Whites have always seen blacks as animals. All whites see all blacks as animals.Every attitude whites have had towards blacks is the transposition of the behavior of a human towards an animal.At first europeans discovered the blacks, and considered them cryptid, or wild animals, a curiosity that could be ignored.Then, Europeans began to feel bad for the blacks, and wanted to civlise them. Civilising lesser races was genuinely the goal of european colonialism, as can be seen by the fact that europe did not attempt to colonise thailand after they civilised themselves.In this phase, the whites saw the blacks as poor helpless animals in need of rescue, like an injured dog taken to a shelter.Then, after civilising failed and whites became frustrated with the poor results of the blacks, they began seing blacks as animals that could be exploited for their benefit. Slaves. The same as cattle.Then, other europeans began to feel bad for the blacks, creating the woke and civil right ideologies among whites.Meanwhile, other whites saw blacks as dangerous and violent criminals, a danger.But both sides still see blacks as animals. The white left sees them as endangered animals, like pandas, in need of preservation and protection. While the white right sees blacks like pest, something like coyotes, foxes and honey badgers, a nasty animal that attacks your chicken in the middle of the night and gives you rabbies, and needs to be hunted down and exterminated.Some whites even adopt black children: a pet relationship.No matter what ideology you look at, every single faction of white throughout history has seen the blacks as some brand of animal, be it an animal to be ignored, to be rescued, to be farmed, to be protected, or to be hunted down as pest. All whites see all blacks as beasts, and this human-beast dynamic is what has defined all politics and all social movements regarding the black race.
I'm white and I see blacks as fellow human beings.
cultural Marxism in the west descends originally from the Anglo concept of the "the White mans burden">White mans burdenwe need to expend our time, energy and resources to raise up the lesser races because we are so much better>Modern anti-White ideologyWe need to expend our time, energy and resources to raise up the oppressed races because we are the cause of their problemsthese two ways of thinking lead to the exact same thing
Yes and I don't think this is even debatable.This isn't even hidden in any way.Tolerant people openly treat them like retarded children and take pride in the racism of low expectations, or do their best to give them free shit to try and keep the violent animal docile through constant stream of gifts.
But its actually us whites that are the animal. The Eurasian race is a neanderthal, the sub saharans are "pure humans". Long ago neanderthal mated with black women and created modern europeans. We are materal sub saharans.
>>540967260kike
>>540967308Jews are even more neanderthal than regular europeans
White Mans Burden my boy, White Mans Burden...
>>540966202lol, lmao even
>>540967375You mean Tikkun olam?
>>540966202Imagine putting this on a shirt
>>540966159pretty much.
>>540966159Accurate to some point but people ignore the factor of terrain. Colonization would have lasted if it were economically viable. The lack of civilization is in instances simply not viable without very significantly different technologies. Social and industrial advances will be kicking people in every culture around for likely the next 10 generations so I wouldn't gather anything anymore about attitudes of superiority.
>>540970350I don't have time for shit though guys.
