[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1779208112201012.jpg (55 KB, 771x1024)
55 KB JPG
Why don't we nurture and value intelligence?
Why don't we segregate the stupids from society?
The stupids cling to race and nationality and economics and dozens of other things to secure an individual identity for themselves that's still attached to a group of people that can make the world seem more accepting, but the ONLY factor that matters is intelligence. We ignore it. We find reasons not to look at intelligence, not to use it as a gatekeeper for success. Too often, ruthlessness is the only factor that matters, and the ruthless win, and the stupids cheer, because they can't see that idolizing the one that rose up only exemplifies the characteristics that got them there, which isn't intelligence, but evil.
My IQ was tested as a kid, and it came out at 132. I feel stupid, but I can tell that 95% of the world is stupider. For everyone saying that intelligence isn't important, you may as well pull your dick out and issue further challenges. We can tell you're stupid.
>>
>>541097871
>Why don't we nurture and value intelligence?
>Why don't we segregate the stupids from society?
Smarter people than you have answered these questions.
>>
File: AI-apocalypse.q.jpg (586 KB, 920x2873)
586 KB JPG
>>541097871
>Why don't we nurture and value intelligence?
intelligence is now a commodity thanks to AI
human intelligence is obsolete and irrelevant
humans are obsolete and irrelevant
>>
>>541097938
Oddly, your post is devoid of an answer. Can you explain?
>>
>>541097871
>My IQ was tested as a kid, and it came out at 132.
were you then nurtured and encouraged or what?
or did you end up hanging out with the stoners smoking weed between classes
>>
File: 1780600235900042.png (217 KB, 749x669)
217 KB PNG
>>541097871
Because nurturing intelligence is racist.
>>
>>541098098
I was tested due to a learning disability. My intelligence could not be nurtured. I liked what I liked and disregarded the rest. I never did homework. I had shop classes mixed with human anatomy and other sciences, but I barely graduated. School was a pissing contest for kids, not education. It's an animal cage for pecking order, and might makes right in school. That's literally the message we get. I don't know if most realize it. I could always tell it was utter horseshit, but I couldn't put it into context then, either. It's training for a life of slavery and repetition and schedules. not intelligence. Almost no one is actually encouraged.
I didn't enjoy weed or anything at all until I was in my mid 30s.
>>
>>541098025
I'm not sure I agree with this.
AI isn't the supreme being we think it is. It can improve, certainly, but it doesn't make ingenuity obsolete. It has to have a basis of knowledge to calculate deductions from, and it's only as good as the accumulated human knowledge it has access to.

I'd like to see an AI get hold of old spell books and that jew one, too. I want to see an AI make spells that also don't do anything. I wonder if an AI can be disappointed by the outcome.
>>
>>541098148
This narrative needs to be fought.

I know people who don't want to know their IQs because they're worried it might be low.
>>
>>541097871
Short answer: The people in charge want a dumb population because it's easier to control.
>>
>>541098490
But smart people are still out there. Even in the 'hood, there are niggers sitting at home wondering why they're in the lion's cage, not out contemplating things with the primates.

How do we organize intelligence without being a target for "intelligence" agencies?
>>
This thread is uninteresting to bots and Indians, apprently. I'm not overtly insulting the filthy jews and the Indians don't want to debate a subject they're devoid of.
>>
>>541097871
My IQ is 70 but my actual genetic ceiling is like 95-105 comparing my family, I fucked up badly
>>
>>541098284
if you were tested for an ld, the test used most likely maxed out at around 135 or 140. these tests are much more accurate in the meaty part of the curve, and less accurate towards the extremes. so if you scored that high, your real iq is probably higher than 132, since you can only be a theoretical 140 or so due to the design of the test.
idk my number, all i was told was i was in the 99th percentile, and like you feel like a retard most of the time.
you might like checking out some john talyor gatto, if you haven't already. the purpose of public schooling was expressly to create a population that would tolerate working monotonous jobs, like on assembly lines, as most people hated that work. ford could only keep people about 10 days, despite offering some of the highest wages in the country, they called them "10 day men" because they got sick of the mindless repetition.
https://youtu.be/8_5h0aO8ZaE
this guy did all the research, and lays it out all in their own words, how the industrialists wanted to create a similar system to the prussian school system which created obedient human automatons with crab in the bucket traits.
it's also very unnatural to only be around children of your own age. in primitive societies, the young kids learn from the older ones, and nobody is in competition to see who has better grades. this stunts people and gears them towards a life of horizontally directed violence and norm-enforcement.
>>
File: alleles.png (76 KB, 1120x2499)
76 KB PNG
>>541097871
>The stupids cling to race
If you don't understand that intelligence is tied to genetics and race then you are not intelligent
You are stupid
>>
Stoopid people aka mases always want to lunch the intelligent.

That being said, no greater danger is posed to an intelligent person than another intelligent person, especially if the idiots are out of the way.

Keeping intelligent people busy is more important than keeping mases busy.

There is several ways to do that, one is have them control the mases by participating in the system of Balanced management and modifications as required. Including modification of reward and consecunces, aplropate use of force and so on... another way is giving them neet bux, let them do their hobbie shit and not cause havoc.

I think.

Ffs I can't tell what's more dangerous for all groups and sides, the mases or the intelligent idiots without breaks. They all sicken me, annoy me and I am repulsed by everyone.
>>
>>541099540
>I am repulsed by everyone.
this is really the only sane standpoint one could take
if it matters, high iq people are far less likely to be corrupt. you get a lot of naive, well meaning high iq people that erroneously think everyone else sees the world like they do, in a cooperative, collaborative way.
corruption, criminality and personality disorders correlate very well with low iq. the hannibal lecter archetypes are rare, almost all psychopaths and aspds are fucking retarded and don't learn from mistakes, and in primitive societies were killed as soon as they were detected.
>>
File: feeling.jpg (9 KB, 235x217)
9 KB JPG
>>541097871
>>
>>541097871
>My IQ was tested as a kid, and it came out at 132.
>I feel stupid, but I can tell that 95% of the world is stupider.
that checks out, as in, 130ish is upper 5%-percentile

>Why don't we nurture and value intelligence?
(((they))) thought they needed more dumb-dumbs, because they are greedy and drunk for power
they never stopped to think it'll bite them in their own ass



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.