[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_0421.jpg (79 KB, 1016x406)
79 KB JPG
So Israel’s number 1 defender privately said his Jewish paypig was being annoying (if there is more to this tell me), so they had to kill him. And all Israel had to do to get their number 1 hater on their side was just pay or blackmail him? All of this just to cover for the assassination that didnt even seem necessary in the first place? I genuinely dont get this.
Also the other times Kirk said something that sounds redpilled, people say this is evidence he was “turning on the jews”, but Nick Fuentes saying every single redpilled thing except for buying this narrative means that all of that is evidence hes a limited hangout. Why arent the Charlie clips evidence hes a limited hangount? Especially when he was literally somebody on Jewish payroll. People say Fuentes is supposed to appear redpilled but then be bluepilled when it matters, but isnt that exactly what Kirk was doing when he ended up supporting bombing Iran and covering up the Epatein files? Help me understand why Israel had to kill him out of nowhere with seemingly no interest in just paying him more money or blackmailing him or doing literally anything else (if he was actually “turning”)
>>
>>541067304
Israel wanted to do two things.
1. kill the American left, specifically the DSA
2. drum up support for the war in Iran.

The first one failed, but only because of Owens and Tucker. But the second one succeeded.
>>
>>541067304
The alt-right movement is full of simple minded fools. Look how MAGA simps for Trump whenhe breaks every promise. Never let them forget they are cucks.
>>
File: 1772382456318924.png (57 KB, 847x707)
57 KB PNG
>>541067526
>But the second one succeeded.
Nigger you lie
>>
>>541067304
You really think you can talk with these people with reason and logic?
>look at this private massage it proves that this public figure who never said anything negative about Israel in public was killed by israel, but not this obviously antisemitic public person who does and says antisemitic stuff on and offline is still very well
They are beyond reasoning
>>
>>541067304
>Israel’s
NOPE.

>WHO is Israel?

Those who strive to steal our present and our future have already stolen our past. WE are who they claim to be. They have stolen our history, our lands, even our ancestors.
On top of that, they have the audacity to label us Amalek. They trade their own position for ours. They seek revenge for what Jacob did to Esau. They think if they wear the skin of dead Israelites that God will recognize them as His true people. They act out their hatred of God for which God hates them. Then, they blame you and tell you it's God's fault.

Our kin have set their seal to testify that WE are of Israelite descent in the Declaration of Arbroath.
Who am I to believe, my family though long dead, or those who seek to erase my family? Am I to swear allegiance to a false race and a false god just because others refuse to hear the truth of who they are?
Our people were the Scythians. Those same Scythians were renamed by the Romans as Germans, the “true” people. We will not find the roots of our race in 20th century politics. We must go back far further. We must be willing to confront lies that are over 2700 years old.
The choice between religion and race is a false one, unless you choose a false history and a false god, as your (((enemies))) would prefer. True history and the true God need not be separated.
Many hate the Bible, but it is the story of OUR family.
It is you who prevent your people from being whole.
You have to let go of the lies you love.
It's time for the family reunion.

Some YouTube resources:
@IsraelFound

@richtidwell

@truthinhistory

@TruthVids

@americaspromiseministries2congrats on being a normie

@YairDavidiy

@ShepherdChapelStudent
/playlist?list=PLiA6kuKpn0D02ZxrOPIOQB0-Gs5VnYlMj

kinsmanredeemer (.) com/

britishisrael (.) co (.) uk/

overcomebabylon (.) com/statement-of-faith
>>
>>541067526
>kill the American left, specifically the DSA
>drum up support for the war in Iran
Ok so how does killing Kirk do either of those things? Kirk was an “anti war” person that supported bombing Iran, he would be one of the biggest assets for convincing the skeptical base to support the president (just as he did with Iran and Epstein earlier in the year). Meanwhile killing him would drive his audience into the arms of Tucker/Candace/Nick, all of whom are vocally and far more explicitly against not only the Iran war but Israel
in general, so that doesnt make sense either.
As far as destroying the DSA goes, wouldnt they make the killer more explicitly DSA? Aside from “bella chao” and “eat this fascist” we dont really have anything tying Tyler to politics at all other than having a tranny bf. Why not just say he was a giga Hasan fan Palestine protester if its all made up anyway? So that doesnt really make sense to me either.
>>541067890
Maybe but I’m not trying to reason with anybody I just want to understand the thought process
>>
>>541067304
Charlie was killed by muslims. But people aren’t ready for that trvke.
>>
>>541068507
You will not get what you try to get. This is not pol from 10 years ago where you could find smart people with extreme opinions that you can discuss with.
Now people spew something out then flock to another Indian Jew or Tranny thread if the discussion requires basic thinking.
>>
>>541068507
>Ok so how does killing Kirk do either of those things
Associate the killer with the DSA and Islam.
>>
File: FB.jpg (99 KB, 1200x628)
99 KB JPG
>>
>>541067304
Sorry you need to go to /tv/ for this streamer shit.
>>
>>541068915
you do realize that there have been two fake assasinations of Trump so far?
and since both of them failed to drum up support, more extreme measures had to be taken. Someone had to die.
And it was someone who Trump liked the least and was the most expendable.
Out of all conservatives, Trump dislikes massie the most, but killing him would just make everyone believe that he did it, since they hated each other.
Kirk was perfect since he was nominally pro Trump but in practice constantly counter signaled him. He wasn't sad even a bit when he died, he went right to talking about the Baalroom
>>
>>
File: chuck.jpg (48 KB, 485x646)
48 KB JPG
I'll explain.
>>
>>541067304
The narrative is that Kirk would have stopped the Iran war
>>
>>541067747
if he was alive it'd be even less kike
>>
>>541069416
You just made everything you said up didn't you?
>>
>>541067526
Kirk would be pushing for a draft and calling you a bad goy right now if he was alive
>>
>>541069710
(((prosecutors)))
>>
>>541069813
Maybe, but there is no doubt that Trump and Israel had him killed because he just wasn't good ENOUGH for them.
>>
File: 1758137731523770.jpg (225 KB, 1125x769)
225 KB JPG
>>541069700
Friendly fire. Don't call me jewish.
>>
>>541069315
>Associate the killer with the DSA and Islam.
I mean they didnt do that though. Unless you are referring to random people on social media, obviously everybody is going to be trying to use every story to push their agenda. The left was first saying the killer was a Groyper because they found a picture of Tyler doing the slavic squat and they put it next to a picture of Pepe doing the slavic squat. As the saying goes
>Never let a good tragedy go to waste
I dont see how any of this suggests Israel killed him or gives an explanation to any of my questions, especially considering thr evidence and messaging from both the FBI and the admin dont really serve to accomplish either of the things you suggested. So if Israel killed Kirk then fabricated the evidence and patsy in coordination with the FBI they did a really bad job at framing the DSA or antisemites.
>>541069416
>they absolutely HAD to kill Charlie Kirk to vaguely “drum up support”, thats why Trump acted like he barely cared because he was trying to drum up support for Israel
Youre losing me
>>
You're watching a t.v show to "influence" "you fucks" who don't watch t.v and it's working. Had to get your attention somehow.
>>
>>541069574
Ive seen some people say that, I’m trying to understand the logic
>>
File: 1787077068316317.mp4 (3.71 MB, 1280x768)
3.71 MB
3.71 MB MP4
>>541067890
>never said anything
>>
>>541067304
charlie kirk was right about to take a stand against israel after never saying anything negative about them his entire career and getting paid tens of millions of dollars from them not to do so.
if you doubt this you are a jewish shill.
he was just about to flip.
>>
Candace owens is a sociopathic grifter. She has made millions of dollars making up nonsense narratives about the Kirk assassination. The fact that people are even talking about a sub 100 iq woman’s opinion is proof enough that any right wing movement has no legs. I’m sure there has been massive amounts of time and money invested into discrediting Nick Fuentes and flooding the spaces he inhabits, but the fact that he has to go on his show and seriously reply to claims of Kirk appearing to owens in a dream is insane. The vast majority of current right wing audiences might be even stupider and more cattle like than Reddit left wing marvel slop fans. The goyim just want cheap entertainment, they are no longer interested in the truth.
>>
Go recharge your immunity ie; gfy
>>
File: 1787069982597271.gif (3.37 MB, 684x421)
3.37 MB GIF
>>541070054
kill yourself kike
>>
>>541069859
I think they killed him because they knew Fuentes and Hasan were going to destroy his ass in debate and were scared of an even further shift in hostility towards them
>>
>>541070148
Candace owens is in favor of mass migration and miscegenation. Do you agree with Candace owens on those issues?
>>
>>541067304
Netanyahu offered Kirk $25 million to work for Israel or else, Kirk refused an offer you can't refuse.
>>
>>541069961
>The left was first saying the killer was a Groyper
yeah but they are retarded and nobody took them seriously. the administration was saying he was with the DSA
>I dont see how any of this suggests Israel killed him or gives an explanation to any of my questions, especially considering thr evidence and messaging from both the FBI and the admin dont really serve to accomplish either of the things you suggested. So if Israel killed Kirk then fabricated the evidence and patsy in coordination with the FBI they did a really bad job at framing the DSA or antisemites.
Because they failed. They failed because of people like Tucker, ultimately. If Trump went out and suspended habeas corpus like Lincoln and started purging pro-gaza movements, he would get destroyed next election, or maybe there would even be a civil war.
But you can clearly see how an event like this *could* be used to garner sympathy for the pro-Israel cause and make government crackdowns on antisemites more acceptable.
>>they absolutely HAD to kill Charlie Kirk to vaguely “drum up support”, thats why Trump acted like he barely cared because he was trying to drum up support for Israel
Someone had to go. Given Trump-Kirk relationship it made sense that Kirk was chosen.
>>
>>541070015
I asked this question in the OP. Kirk theorists say Fuentes is a fed working for Mossad because he doesnt believe Israel killed Kirk, so him being aggressively anti-Israel for 10 years and continuing to be aside from believing this one theory is actually evidence that he is a limited hangout that is trying to trick people into thinking hes on their side. How does this logic not apply to Kirk who was literally funded by Jews to the tune of 100+ mil annually when he said mild hot takes like this while continuing to support them and advocate for the censorship of antisemites? Is this not the most clear cut case of a limited hangout/mossad actor/agent etc? All this comment from Kirk does is serve to, like it clearly did with you, convince people that hes an independent voice despite the fact that his opinions are never strong enough to lead anywhere other than supporting the GOP and the next Zionist president.
>>
>>541069416
One of the biggest red flags for the “Israel killed the campus debatebro” crowd is the conspiracy stacking. It’s one conspiracy on top of another on top of another on top of another on top of another… Nothing is real to you people.
>>
>>541070373
But turning point recirves 100s of millions from Israel and Jewish donors every year. Netanyahu doesnt need to offer Kirk anything because his entire organization is built and exists on Jewish money, he already accepted the offer years ago.
>>
>>541070373
If he was alive, he’d be their biggest and loudest supporter right now and you’d see a much larger effort to recruit idiots
>>
>>541070454
Netenyahu coming out to say
>I didn’t do it
Is why a lot of people think he did it
>>
>>541067304
>So Israel’s number 1 defender privately said his Jewish paypig was being annoying (if there is more to this tell me), so they had to kill him
It's a well poisoning lie, Charlie Kike was top Goyim.
>>
Nick Fuentes is a nazi idiot
>>
>>541070397
>yeah but they are retarded and nobody took them seriously
And? I’m saying people on social media pushing an agenda is not evidence of anything, everyone does that.
>the administration was saying he was with the DSA
Were people in the admin saying that on twitter or was the admin saying that officially? Because the FBI and admin made no official claims about Robinson’s political activity. JD Vance or whoever else saying he was a leftist isnt really evidence that the entire thing was faked in order for them to crack down on the left (which never even happened anyway)
>Because they failed. They failed because of people like Tucker, ultimately. If Trump went out and suspended habeas corpus like Lincoln and started purging pro-gaza movements, he would get destroyed next election, or maybe there would even be a civil war.
But the admin did nothing long before the left and Muslims started amplifying the Israel narrative, there was no indication that the admin was going to use Kirks death to do anything. And since the evidence is all fake, I guess they also “failed” before they even started by not making the fake evidence point directly to Robinson being a pro-Palestine leftist. They “failed” something they didnt even try, I guess.
>Someone had to go. Given Trump-Kirk relationship it made sense that Kirk was chosen.
Why does someone have to go? You never gave a reason for this. How does Trumps lack of interest in Kirks death prove he had him killed in order to drum up support? Wouldnt he be, yknow, drumming up support?
>>
>>541070678
A pro jewish nazi, much like azov
a walking contradiction
>>
>>541070760
>Why does someone have to go? You never gave a reason for this. How does Trumps lack of interest in Kirks death prove he had him killed in order to drum up support? Wouldnt he be, yknow, drumming up support?
False flags. Why would the US government let 9/11 happen? duh
>>
>>541067304
Charlie Kirk went off script and was killed for it, it's that simple. His script was to be the right wing pro israel guy that boomers and young republicucks listen to for guidance. Spic Fuentes's script is to be the paid opposition to gather all the young potential anti-semites and keep their views limited to things the jews can control and their actions limited to nothing beyond hate comments on the internet. Charlie Kirk went off script and started legitimately questioning Israel to Israel first crowd, which could seriously damage the already dwindling Israeli-friendly sentiment in America. Nick Fuentes isn't convincing a single boomer of anything no matter what he says.
>>
File: 1786731997598415.webm (1.36 MB, 540x960)
1.36 MB
1.36 MB WEBM
>>541070419
One had a larger audience and was actually a threat, they obviously couldn't buy him out anymore so they had to get rid of him. One is a legitimate threat t o them, the other is a literal joke an fbi infirnant, yes only a complete kike or imbecile wouldn't recognize the distinctions.
>>
>>541070847
I don’t get why you people think Charlie wouldn’t have flipped-flopped back to being pro-Israel, especially when Dear Leader went to war for them
>>
>>541070847
exactly and precisely, the crowd he had was the crowd kikes fear:>>541070860
>>
>>541070558
Israel assassinates leaders of countries and military generals, not podcasters. Your sort vastly overestimates how influential this guy was. He was not a leader of millions.
>>
>>541070931
it doesn't matter what he wouldn't and would have done, he spoke against the war and he got murdered for it.
>>
>>541067304
Josh Hammer and a rabbi got on a zoom call and basically threatened Charlie
he knew they might try something and they did
they had him completely surrounded with glowniggers and traitors, including Dan Flood and Brian Harpole
>>
>>541070931
I'm sure he would have, but that doesn't matter, he already showed that he was capable of disobedience, and that's too dangerous to let slide, especially for someone with as large of a following as Charlie Kirk. He was probably the only person besides Donald Trump who could have actually gotten the Israel first boomers to start reconsidering their allegiance to Israel if he started getting too loud about his suspicions of them.
>>
>>541067890
if you're going to shill like that at least know what you're talking about because just lying like that makes your whole case look fraudulent (it is)
>>
>>541070048
I guess you missed the whole thing where he said he had no choice but to "leave the pro Israel cause" lol
you niggers are so stupid
>>
Candace owens and tucker “my wife is Jewish” Carlson are both owned by Jews. They are whipping up anti semitism online to extreme degrees based on obviously fallacious information. The Jews will leak the video(s) of Tyler Robinson shooting Kirk and there will be a bipartisan push for censorship and arresting people for hate speech with newly implemented technologies. Owens and carlson will be unaffected and continue to live in Jewish gated communities.
>>
File: IMG_20260819_172331.jpg (134 KB, 946x894)
134 KB JPG
>>541070939
>Your sort vastly overestimates how influential this guy was. He was not a leader of millions.
He actually was, lol, kike, but you knew this, in this thread where you kikes pretend nick commanded one tenth of the power and influence charlie had and argue that he actually supported bombing iran and covered up the files.
>>
charlie kirk cursed israel
guess what happened lol
>>
>>541067304
I don't know why faggots do the crazy things that they do. it probably has something to do with being faggots.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rpU51S26hrA&ra=m
>>
>>541070847
>His script was to be the right wing pro israel guy that boomers and young republicucks listen to for guidance
Not at all. If you watched Charlie Kirk like I did you would know his niche was always as an anti-establishent character designed specifically to appeal to the youth. Thats why his opinions became radically more right wing after Groyper War 1 (except on Israel) because his job is to appeal to young people and bring them into the GOP, if the young people are way more right wing than him he will lose the audience and irrelevant. Thats also why he was introducing some Israel criticism into his rhetoric. Its funny because not only is he not going off script, this is exactly the script that Jews are laying out for how to recapture the youth. In their hitpiece on Nick (https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/09/us/politics/nick-fuentes-trump.html) the NYT article, written by a Jew, says that the best way to secure a pro-Israel right and recapture the trust of the youth ans fight people like Fuentes is to start introducing a controlled amount of Israel and Jewish criticism into the talking points of the mainstream, otherwise they will lose rhe youth entirely. Is that not what Kirk was doing? What makes you think they would kill him for doing what they suggest?
>>541070860
Nick had a larger audience then Kirk (literally more live viewership), the difference is that Kirk was funded and promoted by social media and Jewish money so he had a far bigger presence on the political stage and in IRL events, making him more influential. For some reason they didnt even try to diminish the influence that they give him, they just killed him?
>>
>>541071054
>Josh Hammer and a rabbi got on a zoom call and basically threatened Charlie
About what? As far as I know some jews were made he would talk to Tucker, who is still alive and well and got to absorb Charlies audience.
>>
>>541067304
Imagine believing Spic Fuentes have the same relevance as the literal main voice of the American conservative youth.
Literally only incels listen to Fuentes. And the kikes know how faggot he is. Kikes KNOW he would corrupt himself for money, while Kirk not. Kirk actually had principles.

So the solution was simple. Plata for one, plomo for the other.
>>
>>541071345
TPUSA was funded and created by Jewish money, his “influence” is what was given to him by Jews. His live show audience was far lower than Nick’s. Kirk as an individual personality was bot an influential figure outside the institutions he existed in.
>>
>>541071345
Kirk was literally owned by Jews. Bibi had a personal correspondence with him. He studied the Talmud with his rabbi. He was killed by a leftists in a homosexual relationship with a tranny because he thought Kirk was a nazi and wanted to kill trans people.
Do you really think retconning kirks life into being secretly anti Israel will have a desired effect you want? Obviously the Jews and Israel have to much power, but basing your criticisms on obviously false premises will come back to bite you in the long run. Or are you just so stupid you actually believe the insane ramblings of an illiterate negress who said Charlie Kirk appeared to her in a dream.
>>
>>541071345
He was yet another college libtard status = owned debatebro. Trump loves associating with those people. He even had dinner with Nick Fuentes once because he thought he was the same thing. But please keep yelling that he was an influential national figure. All it does is discredit your entire premise.
>>
>>541067304
>And all Israel had to do to get their number 1 hater on their side was just pay or blackmail him? All of this just to cover for the assassination that didnt even seem necessary in the first place? I genuinely dont get this.
Jews wanted to cheap out. They're jews. It's what they do. Why pay 1 million to someone when they can pay 10k to someone else to kill them?
>>
>>541067304
Their interested in the self-serving benefits of delegitimizing israel as a medium for some other goal, dependent on the faction. Leftists are anti-imperialist, want more national influence, and deflect blame/punishment. Liberals want muh human rights. Progressives want to inverse the natural power dynamics of historic injustices. Muslims want more influence and regional stability against their regional rival. Nationalists want to have autonomy over their country over foreign and parasitic subversives. Ecelebs want to grift, gossip, and increase their influence. Even some "truth seekers" are consumed by paranoid distrusts that ends up with them just being contrarian to mainstream narratives due to previous government underhanded moves and any little petty room for doubt.
Any rational man can see that there's no compelling motive for israel or jews to take out the guy that shilled for them for years and acted as a coalition builder who successfully eroded a good portion of the "based" right/moderate-far right, having pivoted right due to the help of people and events pushing the overton window. Nick Fuentes directly pushed Kirk on his moderated stances in around 2019 iirc, getting him to move further right on immigration, feminism, fags/trannies, and religion.

These people/factions who cynically push those lies are retarded and short sighted. Kirk, TPUSA, ZOG/Trump, israel, and jews have a lot of contemptible aspects that shoupd be curtailed (coming from a nationalist perspective). Engaging in such low iq tactics with no regard to the merits of truth and probability bolsters these blights and their position as people will turn sympathetic, side with the wronged percieved underdog, and view their opposition as rabidly unjust and irrational with underhanded, suspicious self-interest.
It's the same mechanism found often in controversial topics like race or democracy. You'll find a plethora engaging in irrationality for different underhanded goals.
>>
>>541071542
Spic Fuentes has more live viewers than Kirk ever had on his shows. Kirk is more influential than Nick because Kirk was promoted with jewish money and on all social media platforms, invited to all events, incorporated into the GOP and political machine. Kirk was literally one of the biggest sellout grifter mouthpieces in politics who recieved 100s of millions in Jewish money a year to TPUSA and you think this is evidence that he was principled and unbuyable, but the guy banned from everything for talking about Israel is the one who clearly is easily bought off. Break down this logic for me
>>
>>541071786
Trump only had dinner with Nick since Ye brought him along. He didn't know who he was.
>>
File: 1786756406353308.png (315 KB, 597x803)
315 KB PNG
>>541071298
>on obviously fallacious information
kikes are the worst.
>>
>>541070419
When you're the shabbos goy, you're obligated to go along with everything the jew says. Because if you don't, opponents will point at you and go "wow, even the shabbos goy doesn't agree with you!" and the jew will seethe and point at you and go "filthy goy, you're all the same! conspiring against me... oy vey".
It's BECAUSE Kirk went along with so much they had to kill him. They could just write anyone else off as just another antisemite, but not their shabbos goy.
>>
>>541071798
Did this make sense in your head before you said it
>>
>>541067304
>People say Fuentes is supposed to appear redpilled but then be bluepilled when it matters
correct.
>>
>>541070939
>Israel assassinates leaders of countries and military generals, not podcasters.
>yes they assassinate regularly but not THOSE people!
you're a faggot sheep and also a faggot
>>
>>541071542
What a retarded spico-negroid inversion of Kirk and Fuentes.
>>
>>541072043
>When you're the shabbos goy, you're obligated to go along with everything the jew says
But in this NYT article written by a Jew they say the strategy right now is for mainstream conservatives to introduce some controlled criticism of Israel into their talking points in order to slow down the rise and appeal of people like Fuentes. They say if Fuentes monopolizes Israel criticism on the right then they will lose the youth to Nazism for good >>541071429
So your premise goes against what the Jews themselves are saying they should do, and Kirks actions are exactly in line with what the Jews are saying they should do. So why should I go with your analysis?
>>
>>541071429
Kirk wasn't banned from Youtube and forced to only Rumble like Nick was, so he was bigger if you take his full social media presence, unfair as it was.
>>
>>541071429
why wouldn't they, he refused to be bought by them and the more important part, he had a way larger audience, not even 10x can justify the discrepancy, plus like I said, the audience is not the same, one is actually a threat to kikes, the other isn't.
>rhe youth entirely. Is that not what Kirk was doing?
This is a kike talking point/theory, imagine, unironically arguing that kikes want a "little" criticism so they don't "completely" lose it, Retard, kikes are literally trying to claim that antisemitism will slow down because "people will be 'allowed' to be slightly more critical of Pissrael", and not only that but that it's gonna be how to actually turn them TO pro Israel, some of the most demented shit ever because we are antisemitic despite the propaganda, censorship and outright shilling, and we will continue to only be mainstream even more so, as all polls show, Pissrael has no "capture the right", lmao.
>>
>>541072252
>So your premise goes against what the Jews themselves are saying they should do
My premise goes against what the jews are publishing for (you) to read. Why are you taking them at their word?
They say "diversity is our strength", yet they refuse Ethiopian jewish converts and sterilize them. Why? The more truthful phrase would be "(your) diversity is (our) strength".

Rather than accepting what is put in front of you, you should first question why are they saying it.
It's information warfare.
>>
>>541072519
Oh I agree he was “bigger”, but his audience (meaning people that actually tune in to him specifically) was not. His influence was based on what was afforded to him, not the raw audience numbers he built as a personality.
>>
>>541072252
>kikes say to win we have to pretend antisemitism
>how is that fake antisemitic performance than Kirk telling kikes to screw themselves
Gee, yeah, that's a hard one.
>>
>>541072628
he was many times larger reach and many times larger audience and many times more influential sice his audience wasn't a bunch or retarded goypers, fringe and otherwise there to make antisemitism appear retarded, plus imagine thinking that he's not a fed, lol, most blatant informant psy op that existed.
>>
>>541072628
True. I'd give him more credit for his personal merits on the audience despite intense institutional backing, but it's a minor thing.
>>
>>541071989
It's funny how everyone on-side with jews has some massive sprawing mega-millionaire mansion. Kirk, Levin, Trump, whatever. While the people on the other side live in a townhouse if they're lucky. It's a consistent pattern.
>>
>>541067304
The Israeli theory is bullshit, but it's funny and only zionists are countersignaling it because it could tear the GOP in half

>>541067526
>kill the American left, specifically the DSA
only the DSA, they're fine with a philosemitic left.
>drum up support for the war in Iran.
Charlie claimed he was against an Iran war, but he was a party man and would have most likely fallen in line like the good goy he was.
>The first one failed, but only because of Owens and Tucker.
nigger come on, cuckservatives were never going to do shit against DA LEFT
>>
>>541071714
>He was killed by a leftists in a homosexual relationship with a tranny because he thought Kirk was a nazi and wanted to kill trans people.
Kike
>Do you really think retconning kirks life into being secretly anti Israel will have a desired effect you want?
kike
>Obviously the Jews and Israel have to much power, but basing your criticisms on obviously false premises will come back to bite you in the long run. Or are you just so stupid you actually believe the insane ramblings of an illiterate negress who said Charlie Kirk appeared to her in a dream.
kike
>>
>>541072530
>he refused to be bought by them and the more important part
Charlie had probably recieved close to double digit billions of dollars in Jewish money for TPUSA by that point in his life.
>he had a way larger audience, not even 10x can justify the discrepancy
But that was because he is promoted and funded by them? Literally “bought out” in the most explicit sense. When the crackdown on right wing voices happened from 2019-2021, every single conservative in America was banned off social media except for the people working for two groups: DW and TPUSA.
>imagine, unironically arguing that kikes want a "little" criticism so they don't "completely" lose it
Did you read the article? Thats exactly what they are suggesting. Jews dont care how many people criticize Israel as long as their guys are the ones being put in power. For example, do you think JD Vance is /your guy/ because some absurd jewish jester like Mark Levin says hes antisemitic on social media? Do I need to remind you how they talked about Trump? Do you feel smart for “seeing through” the jewish propaganda and supporting Trump anyway?
>>
>>541073106
Charlie had probably recieved close to double digit billions of dollars in Jewish money for TPUSA by that point in his life.
And he was obviously a lot of investment on part of Pissrael, thanks for making my case why they had to kill him.
>But that was because he is promoted and funded by them? Literally “bought out” in the most explicit sense. When the crackdown on right wing voices happened from 2019-2021, every single conservative in America was banned off social media except for the people working for two groups: DW and TPUSA.
Kike, you tried to claim spic fuentes had more appeal, greater reach, bigger audience. Now "yeah he had it all because of jew bux" Maybe, but obviously he had his own influence, his own person, and his own appeal that jew bux backed, and that was many times more influential, larger, more mainstream and also more threatening to flipping, than spic fuentes unironic honeypot for retards.
>>
That's nice but guess what. He's alive somewhere on this planet. You'll see. Then you can all take turns having sex with him. Am right aren't I.
>>
>>541072588
>My premise goes against what the jews are publishing for (you) to read
The NYT is targeted toward liberal, mostly centrist boomers who are largely pro-Israel. What do you think that jews agenda would be for saying that is the strategy jews should take but not really mean it? Alternatively, what makes you think the jewish people pushing the narratives you believe, like Max Blumenthal/Dan Bilzerian/Owen Benjamin/Milo/Sneako pushing the Israel killed Kirk narrative, or even CIA agents like Joe Kent or Carlson, are telling the truth and on your side? Are you questioning what is put in front of you? A better question, which one is being “put in front of you” more: some obscure NYT article you never read from a year ago where a jew reveals the gameplan (then never mentions it again), or “Israel killed Kirk” shit?
>>
>>541072166
Pure projection, niggerkikefaggot.
There's no convincing motive whem you game it out, only retarded, needless risks all around. On top of all of it, people like Tucker Carlson would've been a bigger and better target in comparison if you'd gocdown this line of thought dealing with a influential rightwinger that had a change of heart, moving the right to become more anti-israel. He had far bigger reach with worse criticism for longer too.
Kirk was easily bribed as he was the coalition builder. He only got a bit more critical of israel due to youth pressure and some donors pulling out. All of it with the intention of gaining back credibility to keep the right ultimately israel friendly as much as possible, even discussing the matter with his personal rabbi on talkong points the day before his assassination. Face it, you're a low iq nigger.
>>
>>541072664
Sorry I dont understand what youre saying here
>>541072813
Kirk was many times larger and more influential because he recieved 100s of millions from pro-Israel billionaires and the federal government directly every year. In your mind, this is evidence that he was an organically influential anti-Zionist freedom fighter and the person who was banned and censored from everything including the institutions and events of the former is actually working for the government. Explain this to me
>>
>>541068507
>he would be one of the biggest assets for convincing the skeptical base to support the president (just as he did with Iran and Epstein earlier in the year)
Charlie Kirk flipping to support protecting Epstein's clients was a shameful act. I am sorry he died without repenting.
>>
>>541073326
sorry brah, you seen the neck hit, clearly not a rifle because the shirt moving like it did and before the hit, but more importantly, that was him that got took out, unless they put him back together for whatever reason, hes gone.
>>541073373
the "game plan" is absurd and retarded on its face, but then thats not an issue, you simply present the "game plan" as uncritically as possible, just accept its real, look they are telling you. Yeah, i can see their results, where is this "allotted criticism" from the right for to unironically win over the right to pro Pissrael with, can we see it?
>>
>>541073001
>but it's funny and only zionists are countersignaling it
Youre a leftist so I dont reslly agree with your analysis of what a zionist is.
>>
>>541069315
Yeah, the whole troon furry bf is pretty clearly an arrow pointing in that direction. The extreme left in general.

I'd be all for the government narrative if there weren't so many bizarre circumstantial pieces surrounding the timeline and the story the government gave just not matching up. Paving the site, etc.
>>
File: 1786755460347018.jpg (86 KB, 655x566)
86 KB JPG
>>541073377
The motive is clear, he was a threat to kikes and commanded the most important demographic, young gen z and millennials who were still partially or completely sympathetic to kikes among the right. That's not really a Tucker audience, hes more boomer and gen x, band thats why you're a kike why youre slime because you pretend its inconsequential that Pissrael biggest media person among the mainstream especially right and especially along millennials and gen z is inconsequential in turning their back on Pissrael, his biggest donor and the ones with the most invested and most to lose from all this, unless they can capture TPUSA. The motive is clear, kike.
>>
>>541073299
>And he was obviously a lot of investment on part of Pissrael, thanks for making my case why they had to kill him.
No youre going to have to explain it a lot better actually.
>you tried to claim spic fuentes had more appeal, greater reach, bigger audience
He did have a bigger audience literally, he had more live viewership on his personal show than Kirk by a large margin. This is not the same as having influence and reach, obviously Kirk had more reach because he was a controlled sellout thatliterally worked for Jews his entire life. Not maybe, literally. Your premise relies on the idea that jews are smart enough to seed right wing space with fake antisemitic influencers literal decades in advance (and then make them so popular that their viewership begins eclipsing their mainstream talking heads) but then stupid and irrational enough to then start assassinating their own mainstream guys on their payroll once those people start mildly dipping their toe in the rhetoric of the rising more popular fed infiltrator antisemite that they also control. Make it make sense please
>>
>>541073373
Yes, the right wing social media grift is also predominately meant to capture attention and waste time. Why would I not agree? I have never said any of my own beliefs, simply that anything mainstream is 100% inauthentic. Further, the people you referenced may say one thing in public, and another in private. Or, said otherwise, one thing for US, another for israel.
Why do you think I listen to any of them, be it Shapiro or Milo or Candace or Tucker or Destiny or Maher or etc.
>>
>>541073573
>the "game plan" is absurd and retarded on its face
Is it? You support Tucker Carlson do you not? He’s a pro-Israel CIA agent. Do ypu support JD Vance? Did you support Trump? You support Dan Bilzerian and all of those jews dont you? All of these people were and are being attacked and called antisemitic by jews. Trump is the goodest goy on earth and was disavowed by every jewish org you can name. Do you think JD Vance is /your guy/ because the jews dont like him? Obviously, the plan mapped out in that article is well under way and working. I mean, look at how you people talk about Kirk, the biggest sellout jew lover on earth: its basically screaming to the jews that if you have anyone drop even the smallest breadcrumb of Israel/jewish criticism you will throw your support behind them (except for Nick, who just so happens to be the only person that was saying any of this before the recent developments of this topic)
>>
>>541073951
>No youre going to have to explain it a lot better actually
Explain what? Clearly they are the ones who feel betrayed the most, how are you this retarded?
>He did have a bigger
No he didn't, see >>541072530
>This is not the same as having influence and reach, obviously Kirk had more reach because he was a controlled sellout thatliterally worked for Jews his entire life. Not maybe, literally.
More reach also means larger audience.
>Your premise relies on the idea that jews are smart enough to seed right wing space with fake antisemitic influencers literal decades in advance
He's a fed, spic fuentes is a fed informant kike.
>and then make them so popular that their viewership begins eclipsing their mainstream talking heads) but then stupid and irrational enough to then start assassinating their own mainstream guys on their payroll once those people start mildly dipping their toe in the rhetoric of the rising more popular fed infiltrator antisemite that they also control. Make it make sense please
Kikes aren't smart, they're using blackmail and entrapment and of course spic fuentes types to do so, and charlie was their biggest contender because of the audience he commanded and they killed him to capture his audience and company after he turned on them. Simple. Kike.
>>
>>541067304
kys SPLC faggot
>>
>>541067890
The nigger woman is a literal plant, she used to work for Ben Shapiro.
Piss off, already.
>>
>>541070015
> We totally knew about the attack
LOL, kike cope!
Every time kikes get caught with their pants down they pull shit like that.
>>
>>541074061
Youre here spending time to defend the narrative that you only know about or consider to be true because it was pushed aggressively by those influencers and pushed through the right wing internet ecosystem. The theory was started by Max Blumenthal (jew) and exists on the back of evidence provided by Candace Owens and the promotion of that material by people like Tucker Carlson and Joe Kent (CIA), and all the other jews I mentioned. All of this trickles down through RW media and ends up in your lap on /pol/ where you “independently” came to the conclusion that they created for you. Meanwhile my argument based on the NYT article is something I reas myself and was pushed nowhere on social media and was never mentioned once on /pol/. So you are a mega based hermit that knows everything is fake but you are spending your time trying to convince people that what these #1 influencers are saying is true. My investment in this topic comes from the fact that people like you register to me as weird and inauthentic, and I’m trying to understand it
>>
>>541074279
Kike the plan is absurd and you can't even be critical of it, instead you still want to deflect and pretend that "look jews are calling Tucker an antisemite because thats what jews want/@controlled opposition" and avoiding answering why its not absurd, on its face, the theory that kikes will "capture, taje over, and turn the young right into pro Pissrael, how? by "allowing" criticism of Pissrael by mainstream, by criticizing Pissrael, they'll win them to pro Pissrael.
>its basically screaming to the jews that if you have anyone drop even the smallest breadcrumb of Israel/jewish criticism you will throw your support behind them
Lol, lmao, lolololololololololololololol, yeah antisemitism is kewl, thats how everyone will be pro Pissrael, also unironically, i said he was killed because he turned on them, he was critical of Pissrael in various ways for years, he outright caller them out privately also as we know, all this is facts, but you're mad that i pointed that out and that makes me jump on his bandwagon, right, right, vie disgusting kike, i cannot point out discrepancy, motive, and facts, because that proves kikes are gonna win the young millennials and gen z on the right who absolutely hate, are critical of Pissrael, or even slightly dislike them, over, right?
>>
>>541074443
they did, no joke, they have various way this has been confirmed, much like 9/11. They did also let it happen, not realizing either that it would be successful, or, by outright incompetence the memo never got addressed, this is humans we're talking about, and especially genetically defunct kikes at that, various subhumans involved obviously.
>>
>>541074311
Wait you were actually using google ai as your argument not as a joke? I thought you were joking… especially since the numbers are so wrong (Fuentes gets 20-30k viewers a night currently, which is a significant drop from when Kirk was alive. During the first Iran bombing Nick was getting 40-80k live viewers, while Charlie had between 10-30k live viewers.
>More reach also means larger audience
No it doesnt. Ben Shapiro has more reach than Fuentes, but his audience is abyssmal.
>He's a fed, spic fuentes is a fed informant kike.
>Kikes aren't smart, they're using blackmail and entrapment and of course spic fuentes types to do so, and charlie was their biggest contender because of the audience he commanded and they killed him to capture his audience and company after he turned on them. Simple. Kike.
You restated your premise, I’m not sure how you think that responds to anything I said
>>
>>541074886
>they did, no joke,
Nope, it's their usual cope.
>>
>Even the best of goyim must be killed

They take their scripture very seriously.
>>
>>541074750
>the plan is absurd and you can't even be critical of it, instead you still want to deflect
Uh… what? You asked where it was happening and I gave examples. The point of the plan is that it keeps people critical of Israel under the influence of people who are pro Israel. They dont care whether joe schmoe goy is pro Israel or not as long as he votes for the pro Israel guy. All of those people I mentioned are either pro Israel or supporting someone who is pro Israel or pro-Jew (Blumenthal for example is an anti-Israel SPLC jew). You seem to think Nick Fuentes is a fake antisemite who was created to trick people that wake up to the jews, but extrapolating this concept to the “anti-Israel” people that literally work for the federal government that you follow, like Kirk, Tucker, Kent, etc is “absurd”. Explain
>>
>>541074958
>argument
kike im using it to pull up literal data, are you this transparent you're gonna pretend the data is hallucinated, and youre wrong on spic fuentes live views, kike.
>You restated your premise, I’m not sure how you think that responds to anything I said
You wanted me to "explain how jews are both so smart and dumb" you kike, i refused your false premise and stated the facts, motive and benefit they had for getting away with it
>The point of the plan is that it keeps people critical of Israel under the influence of people who are pro Israel.
Yeah, Cadence, Tucker, pro Pissrael, got it.
>>
File: 1786643304281498.jpg (98 KB, 874x1024)
98 KB JPG
>>541075097
Everyone knows bro, also like I said, it doesn't make kikes into any better or more competent, they are severely more incompetent having the data, and not doing anything, than not having it, they literally wasted all their intel, might as we never even tried.
>>
>>541075567
Tucker’s wife is Jewish. He regularly says he loves Israel and visits there often. Candace worked for the daily wire making millions of dollars. She is surrounded by Jews and regularly says Jews aren’t the problem is satanic Frankists or something. Also her husbands family and the person that introduced her to her husband are incredibly kiked.
I understand if you are not very clever you would probably register what owens and carlson are doing is fighting against the Jews. Tucker has been gatekeeping and gaslighting his audience for years pretending to be more racist and anti semetic than he really is to bring them under his influence.
>>
>>541075879
Yeah and Max is a Zionist. Got it kike.
>>
>>541075567
>kike im using it to pull up literal data
Anon… not only is the “data” just instantly verifiably wrong since we can just look at Fuentes’ stream and see that he gets at least 20k a night on the low-end, but you are literally shoveling out google search LLM responses as “data” and “evidence” and expecting me to think youre some redpilled noticer that is seeing throw the Matrix in order to know that Israel killed Kirk. This is actually the most revealing post of the thread. The Israel Kirk narrative appeals exactly to the type of person that would do this
>Yeah, Cadence, Tucker, pro Pissrael, got it.
Ok so when Tucker talks about how Israel is his favorite place in the world and always says things like “my friends in the Israeli governemt tell me” etc, thats all fine because its absurd to thinkjews would ever fund antisemitic rhetoric to trick people, but they are also doing exactly that with Nick Fuentes who is definitely Mossad cause he doesnt think they assassinated their top guy for no reason.
>>
>>541067304
Let me explain something to you. If someone says something in public to an audience it may be real or it may be performance. If someone says something in private it's real.
>>
>>541075922
You keep calling me a kike. Is anything I’m saying incorrect? You think tucker carlson who for decades worked for extremely Zionist Fox News or Candace owens who worked directly under Ben Shapiro aren’t pro Jewish?
What are you trying to say? Are you jewish?
>>
>>541075933
kike the data on how much, when kirk was alive, not now, spic Fuentes audience, viewership, following, was, is there, stop lying., and compare them honestly, kirk had easily 10-20x the audience, support, viewership, and reach.
>>541076084
theres a otto von Bismarck quote "nothing is confirmed until it's officially denied" I think also fits.
>so when Tucker talks about how Israel is his favorite place in the world and always says things like “my friends in the Israeli governemt tell me” etc, thats all fine because its absurd to thinkjews would ever fund antisemitic rhetoric to trick people, but they are also doing exactly that with Nick Fuentes who is definitely Mossad cause he doesnt think they assassinated their top guy for no reason.
First of all, i said he's a fed informant, fed, and in your theory, hes a freedom fighter, or what? I am going to expose how retarded you have been, and keep persisting in being, and will address Tucker liking the Country Pissrael, not its government, etc, after you answer that question.
>>
>>541076084
>If someone says something in private it's real.
In private meaning his texts to another famous influencer?
>>
>>541075933
Nick's explanation last night is the best I've heard it put. I'll sum it up as who benefits from the conspiracy? The left, who get away with killing us and destruction and violence to stop our policies from being enacted, which Tucker and his ilk extend the olive branch and make concessions. And it has also caused the destruction of TPUSA. As if we needed another indictment of Israel, but the left! This could have been casus belli to destroy them and force our agenda down their necks, and Trump just talked about his ballroom.
>>
>>541076127
"pro Jewish" kike, they are mainstream and we don't know if they'll not start questioning things like their religion especially, but now they are questioning the thing that normies and everyone else knows is the kike manifestation, Pissrael, and that both indirectly and very clearly also attacks kikes. And kikes know this, this is why Zionism is so us vs them with some 9 out if 10 kikes openly being for Pissrael, so going against this especially in the overton window, is important, why they had to kill him because he had a significant audience of people who were still sympathetic, while spic Fuentes has an audience who wouldn't even register to kikes as impactful.
>>
>>541076229
>kike the data on how much, when kirk was alive, not now, spic Fuentes audience
But Nicks biggest show ever was during the first Iran bombing which peaked at 90k. His viewership has actually declined since Kirk died since schizos want to hear someone blame Israel for everything. So nkt only is your “data” LLM screenshot wrong it is even more wrong than previously thought. Also not sure why you keep using the fact that Kirk was propped up by institutions as evidence that he was independent from them
>>
>>541076364
>As if we needed another indictment of Israel, but
lol
>>
>>541076229
And a lot of that audience are probably groypers now that Charlie is dead. Maybe Nick killed him!
>>
>>541076503
>His viewership has actually declined since Kirk died since schizos want to hear someone blame Israel for everything
Nick blames "the left" and "Russians" and "muslims" for everything.
It is literally the same thing but worse. It is neocon miggerism
>>
>>541076364
This makes sense but why is Tucker and the CIA kneecapping the right to save the left? What do they gain?
>>
>>541076364
>And it has also caused the destruction of TPUSA
So?
>>
>>541076548
>Nick blames "the left" and "Russians" and "muslims" for everything.
Idk anon, blaming the left for a leftist killer makes sense to me. But thanks for showing why you have a problem with him.
>>
>>541076503
Put up the real data then and compare the two, show the discrepancies, why don't you, already did more than you by preparing the information by searching for it. Also even the largest show, pales with the views Kirk pulled, he's doing millions bro. Spuc fuentes meanwhile is banned off everything.
>>
>>541076526
We've been living under Israeli occupation for at least 80 years, we don't need to make up conspiracies to indict them and absolve violent leftists.
>>
>>541076574
better question:
>First of all, i said he's a fed informant, fed, and in your theory, hes a freedom fighter, or what?
>>
>>541076645
He WANTS it to be a leftist killer but like many anons said, the narrative is bullshit.
He isn't calling it out because he wants to believe it
>>
>>541076715
yeah, it was a magic bullet and not a blatant cover up. O gee, not a coverup at all, just believe the narrative and don't question the inconsistencies.>>541072030
>>
File: jewish pedo defender.jpg (42 KB, 527x767)
42 KB JPG
>>541076364
>>541076574
Nick works for the same company as Mark Levin and is a pied piper agent who will do absolutely nothing to advance the right, and also never has. Tucker has woken tens of millions up to Israeli perfidy in the US government. Nick's claim to fame was that he defended Jeffrey Epstein.
>>
>>541067304
Kirk was getting too big, playing mediator too well, and had too much pull directly with Trump which made him a dangerous wildcard to them.
>>
>>541076574
Many possibilities. Limited hangout, keeping disaffected young males on the reservation, still an establishment neocon at heart, etc. I'm still not sure what his goal is, and I do like Tucker, but he is definitely playing a part.

>>541076609
It's going to backfire on them because most or all of those people on the campuses are going to start listening to people like Fuentes now that Kirk is gone.
>>
>>541067304
Yes, it’s the difference between an honest man and a dishonest one.
Charlie was honest and was turning on the jews right before they planned to launch the war on Iran. Unacceptable, so Trump approved his execution.
Fuentes is dishonest and a fed informant, so he’ll say whatever benefits him in the moment.
>>
>>541076816
Go to bed Candace.

>>541076838
What does Tucker propose? More capitulation and working across the aisle with these people who would shoot us in the neck. Tucker is playing a part. I hope I'm wrong, but I don't think I am.
>>
>>541076574
I think the CIA is legitimately asshurt that Israel is running foreign policy. Or at least, a faction of the CIA is.
>>
File: 1787110100860803.jpg (463 KB, 1080x1671)
463 KB JPG
>>541076838
noooo he's a freedom fighter, kikes, control everything and everyone bit nkt the leftist who they said killed kirk, noo, it really just fell right into their lapthat kirk was turning on his biggest donor and it happened to be them, and guess what, don't believe kike, spic Fuentes will back bibi, he didn't do it, it wasn't Pissrael.
>>
>>541076880
Lmao Trump literally didnt give a shit when he died. What pull? He was “getting too big” running the organization that they fund?
>>
File: 1787110301599615.jpg (67 KB, 719x480)
67 KB JPG
>>541077001
kike
>>
>>541074697
>bad thing happened
>thejewsdidit.png
Hardly needed Blumenthal to promote, I assure you.

Secondly, you assume I got the information on /pol/ or other places, when I never said as much. For all you know I was there and saw it happen.
Thirdly, and most laughably, is your attempt at establishing a MSM source as credible because... you read it there? You entirely failed to grasp my point in questioning why things are published at all.
>>
>>541073611
Anybody who serves jewish power that directly benefits the state of Israel. A cohesive GOP maintains the fake and jewish two party system and gives chabadniks massive power. Sorry I'm not a conservative like you faggots
>>
>>541076471
Ok I understand. It’s your contention that influencers like tucker and Candace being hyper critical of Israel is good for the zeitgeist and moving the Overton window. I can somewhat agree with this.
My problem is the contention that they are mainstream. While I would agree that they are more mainstream than Fuentes, the mainstream and the vast majority of the public view them as kooks. The idea that they and their crazy unsubstantiated views are the majority is a gross miscalculation. It certainly doesn’t help when tucker starts talking about remote viewing and ghosts or Candace talks about time travel.
It’s very easy to stereotype and throw away all Jewish and Israel criticism for the normie if they immediately associate it with someone like Candace owens. Compare this to the much more grounded, systematic and pragmatic approach of someone like Fuentes. He comes across as much more reasonable and educated on the topic. So far the only way to combat him has been mass censorship and accusations of controlled opposition and being a fed.
For both our sakes I hope your view of Carlson and owens is correct and that their long term strategy pays dividends. I have serious doubts, first about their true motives and second about the long term viability of the current Israel hysteria.
>>
>>541076975
>Charlie was honest
Charlie was literally one of the fakest most cynical grifters in all of politics. Everybody knew this before he died. His only appeal was to the same people that love those insanely evil looking Mega Church pastors- its dumb as fuck Americans that cant into reading people or understand grifting. It makes sense that people who love Kirk hate people like Nick, because when someone is authentic ans isnt cynically pandering to them it freaks them out. Its funny, one of Nick’s fakest most cynical performances was his first show after Kirk died where he waxed poetic about how amazing he was even though Nick knows better than anyone how much of a sellout lying scumbag Kirk was, but that show was his biggest most viewed show off all time and loved and shared amongst all the Kirk sychophants (before turning on Nick for not going schizo with them) because they absolutely LOVE being pandered and lied to.
>>
>>541077001
>What does Tucker propose?
A third party that is entirely nationalist. The rest of your jewish screeching is ignored.

>>541077098
I find it very VERY telling that spic fagweenies explicitly called people attacking Israel "low-IQ antisemites", which is verbatim the talking point employed by Hasbara and JIDF and Likud party members. Fuentes itself is a jewish last name.
>>
>>541077355
>mainstream than Fuentes, the mainstream and the vast majority of the public view them as kooks. The idea that they and their crazy unsubstantiated views are the majority is a gross miscalculation. It certainly doesn’t help when tucker starts talking about remote viewing and ghosts or Candace talks about time travel.
You're wrong on this like you're wrong on Kirks reach, and again, this is by the numbers.

>It’s very easy to stereotype and throw away all Jewish and Israel criticism for the normie if they immediately associate it with someone like Candace owens.
Normies are already overwhelmingly anti Pissrael see pic:>>541074750 and >>541073573
>Compare this to the much more grounded, systematic and pragmatic approach of someone like Fuentes. He comes across as much more reasonable and educated on the topic. So far the only way to combat him has been mass censorship and accusations of controlled opposition and being a fed.
Spic fuentes is now more mainstream and not less fringe than Cadence, got it.
>For both our sakes I hope your view of Carlson and owens is correct and that their long term strategy pays dividends. I have serious doubts, first about their true motives and second about the long term viability of the current Israel hysteria.
Are you also the kike who attacks Max Blumenthal as Zionist/Controlled Opposition?

You didn't answer my question btw, third time:
>First of all, i said he's a fed informant, fed, and in your theory, hes a freedom fighter, or what?

What is spicfuentes?
>>
>>541077295
This was a weak response. You dismiss my argument and dont engage with the premise because a jew in the media wrote about it for their liberal pro-Israel and largely audience, but when a Leftist Jew who is best friends with Tucker Carlson writes the first story about Israel killing Kirk, which was the basis of Candace and Tucker’s first videos on the subject which started the whole circus, that doesnt really matter because people blame jews for whatever anyway. Weird
>>
>>541077355
>mainstream than Fuentes, the mainstream and the vast majority of the public view them as kooks. The idea that they and their crazy unsubstantiated views are the majority is a gross miscalculation. It certainly doesn’t help when tucker starts talking about remote viewing and ghosts or Candace talks about time travel.
You're wrong on this like you're wrong on Kirks reach, and again, this is by the numbers.

>It’s very easy to stereotype and throw away all Jewish and Israel criticism for the normie if they immediately associate it with someone like Candace owens.
Normies are already overwhelmingly anti Pissrael see pic:>>541074750 and >>541073573
>Compare this to the much more grounded, systematic and pragmatic approach of someone like Fuentes. He comes across as much more reasonable and educated on the topic. So far the only way to combat him has been mass censorship and accusations of controlled opposition and being a fed.
Spic fuentes is now more mainstream and not less fringe than Cadence, got it.
>For both our sakes I hope your view of Carlson and owens is correct and that their long term strategy pays dividends. I have serious doubts, first about their true motives and second about the long term viability of the current Israel hysteria.
Are you also the kike who attacks Max Blumenthal as Zionist/Controlled Opposition?

Let me ask you this also:
>First of all, i said he's a fed informant, fed, and in your theory, hes a freedom fighter, or what?

What is spicfuentes in your theory?
>>
>>541077333
>Anybody who serves jewish power that directly benefits the state of Israel
Well the left serves jewish power, thats why Jews are leftists or liberals. They cant survive in a racially concious society that understands nations and history and ethnic identities and interests because they are highlighted and often persecuted. The left proposes a raceless, borderless world where Israel doesnt exist because its one of many “white” nations that need to go. The jew thrives in this world which is exactly why they turned every western country into this. Conservatives are also liberals. Social Liberalism is the basis of your ideology as a leftist. Thats why conservatives side with leftists against far right parties in Europe. Ultimately what matters for Jewish power is the survival of leftist ideology and liberalism and the diminishment of nationalism.
>>
>>541077724
>A third party that is entirely nationalist.
By “entirely nationalist” do you mean leftism with border control? Because thats exactly what he proposed in his 10 point manifesto. Are you a non white person living in a western country perhaps?
>>
File: FACTUAL.jpg (888 KB, 4444x4264)
888 KB JPG
>>541067304
>Charlie killed by a turbo white knight who made his troon princess sad
>Nick (natural contrarian) tired of literal retards hijacking /pol/ talking points after learning them a year ago and is trolling
Anything else is just retarded
>>
>>541077194
Please. The goodest of goys to the end.

>>541077724
What's a third party going to do besides make sure republicans never win another election? Fucking retard.
>>
I got confused and asked a different anon this, thinking it was you >>541077355
who's spic fuentes in your theory/opinion?Remember this:
>First of all, i said he's a fed informant, fed, and in your theory, hes a freedom fighter, or what? I
>>
>>541068540
old coots with last names like 'zinn' claim responsibility for crimes they didn't commit in order to run interference for muslim gunmen and furious furries ALL THE TIME
>>
>>541078261
Most of that is how Whites ended up where we are now. Believe the colorblind meritocracy while blacks and browns get diversity hired and lower college entrance criteria. Work hard and pay your taxes so it can all be given to foreign invaders. Be fair while somalis cheat your country out of billions and get away with it and your elected officials sell your country out to Israel. Nah senpai, I'm good on that.
>>
>>541078440
What would be the purpose of Nick Fuentes being a fed? Out of all the mainstream right wing political commentators he is the only one that calls out Jewish identity in general not just Israel and is explicitly pro white. He wants America to remain a white majority country and for there to be a immigration moratorium. Why would a federal agency want and continue to push those ideas?
>>
>>541078620
What was Zinn, a Mossad agent or radical leftist?
>>
File: 1787029688667277.jpg (112 KB, 537x1024)
112 KB JPG
>>541078620
>>
>>541078760
well the premise is first that kikes control everyone, so everyone allowed a platform, is by default compromised already, and thats the point, second, if its not obvious why and how he's a fed informant: honeypot, also especially because he attacks Jewish identity, and not Pissrael he is immediately considered illegitimate and not worth platforming, and this working in tandem because obviously he couldn't say that in mainstream and not be a target of a kike or kike simp, but him being in the fringe plays perfectly into building an audience of cretinous antisemites which can always be trivialy dismissed and have zero chances to even be considered, and that's by design.
>>
>>541077355
>My problem is the contention that they are mainstream.
Tucker was on Fox News for years if not decades. He is absolutely mainstream, he doesn't just dip from the public consciousness just because he quit or was fired or whatever.

>>541077887
I dismissed your argument because it was built upon a faulty premise. You asserted I came to this information on /pol/ or other right-wing grifting talking heads or social media. I did not. There's nothing more to engage with.

To your media tidbit, one jew side is pro-israel to get concessions for israel, and one jew side is limited anti-israel fomenting to ratchet up the genetic jewish paranoia and corral jewish sentiment for israel. They work in tandem, not against each other.
It is not left-wing jews and right-wing jews, but the jews' left hand and right hand, part of the same being.
>>
>>541079629
>You asserted I came to this information on /pol/ or other right-wing grifting talking heads or social media. I did not. There's nothing more to engage with.
But the evidence for your argument comes from them. So its actually even worse, you base your opinions off the excrement that leaks from their table, you dont even know who youre feeding off of
>>
File: 1736032305050919.jpg (34 KB, 720x579)
34 KB JPG
>>541067304
>Nicholas "El Marrano Sefardí" Fuentes
>>
>>541080170
Not turning on the vpn makes this better
>>
File: 1778992159913111.png (1.08 MB, 1024x1024)
1.08 MB PNG
>>541080260
Kys kike.
>>
>>541080059
yeah kike cadence is making false reports to the white house and Tulsi Gabbards National Intelligence community and neither are charging her with the criminal liability that making such fraudulent and false reports obviously carries, because why not, she can just get away with it, right?
>>
File: 1757842006544509.jpg (192 KB, 863x1024)
192 KB JPG
Charlie Kirk was a human sacrifice meant to start a Civil War in the USA and enable a WW3 starting in Iran. The Ziokikes and the Freemasons overplayed their hand so everyone caught on immediately.
>>
>>541080463
>yeah kike cadence is making false reports to the white house and Tulsi Gabbards National Intelligence community and neither are charging her with the criminal liability
Say that again but slower. I like that you dropped the gimmick of being some schizo unibomber hermit though. Defend mommy
>>
>>541080545
>gimik
what are you talking about 1pbtid, also not contesting what I said, how brave of you.
>>
>>541067526
FPBP
>>
>>541080463
Second year in a row they picked a DEI winner. I tried so fucken hard.
>>
File: 1786941074696944.png (117 KB, 621x541)
117 KB PNG
>>541080537
bibi had the craziest reaction, before anyone said anything about Pissrael being included, he had to personally assure everyone that Pissrael had nothing to do with it.
>>
>>541080059
>information can only come from the MSM!
Weak. There's nothing further worth discussing with you.
>>
File: 1787069676989090.jpg (141 KB, 1080x1174)
141 KB JPG
>>541080866
yeah, she certainly had contenders, huh?
>>
>>541080724
Contest what? That Candace is controlled opposition?
>>541081051
He was responding to a reporter that asked him about Candace’s videos which had at that pointed reahced over 100mil views in total blaming Israel for the killing. Why should I care about the take of somebody whos so badly researched on his own theory? How much would you say your ultra based independent research is just following grifters on twitter?
>>
>>541081165
>glowfag is trying to tell me that repeating Tucker Carlson, Max Blumenthal, and Candace Owens makes you a redpilled noticer thats fighting the system
You glow
>>
>>541076503
People were wonder about whether Charlie was going to be the next one to flip on Israel before he died, and enough people were openly joking about Israel taking him out so much that the prime minister of Israel had to go out and flat out say on twitter "We were not responsible for this" right after the murder happened to get in front of the rumors.
And yeah, Trump clearly gave no two shits about the murder. There was never even any investigation into the trannies on twitter who knew about the plan to kill Charlie ahead of time. None of it was deemed worth looking into, or worthy of an explanation to the public.
>>
File: IMG_20260819_210905.jpg (56 KB, 1066x272)
56 KB JPG
>>541081328
>>541081328
he literally said that the day of the assassination or the very next day kike, lol, how retarded are you? Nobody had made a video saying Pissrael had done it, lol.
>Contest what? That Candace is controlled opposition?
kike.
>>541081389
>You glow
Yeah, calling out Pissrael is what kikes always wanted, kke, so blatantly transparent.
>>
File: 1787073604129233.jpg (140 KB, 828x977)
140 KB JPG
kiked ai lies, bibi denied it at least once more times between the first time which was a day afterthe assassination, and denied it on video, out of the blue, and then the 18th occasion, the other one occasion was in another interview and if i remember correctly there was another written one ALL 4 or so also directly from bibi, 2 or 3 before cadence made one video saying that. So kike, you literally invented and inverted the entire event to pretending that cadence is the brainchild when its bibi, and you defend and promoted this lie like a vile kike no joke LYING TO MY FACE AND EVERYONE ELSE THAT IT WAS CANDENCE, NOT BIBI, VILE DISGUSTING KIKE, that said Pissrael was behind it, and you want to talk about cadence being controlled opposition as you unironically defend bibi and inverted reality to attack her, vile disgusting kike faggot?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.