>USAID ends>all the Star Trek movies and shows are canceled
>>541143598
Gene Roddenberry was star trek. The horse shit that came after is Jewish Bolshevik Zionist Agitprop for Sabbath Shabbos dalits and infidels.
>>541143672Gene roddenberry was a child molesting freak.
Who the fuck watches star trek anymore? Its the Saturday Night Live of scifi
>>541143753correct
Crazy eh?
>>541143598Star Trek Brave New Worlds literally just aired a new episode today.
>>541144011Nobody watches that crap.
>>541143598I don't think I'd care about woke or dei if they would simply put absolute bombshell goddess nigger babes with huge tits in front of my face. It's never babes... it's always ugly ass subhumans. They do this shit on purpose. Fucking jews
>>541144053Almost everyone I know watches it, including me unfortunately.
>>541143935
>>541143753this
>>541144137I took one sniff of STD and kicked all subsequent nutrek into the trash>>541144158Those are things that happened, Obama did beat Jack Ryan after he dropped out. Nothing schizo there anon.
I'm ACTING
>>541143598>put a guy in charge of star trek who actively hates star trekwhy
>>541143753Remember when he did an interview and unprompted went off on some tangent about his underaged daughters in nice clothes showing their panties and how thrilling he found it.
>>541143753>Gene roddenberry was a child molesting freak.SOURCE? Because Gene:Fucked Uhura Fucked & Married MajelRaped Grace Lee Whitney (allegedly)He wanted hair on his pie.
>>541144137>Almost everyone I know watches it, including me unfortunately.During your dilation parties? Figures.
>>541144306That's the only one I haven't seen because the captain is a woman nigger, never gonna watch it either.
>>541144447>I can't stop thinking about trannies dilating That's on you.
Female Jem'hadar
>>541143935don't tell /trek/ this... lol. warpcore breach if true.
>>541144624>huehuehue/trek/ has known this for decades, retard
>>541144624Oh anon, they know.
>>541144395She didn't say which executive at desilu assaulted her
>>541145126>She didn't say which executive at desilu assaulted herExcept she did, off the record. She was extensively interviewed before her death, told the author off the record, the author told me personally, so since I didn't hear it directly from her and he never published it per her wishes, I say allegedly.If you REALLY want to think she never said "who" to a single soul through all the years of being constantly asked, well, that's on you.
>>541145126>>541145341https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMa1v7ii5P0&t=3600s1 hour in. its all you need to see to know gene was a pedo freak. Separate the art from the artist and all that..... but i really can't
>>541143672No doubt star trek is worse, but even early trek is woke as hell, ToS had the first interracial kiss on television
>>541145491>1 hour in.Yeah, gonna need a timestamp on that before I waste my time. It would not surprise me if he was, but I've never heard he was.>Separate the art from the artist and all that..... but i really can'tGene was the worst part of Trek. Not all of us bought into the faggotry of them trying to deify him and calling him the "Great Bird of the Galaxy". I knew from near the start of my time with Trek he was a sex pest. They pretty much all are with rare exceptions.
>>541145528>ToS had the first interracial kiss on televisionWHOA REALLY?No shit reddit!
>>541145691Exactly at 1 hour in as I said. Time stamp is in the link.>little girls are such sweet smelling delicious thingsthen he goes on to talk about how much he enjoyed looking at his daughters panties when they bent over. His trek was the only reason TNG and DS9 were any good though. Excellent world builder. Actually had a vision for the IP. Then it was subverted after his death (starting in TNG DS9 and the rest honestly)
>>541145811>His trek was the only reason TNG and DS9 were any good though.Due to the work of others like Gene L Coon, DC Fontana, etc, etc. He pitched a show and got better talent to work on it, then rewrote everyone and pissed off a lot of people. There's a reason he never had much success outside of Star Trek. His late 70's attempts at new pilots were always pure ass.
>>541143935erm what the sigma
>>541145921>he pissed people offGOOD! Yeah he refused to allow his vision to be diluted. Wish more people were like that who controled these IPs. Yeah "working with other people" is the definition of showrunning. I never claimed he wrote every line, built every set, acted every part, and played all the music. I want these IP controllers to hold the line then hire more talented people.
>>541146007>GOOD! Yeah he refused to allow his vision to be diluted.Ah, so you're retarded and don't know what you're talking about. What a faggot!
>>541146112What did he fold on, in regards to the core ideas of the IP, while he was alive?
>>541145811he appears to be on drugs. Rx, recreational or both.
>>541146183I don't disagree. Or dementia. I don't think he was lying though.
>>541146234he had probably seen some messed up stuff during the war too.
>>541143598Literally everything is gay and retarded. OP is gay & retarded. Woke star wars is hyper genocide white supremacy inducing levels of gay & retarded. Dissolving soft power is gay & retarded.I am gay & retarded. Anyone gay & retarded enough to respond to this thread and specifically this post is gay & retarded.
>>541146355oh for sure. To make an entire series about a perfect navy, that loved science, were the crew had no interpersonal conflicts.
>>541144353She needs to get lynched tho for real
>>541144518Female jam haters are impossible and both these paid bolshevik shills need get raped to death
>>541146001Welcome to the grindhousehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FP0LhnnVFtM
>>541143598They were cancelled because they were all massive commercial failures. Picard was basically unwatachable, had huge continuity errors with all the previous shows, really basic stuff like talking about currency in a post-money world. One executive is responsible for dumpstering the franchise and that person is Alex Kurtzman
>>541143598https://youtube.com/shorts/BMsIcmi2yOQ
>>541147183these are all just the same youtube and social media talking points. what OP is implying is that the US GOV through US AID propped up all the nu-trek stuff financially. which if you read thru the lines, isn't far fetched.
>>541147296It is because all those shows were closing down before the USAID shit got cut. Thats why they filmed the seasons back to back. Less than 50k people were watching nutrek academy....and half of those were youtube critics.
>>541147296Of course its far fetched. Did you actually watch anything by Alex Kurzman? It's basically a flaming binfire of bullshit. I'm pretty left-wing and even I found it utterly insufferable, pandering bullshit. And the worst part was not even the extremely clumsy politics inserted into everything, it was that it was so poorly researched and incompatible with all the previous show lore. And the writers were so unprofessional, they didn't even care. The writers they hired were from CW shows like Supernatural, unbelievably inappropriate writer choices. All the old writers 2000s and earlier were from the sci-fi world, which is as it should be.
>>541147413CW did it better. If you are going to shit out terrible shows....at least do 25 episode seasons
>>541145528Aliens using mind control had to force kirk to kiss uhura. kek
>>541147525Exactly, 10 episode seasons are the height of laziness and the cherry on the shit sundae of low-effort writing
>>541145921>>541146007>two bots arguing with each otherinternet really is dead
>>541147607Proper punctuation and caps = bot. The West has truly fallen.
The nepotistic media industry's writers are actually quite proud about how they're destroying everything that came before. This is because they're all narcissistic Maoist trannies whose only purpose on Earth is to corrupt and destroy.
>>541147960A lot of it is just a superiority complex. "Yeah WE can understand and appreciate nuance but the modern audience just can't." Lindeloff, Nolan, the trek writers have all said this. They don't believe the audience will accept a hero unless he is flawed and unlikeable....because the 'modern audience' is flawed and unlikeable.
>>541143753based
>>541147960>>541148081It's partly Marxism but also, they want to make their mark. But it's mostly Marxism.
>>541147734You'd be a shitty bot if you didn't try to pass the bare minimum literacy test, do better jeet "coders"
>>541148148The pinkos of yesteryear could put together an entertaining circus though. So it can't be mostly marxism. Its not like hollywood was ever based. Its entire existence is due to jews not wanting to pay edison who had very strict moral rules on what he allowed to be filmed
>>541143598>USA was telling the aliens that we respect and love them the whole time and no one knewSo this is proof of aliens being here or nearby and that spacex is being used to dull external alien communications reaching Earth.
>>541148238>he pinkos of yesteryear could put together an entertaining circus though. So it can't be mostly marxism.Writer's strike killed off Hollywood for real.>>541148241Aliens = demons, get with the times.
>>541143672Gene roddenberry was a supreme kike. And actually bad. He was the reason the first couple of seasons of tng were so retarded. I can only assume that someone else was dictating TOS, although it was woke kikery too, or he just had more mercury in his brain 20 years later.
>>541148269>Writer's strike killed off Hollywood for real.it was dead before that. My father watched a movie in theaters every weekend since the 80s, stopped around 2012. Said fuck hollywood, they aren't getting a cent from me. It was his boomer breaking point. I take your point though. I think Gen-AI will break the industry completely in the next 5 years.
>>541148368No no I mean the first big writers strike around, late '90s or early '00s? All the good writers either retired or got blacklisted by Hollywood. And they're already moving toward using AI big time in Hollywood, it's going to just make everything gayer tho.
>>541145491what the actual fuckI guess all of Hollywood really is nonces?
>>541148443Ah okay. That definitely killed TV. That first strike also made them bring in fresh talent, and not allow writers to have too many big hits. That following era had studios buying long long options on scripts and just sitting on them. So the old guard was fat and happy, but few projects actually made it to screen. Yes AI is being used by hollywood (basically all animation and cgi houses have CGI somewhere in their workflows rn, and a ton of concept art is genAI in the big studios), but AI will allow normal talented storytellers to make high quality niche content for normal people.Video killed the radio star. Internet killed the movie star. AI will kill established studios.
>>541148539always has been
>>541148697it's just so disgusting, I feel dirty for ever having watched american movies and tv
>>541148682I think it's more likely that AI will auto-generate slop for people based on their profiles, but it's so terribly expensive that it will cost too much money for most. AI films will happen, TV shows, but I don't think people will show much interest. Hollywood dying might be a permanent thing as people give up curated stories for more interactive content, that started ages ago and by 2005 or so, video gaming was bigger than TV+movies put together.
>>541148763>it's so terribly expensive tokens will be subsized for the next decade. If its less than $20k to generate a movie, thats cheaper than most indie movies (even documentaries) are today. So less than 6 figures should be your benchmark with cost.Also they will burning trained models onto cards. That alone will make it 100x cheaper. And you should be able to buy a pci card to locally generate for about what a GPU costs. Already GTP 3 equivalent models have been burned onto PCI cards. Again "Less than $5k" should be the benchmark, as thats what a decent camera, lens and microphone would cost an indie filmmaker. Most everything that will be generated will be total shit. But most movies and tv shows ever made were total shit. Go back and watch a night of television (use tv guide) from 1970, or watch every movie out on a certain weekend in 1950. Odds are they all will blow. >People will want interactive contentstrong disagree. People want to zonk out and be entertained. They also want to be part of these cultural events, FOMO. Those will keep happening.
>>541148937This is nothing new though. Kubrick and shining. The Thing. There are so many examples. What is new is that basically everything sucks, there are so very few gems.
The President of Earth started an NGO to save the planet by buying poor people brand new energy efficient appliances. Thank her
>>541148979>tokens will be subsized for the next decade.lol they already ran out of money and the investors have cold feet, government too, but I realize tech advances will make things less hungryI just don't think the technology is going to result in better entertainment, I could be wrong. But I don't fascinate myself with AI at all or use it. Many people dislike it, heck in Japan 90% of people say they won't use it.
>>541143648This looks like the exact same room of that picture passed out with the beer bottles all around him. I like this guy more. I will buy him sheets, pillows and a blanket if someone links me his Amazon Wishlist, lol.
>>541149041the sidelined 'based' (or even just normal) writers will be able to realize their stories. We will always have people with a desire to tell stories, right now there are gatekeepers on which stories get realized. Soon, not so much. We will have "good enough" artificial productions pretty soon.
>>541149136I will remain skeptical but the death of Hollywood can only be described as a good thing.
>>541144353The level of hate I feel when looking something like this is unreal...
>>541144518I always said it but that lesbian look like a dried child.
>>541148682>AI will kill established studios.To be fair, it was the studios and unions that did most of the killing.
