>I got my degree from the Creation Institute. My job is using Thermodynamics to disprove evolution.
yeah I could tell

you can tell an Arday from a real professor by the way they write.
>>
>>540906862
The sun
>>
>>540908500
>1100 to 1900 kWh per panel
>Have 7.6 kWp panels, make about 1000-2000 kWh a year
>Never actually bothered counting them but it's a 7x2 array or so
>14 year payback time
Not good, not bad.
>>
File: kekAroo.jpg (309 KB, 1333x1180)
309 KB JPG
>>540907002
Wow Wayne I remember telling you to upgrade your solar array like 2 or 3 years ago. I'm glad you kept working at it and are doing better. Just so you know my solar is doing well too. I don't run AC with mine for many reasons but I have enough to play as much PS4 as I want. I'm working through RDR2 for the first time, late I know but that's my style. Anyway I'm on 100% solar power at my off grid homestead and I just crossed over ONE MEGAWATT of power made with my small array. I currently only have about 1000 watts of panels out but I'm always working on making it more efficient.

For the record OP is a lying faggot, and likely has AIDS from being penetrated by niggers, many such cases.

>Payback Period: Under average sunlight conditions, a solar panel generates enough clean electricity to "pay back" the energy used during its production in about 1 to 2 years.

>Over a 30-year lifespan, a single 100-watt solar panel will generate 4,590 kWh of clean electricity, completely wiping out its initial manufacturing footprint within the first 2 years of operation.This creates a highly positive Energy Return on Investment (EROI), meaning the panel ultimately produces roughly 18 times more energy than it took to build.
>>
>>540906862
By that metric the energy gained from burning fuel should always be less than the energy used to extract and process the fuel. The sun provides the energy you retard, the energy used to create the PV Cell could come from anywhere and the cell can provide excess energy relative to the energy used to create it. ICE engines work despite requiring energy to create.

The real answer is nuclear, you're being retarded on purpose same as green energy fags.
>>
>>540907536
>>
>>540910585
>My job is using Thermodynamics to disprove evolution.
Creation is self-evident, to anyone who actually studied this even from a distance.

Radio Halos can't be explained any other way, except instant creation followed by a micro second later of polonium decay leaving the electron shell trapped inside of solid rock. You can count the electron shells and determine the original element which is now gone.

The Bible is true. Praise GOD.
>>
>>540906862
>You LOSE energy with every solar panel you make.
Initially, yes. However, overtime the panels produced far more energy than what was used to make them.
>I have a Ph.D
In being a retard?
The real issue with solar panels is the same as with wind. They do break eventually, and can't really be recycled.
>>
>>540913743
Gas is $6

A single solar panel is $100,000

The choice is easy.
>>
>>540906862
400W panel:
> lasts 25-30 years
> will produce about 20,400 kWh of energy during its life

so you're telling me to manufacture a single 400W panel you would need more than 20,400 kWh?

American education everyone
>>
>>540907137
But you can only burn the tank of gas once
>>
>>540910585
Excellent. Do they award degrees in Algebra or, perhaps, Handwriting, as well?

Thermodynamics is not, in itself, a discipline. It is a single topic. A subject. One applies thermodynamics to begin testing hypothses.
>>
Napkin math says you're wrong. Energy payback is a year ish. Otherwise post your numbers.

Manufacturing step
Approx. energy
Purifying silicon
200–350 kWh
Ingot + wafer production
100–180 kWh
Solar cell processing
60–120 kWh
Glass + aluminum frame
80–150 kWh
Module assembly/other
30–70 kWh
Total
~500–900 kWh
>>
File: IMG_4846.jpg (44 KB, 507x442)
44 KB JPG
>>540907536
>>
>>540906862
Have you Gone Full Retard??? Solar panels from 2012 are still offsetting 1,000s of kWh per home.. 120% offset installed is still producing 111% of electricity needed currently… a $500 electric bill (which was $150 in 2012) is still being Zeroed out you fuckin knob smoker.
>>
>>540917534
Even if your solar panel lasts 20 years that's still only using it once. And then there's the problem fo throwing it away. Absolute biohazard.
>>
>>540917810
> throwing away biohazard
Thats what 3rd world countries are for
>>
>>540907536
Some of the very first ones are kinda based.
>>
File: pepe3.png (281 KB, 454x485)
281 KB PNG
>>540917881
>>
>>540906862
EROEI. The peak oil fags would discuss this non stop in the early 2000s. I still think the worst is ethanol.
>>
>>540907137
The magic source is the sun you collosal. retard.
>>
>>540916508
Creation being true does not imply it is the work of the Semitic donkey god Yahweh or his Jewish vampire son. That is fantastically retarded.
>>
solar panels are so expensive because theyre fake. the manufacturer doesnt know how they work, its all obfuscation "silicon" and other nonsense. you could make them yourself if you knew the truth.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.