Would the US win in a global conflict?
>>54101413980 years from now , niggas will call that the greatest generation
>>541014345lol>>541014139the answer is no. They need to get their asses kicked so they go through the same purge of government positions soviets did in 80s and 90s against a particular parasite thats been pulling strings since the russian civil war. You have a non-homogenous army and unmotivated worse than Yugoslavia, no manufacturing or commodity production or refining. The population of competent men; whites, non-indian asians and 2nd gen spanish admixture mutts, that could right the ship now hate the country or have no allegiance to it. You need to redefine America, forge it into something worth fighting for and purge retards, women and (((them))) from anything in positions of power or cultural significance. The pocket book is fucked too by the way, our books look like we just lost a world war instead of dictating terms in our favor after winning. The economy would need to be completely reconfigured to fix this and boomers would have to be forced to lose. This is a decades long process. Start the war tomorrow and you'll find the worst enemies are already inside the wire, look just like you and aren't asking this question because they already know the answer.
>>541014139Hell yes.We just don't want to go all-out on anything, for reason of collateral damage.
>>541014139You can't even win against a few towelheads in the desert.
>>541014139Are we allowed to use WMD's in your hypothetical?
>>541014139If they had a Russian approach to conflict of not caring about casualties and losses then yes they would very easily win any war.
>>541014139I am 100% confident in our abilty to unclog toilets and operate cafeterias
>>541014139no lolthe usa is now too brown and gay and womanly to project any kind of forcethey did this to themselves deliberately too
