[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Given the SCOTUS ruling that upheld "Jus Soli" and the constant Republican push to enshrine "Personhood starts at inception", Then How long till the argument of "Citizenship starts at Inception" is brought to the courts?
>>
>>541037482
You need to go back.
>>
To conflate the word "born" in the Constitution with "personhood" (however that's defined) seems disingenuous at best.
>>
>>541037626
Whats the definition of "born"
>>
>>541037482
>at inception
So the moment your parents start thinking about having kids? Wouldn't conception be a better standard?
>>
>>541038669
Nah, WE HAVE to go further, We even have to protect the IDEA of a Baby.. IF we let parents kill the idea of a baby, they wont even try to have a baby, WE NEED TO REPLENISH THE WORK FORCE.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.