[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


4chan will be down for scheduled maintenance starting at 12 p.m. Eastern Time.


[Advertise on 4chan]


There’s a limit to your humanity.
>>
Guess what state Mondale was from?
>>
>>540932075
why do you post this everyday? bot?
>>
>>540932150
Reagan came close to winning Minnesota too.
>Reagan: 1,032,603 / 49.54%
>Mondale: 1,036,364 / 49.72%
>>
>>540932250
Why always 1984 and never 1972? That was a 49-state landslide too.
>>
Any oldheads remember the 2016 election night, I really thought everything would change.
>>
>>540932075
>conservative hero wins in a landslide
>amnesties millions of illegals

yey democracy
>>
File: Election 88.jpg (99 KB, 1280x720)
99 KB JPG
>>540932567
Probably because it's more recent. 1984 was the last time many of those states voted for a Republican president.
Pic related is from 1988 when Al Franken predicted Mike Dukakis would beat George Bush by winning the electoral college but losing the popular vote. He thought that would be a good outcome because it would better represent the will of a people across the country instead of that of certain population centers.
>>
>>540932687
https://limbona.com/scenarios?category=president

test it.
>>
>>540932075
The trajectory of almost all graphs relating to economy, the average worker, banking, the federal reserve, gold, foreign policy, and wages/income have gigantic variations right around this time, usually starting in 1985; which now mimic or are exponentially larger now than they ever have been since.

>what?
I mean, just think of a graph that represents data from time period of 1980-1990. Right around this election, there are statistical anomalies across almost all of them where you will see huge ups or downs or downright anomalous data even though it is accurate. If you take that data and overlay it onto a graph of data representing 2016 until now, it’s either identical or exponentially larger variations except this time it is sustaining. The jumps in the graph lines have never been larger and continue to climb. Usually it relates to economy, wages/income, foreign policy, banking, etc. things that effect how much a dollar costs both domestically and overseas. Maybe I’m schizophrenic, but you can see for yourselves. Pull up any copypasta graphs you have saved right now and you’ll see it.
>>
File: MAGA POS.png (419 KB, 590x450)
419 KB PNG
>>540932075
all trumplets hits 6/6 in this test
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5-S-3GQ3Og
>>
>>540932075
And thats why George Orwell called his novel 1984 you fucking conservashits
>>
>>540932075
He only won because of that Assassination attempt.
>>
>>540937767
And because Mondale had to bad mouth an astronaut hero.
>>
>>540932656
This. I was literally about to post this. He was given a mandate with this election landslide and still legalized millions without closing the boarder. Reagan was the original worthless neocon
>>
>>540937792
And because he picked a woman as his VP. Even most women didn't like the idea of a woman being a heartbeat away from the presidency.
>>
>>540937943
Boomers will tell you that Democrats double crossed him, promising to secure the border if he agreed to this one time amnesty. Problem is, he should have known better than to trust Democrats to uphold their half of the deal without a legally binding construct.
>>
>>540937945
Ironic too considering anyone who knew Reagan knew his wife was calling the shots. Reagan may of been president but Nancy was the one who wore the pants in that marriage.
>>
>>540938026
The idiot parade



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.