Gravity is electrons wanting to go to protons, effectivly. Magnetism is this occuring but the atoms are directed in mostly the same way so it's stronger. Strong force is the inner electron of a Neutron going into an adjacant Proton.Here's my cirno-9-baka "science paper"It contains no math.Nor science.It's all from the shower and dreams.https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/524539377/ https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/524657141/ https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/524766314/ https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/525050418/ https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/525145342/ https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/525275898/
magnetism and gravity aren't the same thing you stupid nigger, gravity works in empty space
>here's new physics with no math Ah sweet! A schizo post!
>>541135002build me iron man armor you lazy nigger and make it shoot dick shaped lasers that do double damage to niggers
>>541135002>It contains no math. Nor science.many people characterize themselves as being "scientists" nowadays.Only those who always carefully follow the scientific method are deserving of that title.Scientists are distinguishable from artists, poets, musicians, and others in that they use what is known as the "scientific/empirical method".It is not that "inspiration" or "the muse" is not valuable in science, it is but it is not the starting point of what we call science.a true scientist will:>observe nature and carefully record what is seen.>seek patterns in the observed data, put numbers on the data, fit equations to those numbers.>generalize those equations into a word description of the process - this is a hypothesis.>carry out experiments and/or gather independent data to see how well the hypothesis predicts future observations and results. This is called "closing the loop" on your hypothesis.>reject, or modify the hypothesis if the experiments show it falls short of success in these predictions.>only after the results of several experiments have been successfully predicted by the hypothesis, can it be called a theory.If two different theories predict a given phenomenon equally well, the simpler theory is probably the best one.this principle is called Occams Razor.theories can never be proven to be correct, some other mechanism entirely may be the cause of the observed data.but theories can be disproved if they fail to predict the outcomes of additional experiments.such theories are termed to be falsified.
>>541136853He thinks though, thefore we are
nigga gravity is just going straight in curved spacetime. 9th grade physics baka
>>541137818>He thinksI wouldnt call that thinking and hes making many retarded mistakes.
>>541135002THIS IS TRUE.
>>541138476nigger how?Its like watching someone try to explain how an iPhone works by saying "The pixels just really want to turn red!"
>>541135002>mirage of dissent
>>541135002You again? Fuck of with your>It contains no math.Also,>Magnetism is this occurringWe know what magnetism is. It follows naturally from accounting for relativistic effects on moving charges, and entirely separately from quantization of angular momentum (which is something observed experimentally).
>>541135002Anon this is the electromagnetic force