[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


>Wisconsin. Republicans let it die in committee without a hearing, the same result this legislation has gotten every time it’s been introduced since 2019. Nearly 300 minors have been married in Wisconsin over the past decade, most of them girls marrying adult men, protected by a statutory rape exemption that only Republican inaction keeps on the books. Whether that changes will depend on who controls the legislature after the November election.

I beg conservatives and MAGA to just be fucking normal for once.
>>
>>541020772
This is why the left is the only one who can defeat the jews.
Right wing "anti semites" are always like "the jews created feminism to push for age of consent and stop ME from getting a child gf"
And then they wonder why jews call us goyem.
We will take it over from here. Try not to sabotage us
>>
File: Surething.gif (2.24 MB, 498x268)
2.24 MB GIF
A screen shot thread with 0 context will surely convince the masses
>>
>>541020772
define "child"
>>
>>541020772
>18 year olds marries 16 year old sweetheart
I don't give a shit
>>
>>541020772
Based.
Faggots that want trannies grooming kids in kindergarten are big mad
>>
>>541020921
The left just Ok'd rapists to run for office. Didn't want to exclude jews
>>
>>541020772
>>541021100
Democrats want to stop Romeo and Juliet from marrying, causing mental health crisis among Gen Z
>>
File: F8kUUXAWkAAsEX3.jpg (95 KB, 680x680)
95 KB JPG
>>541020772
https://www.erfanmedia.co/p/breaking-republicans-vote-against
>>
>>541020973

Convinced me. Nigger.
>>
>>541020772
>be normal
Fuck normal, this society is a gay fucking shithole and nobody should want to be normal.

>>541020921
How the fuck are these people even wrong, faggot? Why the fuck would you want a roastie?

>>541021162
This isn't new, this has been done since the 2000s and it ruined millennials' lives too, and both parties participated in it.
>>
>>541021499
See that is what I am talking about. Do not do that. Do not be a tard in public and make us look bad optics. Go into some pedoplanet on onion sites and discuss your perverted fantasies there
>>
File: Waiter.gif (697 KB, 400x218)
697 KB GIF
>>541021307
Im convince your reading comprehension is next to 0, Ricky Retardo
>>
>>541021554
Why when leftists are allowing child rapist to hold office
>>
oh noes the jews can't prostitute the kids if they're married already!!
>>
>>541021600
Are they now? Who?
>>
>>541020921
republicans dont even want kids to be able to use phones or computers... think about that, they'll force tech companies to put age verification at the operating system level so children can't use a phone or computer to say they're kidnapped
>>
>>541021554
>muh optics
Holy shit you're fucking retarded. How do you not understand at this point that optics do not fucking matter and never did? You really think even the best effort at maintaining optics is going to mean shit when the media is completely controlled? You really think we should attempt to appease the feels of pearl-clutching retards and roasties even if it wasn't? You're the fucking problem with this movement. You're the thing that holds us back. Fuck optics. I don't give a fuck about optics because I want to fucking win.
>>
>>541021689
Optics side already won in charlotesvile. This is why the far right since 2016 has been nothing but groypers
And now that groypers failed with fishback, someone else needs to replace them.
>>
>>541021629
https://www.kcra.com/article/california-senators-kill-bill-barring-registered-sex-offenders-from-running-for-public-office/71787622
Yes they are
>>
File: 1784356161741201.jpg (15 KB, 248x255)
15 KB JPG
>>541021307

>Convinced me
Überzeugt? Zurück in den Ofen!
>>
>>541021746
that is because one of their people was falsely added to the list.
>>
>>541021823
Oh of course no source for pedo protecting lie
>>
repedocan
>ban huawei from 5g so china can't "hack" or spy on pedos or jews
>for "national security" or china being able to destroy america's standing in the world from something they could expose
>flock cameras everywhere
>cops abusing flock cameras, put in news and arrested
>cops now under the control of people that work for flock, jews or pedos
>human traffickers now under surveillance and tracking as well by flock
>know the cops, judge won't cut them a deal if they ever decided to turn theirself in
>age verification on porn sites
>children stuck with someone that only has porn sites allowed cant use comments to reveal theyre being used for sex
>age verification at operating system level
>kids now cannot use computers or phones in the event they ever needed to call for help
>>
Are mormons driving this?
>>
>>541021736
C-Ville was almost 10 fucking years ago, things have changed a lot since then.
>>
>>541021045
>948.01 Definitions. In this chapter, the following words and phrases have the designated meanings unless the context of a specific section manifestly requires a different construction:
>948.01(1)(1)“Child” means a person who has not attained the age of 18 years, except that for purposes of prosecuting a person who is alleged to have violated a state or federal criminal law, “child” does not include a person who has attained the age of 17 years.
>>
>>541020772
What else was in the bill?
>>
>>541023462
>let me use the jewed-up government's definition instead of logic
>I'm based and redpilled tho
>>
>>541020772
Based, hopefully this will harm Americans. MAGA
>>
>>541020772
What else was in the bill, though? It's never just one law.
>>
>>541023758
I looked it up. Republicans offered a trade, if parents can't allow their children to marry they also can't allow "gender-affirming care." That seems reasonable to me. Democrats rejected it because apparently getting married is more destructive than cutting your dick off. Based democrats?
>>
>the same result this legislation has gotten every time it’s been introduced since 2019
Why is this allowed? Repeatedly spamming the same piece of legislation until is passes should not be a viable political tactic.
>>
I think politicians should make people's lives better, and I'm therefore in general more sympathetic to the Democrats in American politics, as the alternative seems to be greedy richfags
but how does banning me from marrying a loli make my life better?
>>
>>541020772
>>
File: 1609727887281.png (93 KB, 1440x1080)
93 KB PNG
Well, how are the marriages going though? Are the girls happy?

And how old are the adult men? Is this "adult" like 55 years old or "adult" as in turned 18 last week?

How are they getting these girls anyway? Are they getting kidnapped or something? Because I'm pretty sure there's already laws against that.

>>541023623
Even if it's just what it says it is, you still have to wonder about structure/implementation as well.
>We're stopping child marriages!
>YEAH!
>We're doing it by installing Flock cameras in every place of worship and regularly inspecting girls between the ages of 14 and 18 to make sure they still have their hymens!
>Wait what?!
A law can say whatever, it's the enforcement mechanisms and the definitions that really determine what it does.
>>
>>541020921
California has also blocked legislation
>>
>>541020772
Why are Democrats even bothering with this dumb shit? He's why, because they're a fake party and this shit is all fake.

>Republicans let it die in committee without a hearing, the same result this legislation has gotten every time it’s been introduced since 2019.
So they know it's pointless to do this so they just being a fake party.

Two private non jewish citizens can be married just fine even if one of them is a minor.

Jews have no business being married to non-jewish minors.

If Democrats want to protect children they can do something about piece of shit porn cop sex offenders harming and violating children physically and sexually, what have they done about that? Nothing, that's what, because they're a fake party and none of this is real.
>>
>>541020921
You're out of your fucking mind dude. Until you guys drop the progressive leftists, you will always be subverted in the same way the march on Wall Street got subverted. You will do the heavy lifting for them and then they will stab you in the back but the Bolsheviks did to the mensheviks. All that effort and you will be remembered for gay parades and conditioning children to cut their genitals off in the future. I would say you would need to divest yourself from those people before attempting to combine forces with the right leaning Commonwealth.
>>
>>541024113
It doesn't, it's supposed to improve roasties' lives at your expense. You should kick kikemerica out of your country, end feminism and get a teen schoolgirl waifu to eat sushi with.
>>
What do Wisconsin Democrats have to say and do shit all the jewish garbage media targeted to children? The music, the TV, the apps, the social media, the porn? Any legislation there? No, I didn't think so.
>>
>>541024172
>And how old are the adult men? Is this "adult" like 55 years old or "adult" as in turned 18 last week?
The former for this kind of thing. There are "Romeo and Juliet Laws" in many states that already cover the latter, including many blue states.
>How are they getting these girls anyway? Are they getting kidnapped or something? Because I'm pretty sure there's already laws against that.
Arranged marriages by any other name. Or actual grooming. How else does a middle aged man supposed to meet teenage girls and then marry them in a church?
>>
>>541020772
Fuck Demonrats(Democrats) trying to destroy Christian traditions!
>>
>>541024226
>Two private non jewish citizens can be married just fine even if one of them is a minor.
Correction, two non-jewish regular class private citizens that are the same race.
>>
>>541021167
>>541020973
There's your screenshot pretty quiet now pedorepublikike
>>
>>541024113
It doesn't. Kikes are trying to take away your freedom to love. They are demons who want all the cunny for themselves but they literally hurt lolis. Exterminate every last Kenite and demon blood.
>>
>>541024442
>lust provoking image
>>
File: 1761670337066263.gif (1.93 MB, 520x293)
1.93 MB GIF
>>541024383
Well Mr 1PBTID, I'll have to ask how you know that, since not a single article I'm finding online mentions the age range of the adults. The only quote I got that came close was saying the marriages are to adults "over 18," with some marriages being between minors. So if every single one of those marriages was to a 19 year old or a 20 year old, that wouldn't technically be a lie and therefore printable, but it also wouldn't be what they're implying it is. The articles also show that these exemptions are being made exclusively for 16 year olds and 17 year olds, no younger, with the majority being girls and a few being boys who are minors marrying adult women (who nobody seems much concerned with).

The articles all state that this is a waiver the parents sign. What I'm being asked to believe is that hundreds of parents in Wisconsin are taking total leave of their senses and granting permission for some old pedo to marry their little girl (or occasionally boy). I'm supposed to believe this over the more reasonable interpretation that parents are simply allowing 19 year old boys to marry 16 year old girls.

And I'm supposed to believe this despite nobody being willing to state in writing anything about the age ranges of the adults in the marriages other than that it's "over 18," which would include 18 years old and one day.
>>
>>541020772
What else was hidden in the bill??
>>
>>541020772
The bill probably had something heinous attached to it like lowering age of majority and voting age to 16. This is how dems operate.
>>
>>541024733
Because I personally know a child bride who married a 40 year old man after pressure from her parents and pastor. They call it "courting" and it's as close to arranged marriage as they can get it legally. The dude tries to convince the parents and the parents pressure their teenager to go along with it. Nobody has statistics because they don't track the age of marriage members.
Other states R&J laws have limits, like allowing an 18 year old to continue dating a 16 year old they were already dating when they were 17, or allowing a 19 year old to date a 17 year old. They have upper age limits.
>>
>>541025595
>Nobody has statistics because they don't track the age of marriage members.
Okay, so aside from your one anecdote, nobody even knows how the exemption is getting used. Shouldn't somebody figure that out first before trying to repeal it?

Also Romeo and Juliet laws don't apply here at all, those are for sex not marriage. It just says an 18 year old isn't raping a 17 year old if they started dating a year ago. Marriage is a bit more serious than that.
>>
>>541025595
What a load of rubbish. Modern dating is extremely degenerative. You would rather have a girl waste her youth whoring herself trying to find 'the one' instead of marrying an older stable man who can provide for a family? No one the non-whites are taking over. This is how it was done it in past, and it will continue to grow as men need more and more time to build wealth just to have a family. It's only roasties and young men who seethe over this.
>>
>>541025806
This is also for sex. It allows an exception to statutory rape. But instead of the exception being "close in age", it's "got married". There are a lot of reasons why a teenager in a deeply conservative state might marry someone, and "because her father told her to" is definitely up there above "because her boyfriend turned 18 and they have to marry to stay together".
The one I know did it because then she could move out of her abusive parents house. She was basically whoring herself out to an older man in exchange for a roof over her head. She didn't love him.
Did you know the last civil war widow died in 2020? She was the last because she was married off at the age of 17 to a 93 year old Civil War veteran in 1936. Probably for the inheritance, but what was he getting out of it?
>>
>>541026006
>but what was he getting out of it?
Prime virgin pussy
>>
>>541025948
Make it easier for younger men to accumulate wealth so women won't have to be pressured into marrying men old enough to be their father.
>>
>>541026006
The problem I'm having with this is that it is being strongly implied that some Epstein shit is happening here but when you look for the receipts nobody has any. I'm up for banning the practice if it causes some harm, but if it doesn't it's just some ideological witch hunt and probably not even that at root, but rather just something Dems do there occasionally to get a few headlines and juice up their tiny base for elections. If it causes harm, where is the harm? Why isn't there so much as one sob story available about some poor girl getting sold for cash by her parents? Aside from your story which is obviously fake since you just magically appeared as soon as I asked any questions about this article.

Absent that, it's like Cory Booker banning lynchings about 150 years too late, who cares?
>>
>>541026195
Aristotle says the ideal marriage age is 17 for women and 37 for men. This was over 2000'years ago.

Frankly most guys under 25 are not marriage material even if they have money.
>>
>>541026195
The real red pill here is the women would rather marry a old chad over a young chud.
>>
>>541026248
>a story is fake because it wasn't delivered unprompted
Ok.
>>
>>541020772
I dont trust a single thing democrats or republicans cry about the other side blocking because 99% of the time the thing theyre crying about is mixed in with 200 other things that are retarded bullshit that rightfully gets shut down
>>
>>541026389
It was prompted, that's the problem. Goodbye retard. Come back when you have more than stories.
>>
>>541020921
TRVKE
>>
>>541026497
See, you're almost there. The phrase you're actually looking for is "anecdotes don't mean anything". There is nothing I can say against that. "Your story is fake" actually means you do put stock in anecdotes, but only ones that support your own position. Which in this case I guess is that adults should get to fuck teenagers if they marry them first, regardless of age. Nasty faggot.
>>
>>541020772
That's weird because Liberals in San Francisco wanted to legalize having sex with Kids

What the fuck is one to believe anymore?
>>
>>541026564
>"Your story is fake" actually means you do put stock in anecdotes,
No it doesn't retard, you just added that on to try to have something. I don't care for anecdotes and also you're deliberately lying about having one, which is an extra mark against you. Goodbye retard, you failed today.
>>
>>541026643
>nu uh
Compelling. But hey, you got there in the end.
>>
>>541026691
What do you even think that post means, retard? Try a little harder at another last reply, I'll let you have it this time.
>>
>>541026774
No you won't.
>>
>>541026568
Why the fuck would you make something like that up and think we'd just beleive it how retarded are you?
>>
>>541026274
>old guy vouches for marriage with men old enough to your father

Wow
>>
File: 1787102323065891.jpg (12 KB, 605x259)
12 KB JPG
>>541026274
>>
>>541020772
Child marriage is based, actually.
Once Islam rules Europe we'll apply it over here as well.
>>
>>541021115
This. Kill yourselves trannies.
>>
>>541020772
Old men must have their dreams crushed.

Kronus must be destroyed.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.