So I finally watched this and while it isnt as big a slam dunk Candace Owen's fans have made it out to be Wilson definetly got smoked here, mostly by his own doing.Also>gib Candace Owen's waifu
>>541005134I still dgaf about Charlie Kirk , fuck you and death to America
>>541005134You're indian
>>541005342Shalom Rabbi
>>541005134>can you please show me actual evidence that Erika Kirk was complicit in her husband's murder as you claimed in this clip here?Uhh uhh uhh that's out of context! I never said she was complicit, said I FELT she was complicit, and my evidence? I was told by an anonymous source from a foreign government that I won't tell you about, believe me bruh, okay?>so you don't think she was complicit in Charlie being murdered?I-I-I-I-I'm not going to answer the way you want me to answer, you're not my daddy, okay? I didn't say she was complicit but I FEEL she was complicit and I have evidence of that but I won't show you the evidence but trust me.
This nigger is bitch is still crying about Charlie? Kek. Andrew Wilson is a cuck though, the lowest thing a man could ever be, so Candace wins anyway.
>>541005253>>541005342oy gevalt
>>541005134this haircut is doing things to me
>>541005134ALARM !!!!!!!!!!!!
>>541005134our chocolate queenwe need her and ana to link up. chocolate and vanilla antisemitism combo
>>541006036You didnt watch it or you are just deliberately lying.Either way you are a kike.
>>541006036>from a foreign governmentcare to tell us which foreign government is this antisemitic?
>>541005134OMG No one fucking carespost some more PR sensationalism, Faggot
>>541006323Watched the whole thing. She refused to provide substantiation for her claims. Squirmed and obfuscated. Even if one thinks Andrew Wilson had shitty evidence in favor of his position, she provided zero evidence. It was all vibes, feels, trust me bro my source I won't tell you about told me so. If that's not true you should be able to provide me with her evidence presented during this debate that Erika Kirk was complicit in Charlie's murder. You watched it very closely, tell me what she provided as substantiating for her position.
>541006323
>>541006741The fact she didnt assert Erika Kirk was complicit in his death and then immediately explained the context of that out of context clip.Nice try Rabbi.
>>541005253but anonthis caae exposes the jewish influence in america ultimately leading to the death of both
>>541006741>She refused to provide substantiation for her claims. Squirmed and obfuscated.so the same thing the fed narrative covering for mossad has done
>>541005134Who are any of these people and why have you made at thread about these literal nobodies? Social media was a mistake
>>541006036>show me actual evidenceGiven that it's a conspiracy, why would anyone have access to this and not have been assassinated or be using it as part of an official investigation? False hurdle in my book. Like asking for a court verdict showing that Bush/Cheney did 9/11.
>>541006885The context being what exactly? She just said "that's out of context" but didn't actually provide what the actual context of stating Erika Kirk was complicit in Charlie Kirk's death actually was. She just said it was out of context and changed the topic and tried to attack Andrew Wilson for calling Erika Kirk retarded (which is accurate). Also, you know there's not one clip of her saying Erika Kirk is complicit, but rather like 2,000 because that nigger has been on this grift for months now and hasn't backed away from that claim the entire time.
>>541005342JIDF please leave
>>541007085>so the same thing the fed narrative covering for mossad has doneSeems that the state of Utah has a case, which is based on evidence. Whether or not it's good evidence and Tyler Robinson will be convicted has yet to be seen. Do you have evidence you'd like to present that there is a fed cover-up and that mossad killed Charlie Kirk?
This thread is full of ugly kikes
>>541006138ALL YOUR BLACK FOREST BELONG TO CANDACE
/pol/ is such a joke now manI swear this board is literally all shit skins now
>>541007253Not all conspiracies are baseless, or based on baseless claims. You would agree with that, right? So like if I said I don't think that Lee Harvey Oswald was alone and that the CIA probably killed JFK, there is actual evidence such as acoustic evidence of a 4th shot, the proven connections of Oswald to the intel world, the subsequent flimsy basis for Jack Ruby murdering Oswald, etc.If her claim was purely that she doesn't think that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie or if he did that he didn't act alone that's fine, and if all she did was speculate that it could have involved XYZ that's not definitive claims. Candace Owens has made definitive claims that she has proof and evidence of things such as a conspiracy in which Erika Kirk was complicit, among other things. When asked for evidence of such a direct and affirmative claim she backtracks and pretends like she's just asking questions. But that's not actually what she's doing. In fact, if there is indeed an actual conspiracy with evidence here she has served to muddy the waters quite successfully.
>>541007326yesKirk died immediately after denouncing Israel
>>541007657I know I don't have to ask this but: Do you think that someone denouncing something and then being shot by someone else is sufficient evidence to put on trial and convict a person or group? I.E. to you, that alone is evidence beyond a reasonable doubt? Like, if Donald Trump said today that he denounces the Coca-Cola company and that he's come to hate their products and then tomorrow a deranged tranny-fucking leftist shoots him dead, you of course would first and foremost suspect the Coca-Cola company did it, correct?
>>541007599>/pol/ is such a joke now man>I swear this board is literally all shit skins nowIt's a combination of things... shills gassing each other up, brownoids and the general retardation of zoomers who take "influencers" seriously.
>>541007994The fraudulent nation that wanted one of the primary obstacles out of the way to their unholy war with iran was responsible yesespecially a major influence on corruptible youths that was turning against themthe faux nation with this exact pattern of behaviorall video evidence disproves any of the agents recorded behaved like or looked like tyler, who was an errand boy at best in an obvious group covert op
>>541008200Yeah, I know that you feel that Israel would have had motive to kill Charlie Kirk, but would you also agree that an alternative explanation that a deranged leftist who is fucking a tranny and has been led to believe through the constant narratives and lies about him that such a milquetoast center-right guy was in fact the next incarnation of Adolf Hitler would at least have motive as well?The other thing you said was your reason for why you don't think that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk, which is fair. I'm sure the defense team will cast doubt on the actions of people on the scene or the video evidence, but you would also agree that even IF your observation there was that you don't believe Tyler Robinson was the shooter, that does not automatically indicate that the responsible party in a conspiracy is necessarily the Israeli government, and that you would need a greater degree of evidence than your opinion on simple motive to state unequivocally that they DID kill him (not that you believe they might have)? Like there's a distinction there in what you would claim to be unequivocally true and provable (with evidence) versus what you strongly suspect is the case?
>>541007326>the state has a case based on evidenceNo, no they dont. The state has prints from the guy on the roof. They dont match Tyler Robinson. Ipso facto Tyler is NOT the guy on the roof. Tyler therefore is a patsy. Why else would multiple cops testify that Tyler was the guy up on the roof?Hilariously, the feds narrative points entirely towards their star witness who has no alibi.>primary contributor of DNA to the towel and rifle and screwdriver?>Lance>least degraded DNA?>Lance>least degraded prints?>Lance>but since we gave Lance immunity, >Tyler did it!Seriously, any non compromised judge would have thrown this case out because it clearly fails the probable cause standard.
>>541008718>the tranny had motive to murder KirkLance the prosecutions star witness is the tranny. Tyler is a tranny fucker. Gay perhaps, but not a tranny. And thank you for showing the prosecutions star witness had motive (as well and means and opportunity).>someone other than Israel could have done itShow me ONE single murder where a JEWISH guy stands up and yells “I shot him” that is NOT linked to Israel or the jewish mob. Fact is jews never stand up to protect goys no matter what, so that old jewish guy actively distracting the cops is proof that Israel/the jewish mob were involved in this hit.And again they have the prints from the guy in the roof and they do not match Tyler. So WHO was the roof guy who supposedly shot Kirk?
>>541008718>that a deranged leftist who is fucking a tranny and has been led to believe through the constant narratives and lies about him that such a milquetoast center-right guy was in fact the next incarnation of Adolf Hitler would at least have motive as well?No.
>>541008963>prints from the guy on the roof don't match Tyler RobinsonThe investigators collected fingerprints from the escape area, most of which were not suitable for comparison but the ones which were didn't match Tyler Robinson. Those were surfaces in a publicly accessible area where multiple other people could have gone, and the fact that the prints they collected were not his are not evidence that A. Tyler Robinson was not on the roof, or B. Another person was the shooter.>primary contributor of DNA to the towel, rifle, and screwdriver was Lance TwiggsThe FBI testimony from the pre-trial hearing was that on the towel it was 95% Robinson's DNA, the screwdriver was 89% Robinson's DNA, and there was not to my knowledge a percentage of DNA given for the rifle, but that it contained DNA from something like 4 people and Tyler Robinson's was in the most locations, especially those which you'd touch a weapon while firing it, and that it was 1 trillion times more likely that Tyler Robinson had handled and fired the gun than any of the other sources of DNA on it.>degraded DNAThe DNA expert confirmed that DNA degradation is not specifically time-reliant i.e. a person could more recently handle an object than someone else, but the person who more recently handled it could have more degraded DNA on the object. The potential factors listed were U/V light exposure, heat, humidity, moisture, cleaning materials on surfaces, friction, individual differences in the person in question.With all that said, I'm not even saying I believe the state's case, or that Tyler Robinson did it. A deranged tranny could absolutely be the shooter, rather than the tranny fucker, but the evidentiary standard for most people is incredibly low because people want to believe whatever narrative suits them.
>>541009391I didn't say the tranny had motive to kill Charlie Kirk, I said the tranny-fucker, i.e. the person who is fucking a tranny, i.e. Tyler Robinson. But I'm not saying that Lance Twiggs is not complicit either. The entire point that I'm making which was the point of that debate is not that I or someone else has all of the answers, and that other people shouldn't pursue the possibility of a conspiracy and compile evidence. It's that the people participating in the conspiracy theorizing are not doing it from the position of a skeptic (of their own claims), they are rather beginning with a conclusion and working backwards to support their conclusions. They will question the stability of the claims from the state's claim but grant themselves far more leeway with their own claims. In fact, they shouldn't be making claims specifically without evidence, since speculation is not a claim.If I said "I think that Israel probably had motive to see Charlie Kirk killed" and listed the reasons why, I doubt that ANYONE on either side of this argument would take issue with doing that. Maybe some people would rebut the statement and say they disagree, but that's about it. If I said "ISRAEL KILLED CHARLIE KIRK, UNEQUIVOCALLY AND I HAVE EVIDENCE OF THIS" and people said "okay, please present your evidence" and my evidence was "sources tell me XYZ, but I won't give them over to be verified" or "I really feel like it makes sense" those things are NOT evidence and should NOT be taken seriously as fact.
>>541005134No one respects him because he shits on OF girls the low hanging fruit Candace has a bigger following because she shits on kikes as anyone with above room temp IQ should
>>541009733>the prints not matching doesnt prove it wasnt TylerYes, yes it does. He is on video touching the railing with his bare hands. None of the prints match. Ipao facto Tyler is NOT the guy on the roof. Its literally that simple retard.>the DNA contributor percentsThis was testified to twice, and youve got it backwards Lance was the major contributor on all of that. With less degraded DNA as well. Thats why they argued Tyler took Lance’s stuff to perform the assassination.>degraded DNA doesnt matterPoppycock. The longer DNA has been on something, the more it is exposed to, the more it degrades. It is thoroughly impossible for Tylers DNA to be degraded to hell and Lance’s untouched unless LANCE was the last to touch the rifle. There is precisely NO scenario where Tylers DNA would be massively degraded but Lance’s ON THE SAME SURFACE wouldnt be degraded.This is truly bad science given that the DNA was found in the SAME swab. >a deranged tranny could be the shooterThat is LANCE you mong! Tyler is a tranny fucker but not himself a tranny. Lance IS a deranged tranny and his word is the prosecutions entire case. And he cannot even tell the truth about his gender.
>paying any attention to a retarded negress and her schizo rantsngmi
>>541010023Dodging the simple question huh? Name ONE other time a jewish man has stood up and said “I shot him” or similar when it wasnt a hit by Israel or the jewish mob. Name ONE.And your bad faith arguments fall on deaf ears shill. Appeal to ignorance (no one knows!!!!) Appeal to authority (FBI expert said so!) Straw-man(seriously face the facts and address the actual argument before you by answering the single damn question), ad hominems (anyone asserting Israel did it is a conspiracy theory) and more. Can you name a single incident where a jewish man claimed “i did it” that doesnt involve Israel or the jewish mob?
>>541005134>Candace Owen's fansYou mean, bots?
>>541010305>>541010542Funny how Wilson lost so badly to that retarded nigress. Is there a word for more retarded than a literal retard?
>>541010203>prints on railings/stairwellYou're mistaken, the prints which were discussed during the preliminary hearing were not prints taken from the stairwell or railing up to the roof, it was specifically from the rooftop edge where the shooter made his escape. It isn't publicly known yet if there are prints from the stairwell or elsewhere on the building itself which matched back to Tyler Robinson, and we won't know if there is evidence linking him to the physical location or not until trial. Stating that there are no prints which match up to him on the building isn't a factual statement you can make yet, because it's unknown if that's actually true.>DNA percentagesNo, I'm quite certain you have it backwards. Here's an article from a news source in Utah that covered the hearing:https://www.deseret.com/politics/2026/07/10/tyler-robinson-preliminary-hearing-charlie-kirk-assassination-utah-court/>On the towel, 5% belonged to Twiggs, and 95% belonged to Robinson. On the screwdriver, 11% was Twiggs’ and 89% was Robinson’s.But don't take their word for it, here's the actual hearing posted at the correct time:https://youtu.be/8ct3UxiyPQ0?t=961>degraded DNAI didn't say degraded DNA doesn't matter. I said that it isn't in itself proof that the most recent person to handle the weapon was or wasn't Tyler Robinson, and that fact was testified to as well. Also, the DNA was NOT all in the same areas, and the only person whose DNA was found on all of the surfaces you would touch in order to have fired the rifle was Tyler Robinson which was also testified to.>a deranged tranny could be the shooterYou're not even able to comprehend what I've written, this is twice that you think I'm mixing up Lance Twiggs and Tyler Robinson. I'm also not even taking the stance that Tyler Robinson MUST be the shooter, just pointing out that your evidentiary claims are wrong or incomplete and that you're the only one here who is jumping to conclusions.
>>541010665Kek I'll i have to do to get a (You) is to say Owens has bots. Point proven
>>541010504I didn't dodge any question you posed, your entire premise for your post was mistaken.>Name ONE other time a jewish man has stood up and said “I shot him” or similar when it wasnt a hit by Israel or the jewish mob. Name ONE.Provide evidence of a time where someone was assassinated and immediately there was a jewish man claiming to have murdered him in the audience. The man in question is a known political agitator, and it sure is strange that he behaved that way, but the explanation you've offered is not the only possible or plausible explanation. It's also possible that a deranged leftist who was there because he thought Charlie Kirk was literally Hitler realized that one of his fellow "resistance" members had just assassinated the guy, and took the opportunity to try and confuse as many police as possible while the assassin made his getaway.>appeal to ignoranceSo a lack of evidence of a thing and stating that we shouldn't fill in the gaps with unsubstantiated speculation is an "appeal to ignorance" now?>appeal to authorityAn expert testifying to DNA evidence? The same expert testimony that you got wrong, but wanted to use to substantiate you claim? So we can trust authority if that authority supports whatever you want to believe, but if they say anything to the contrary (not even something that I necessarily believe) then it's a conspiracy. I see.>strawmanI didn't strawman what your position was once, and I don't think you actually know what the term means.>AdhominemWhere did I attack you personally in any of this?
>>541006036You lick snizz
