[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/19/us/karmelo-anthony-new-trial-hearing
>>
File: news4.jpg (961 KB, 2000x2800)
961 KB JPG
>>541060563
these are great for news
>also
that nog does not have a chance in hell in next court case too bad you got damn criminal piece of shit
>>
>>541060563
You can just remove a judge? On whos authority?
>>
>>541060873
He cucked out and stepped away willingly because he's afraid of antifa or something.
>>
https://archive.is/C7lwd
Fuck off MSM nigger. We use archive links here.

>Karmelo's lawyer requested a retrial
>there needs to be a hearing to determine if they'll do that or not
>Judge John Roach who presided over the first trial, has been ordered removed by another visiting Judge
>visiting Judge Harle said he ordered it because of how it would look to a third party if Judge Roach presided (over the hearing to retry)

So now we need to wait for the hearing under a new judge (probably not Harle if I'm reading it right) to see if they'll vacate the previous ruling and re-hear the case. Problem is the jury pool is now TOTALLY tainted. Everyone already knows he was found guilty the first time. IANAL so I don't know if they'll take that into consideration or not.
>>
>>541061018
Not to mention blacks now know to not show bias during jury selection so they'll do everything they can to pack that jury with as many nogs as possible. Mistrial after Mistrial til the state gets tired of the case. Watch this retard walk.
>>
>>541060873
Misunderstanding. This is just a basic removal IF a retrial occurs. They specifically requested a retrial based on the judge, so this ruling just says IF it's retried, the judge should be reassigned.
>>
File: 30c.jpg (85 KB, 782x782)
85 KB JPG
>>541060563
It would be hilarious if he was set free and then somebody shot him.
>>
There's actually a legal precedent, if you are black/brown there has to be atleast a few people on the jury who look like you, overturning this will be a cake walk for the welfare appointed attorney
>>
>>541060563
>suburban Dallas jury
What kind of niggerfaggotwoman dog whistle is that.
>>
File: 4754389564378563478.jpg (122 KB, 1024x1018)
122 KB JPG
>>541060563
Wow, that's crazy, how could that have happened
>>
CHRIST IS KANG!
>>
File: 1786577231570140.jpg (315 KB, 1280x720)
315 KB JPG
>>541060873
>On whos authority?
bigger judge
>>
>>541062034
he must be really guilty is the niggerfaggotwoman contingent found him guilty
>>
>>541060563
Of course retrial hearings don't involve the original judge. What a retarded article. He wasn't "removed".



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.