When you look at art made during the Christian era, you kinda get the impression that artists tried to tell a story about a cult which uses pedophilia and blackmail to enforce race mixing.Look at this painting. There's a black, naked child behind Venus. She's about to kill the god of war Mars. This guy looks like someone who'd protect your country.I will just post some art in this thread. May make you consider what artists back then knew and that what is happening today might had been long in the planning.
This painting here is "The rape of Ganymede" by Rembrandt.100 years earlier Pope Julius III was accused of banging a street boy others nicknamed Ganymede. It was a widely known scandal at that time.Also: this strongly suggests that other Christians, say including prude christian women - knew that young boys had an appeal to some men. Yet they still didn't mind those boys portrayed nude for as long as there were 2 little angel wings.
Here's a painting with a white woman who looks as if she just had sex - surrounded by a bunch of black boys.Based on everything you were told about Christians and the Christian ere - doesn't this go contrary to it? This feels like a modern day advertisement or Netflix, no? - Actually since they are underage, it'd be a scandal today.
Here's one with a Satyr entering a scene of Cupid and Venus.Cupids ass is featured very prominently. And it doesn't look like the ass of a male infant - it looks like the plump ass of an adult woman. ...You think women knew? And other Christians knew? I mean when Christians depict Adam and Eve, they make those paintings as little erotic as possible. They make them look like biology books. Despite them being naked adults, and despite them having populated earth and thus bred like rabbits.
Did Christian women know? Look at this drawing, and is there any way they didn't? Think about this drawing was made and came to be - In a time ere pornography.You can see she's sitting on her clothing. Did she undress first, and then undress the boy? Or did she undress the boy first, and then herself? Was she aware being spanked while an artist was present who's taking it all in <- that it would likely be more embarrassing for the boy? Odds are she or the artist were spanked as children.The artist approaching her: was he just like: i want to draw you spanking your very young child. And could you be naked? Both of you? And she was just like... yeah totally?The Artist likely drew women in school, during anatomy studies. I bet the women were nude but told to only pose certain ways to not make it too sensual. Why?Women must be hyper-aware how men react to a naked butt. Adult women who had children know how a man reacted to the very first time they exposed their buttocks to them.Women have a sexuality too. Today the read a lot of dark erotica... just saying.She knew this drawing could turn into a painting hanging somewhere? That without internet pornography, the times you can see naked butts was rare? You likely consume a lot of porn - because you get bored of old porn. A freshly exposed ass is always special.Christians act like they blush at sex and barely know how it works, but this was made by adults.If she was aware an ass exposed like this could arouse interest in pedophile men - well she knew her boy doesn't have a cunt.Christian morality at it's peak enforced sodomy laws, young men could go to jail for receiving a blowjob. - but this was a-ok? And everyone pretended it wasn't what it was?
I think this thread was anchored?I know it's not recent... but seems directly related to what is happening today.
>>541149857Nevermind, i just don't know when threads get pushed and when not.
It's also worth noting: If you say look at Art of Indian sex temples (they are filled to the brim with erotic sculptures) - you will not easily find children on them. And if you find any children, not in a sexual manner. I couldn't spot any at all. India was later ruled by muslims for 600 years, in some islamic countries you can legally marry 9 year olds.India used to be the first country to have widespread flushing toilets worldwide (no, for real) and they had dentistry 1000 years ere denmark. They used to be very advanced compared to other countries. After 600 years of islamic rule, they struggled to keep toilets going.
>>541150061Dude
So? Most art from way back in the day is fucked up
>>541150061And there is something i find interesting: Habibi doesn't create.Like: you look at Japan, it's exporting stories all around the world. You know them as anime. It's a tiny island on the far eastern edge of the world, but you know their fictional characters. You heard of Hello Kitty, just like you heard of Garfield or the grinning cat from europe. But i can't think of an equivalent from Habibi's countries. Despite a depiction of a cat not being against any religious rules or culture i bet. Muslims outnumber the japanese by like what? 1000 : 1 or so? Yet you know Son Goku and likely not fictional characters made in islamic countries.Why this matters? Because in some islamic countries you can legally 9 year olds. Yet they are prude.I increasingly get the impression that the combination of prudeness and pedophilia leads to a decline. Despite these very people telling everyone otherwise. By the way: whites were peak when Christianity was new. When their pagan history wasn't that far off in the past. It feels like it's been a decline since.And this decline can be massive!!!! In india recently 600 million people shat in the street, even after their government provided toilets.
>>541150201Your just jumping from topic to topic like a crackhead.
>>541150183Yes. But the race mixing is odd, no?Like - you can see plenty of sob stories in Hollywood about how we used to treat black people. Then you open a feminist art history book, and it's a woman seemingly having sex with 4 underage black boys. - that is weird as fuck, no?
>>541150338i'm not seeing what your seeing like what black, all three figures are italian in the first image
There is also a lot of art of women being sadistic towards children.I have a personal theory: women tempted men with additional children. Basically: if you join our secret religion / cult, we will let you breed some cult members and you can have more children than a single wife can provide you.And some of these women were witches: if a count or king lured in like this didn't do what these women wanted, they abused these children. Killed them. That's why we have stories of witches boiling children alive. (could something similar happen with jeffrey epstein island? Catholic schools known for abuse?)And that's why some men got so angry, they then began to burn some of these women in public. They gathered wood, they knew that in a medieval town with flammable houses the smell of fire would attract crowds. Ever smelled a eastern bonfire from miles away? And the screams too. The screams and smell of fire must've attracted huge crowds. They were so angry, they wanted everyone to see what happens to these sorta women.
>>541150542oh so we're doing an alt history thingyeah alright, but a heads up in the op would have got things going better
>>541150600Is it alt history? Witches had a reputation for being cruel towards children. For being unpleasant. That is history, not alt history. I'm just providing a rational explanation.It makes no sense to kill and harm your own offspring, right? But... what if that's indeed a way to blackmail someone who wanted more children than a single wife could provide? It'd be cruel yet fairly rational behavior then.The closest equivalent today would be women on Twitter bitching that raising their own children is unpaid labor. - but witches back then were known for killing children.And maybe something like this happens today.Sorta like: you don't do the feminism or religious thing i want you to do, your child will find a new stepdad: >>541149466Or he will turn out to be transsexual. Lots of rich people with children who transition, despite this being very rare. Despite that these boys must have easy access to dating women. More so than regular boys.
By the way: i challenge you to find a painting of a brothel during the Christian Era which looks more sensual than they painted children.In paintings of brothels, the whores look like modest, chaste and proper Christians. Wearing fancy clothes, aristocratic clothes, multiple layers of clothes. Ok you heard conspiracy theories about how say Disney is trying to condition children towards a sexuality? Compare christian era art of brothels to the way they painted women and children - consider they had no access to internet porn. Does that feel like conditioning? Well, if your society is run by a blackmail cult, of course they'd want to instill fetishes in you with which they can blackmail you.And that would also explain why they are prude yet paint all this sensual stuff. It's not blackmail if it isn't a taboo.
The Church and its artisans were disproportionately gay. The Globo is always Homo
>>541150971True.And: if it's blackmail, they can only blackmail you with things which are taboo. They must tempt you (thus they create art tempting you) - but then they must shame you for desiring it. And they pretend it isn't what it obviously is.And if this is sorta run by women (it would explain why male genital mutilation is rampant if religious blackmail cults are run by female supremacists) - well, i think they consider it funny if boys are banged. Makes them feel superior.I think as we cease to be religious, you can see some similarities to liberal women today. They will be angry if you say wife should give you a daily blowjob - consent, autonomy, women rights. But they will dress up their boy like a girl knowing this will attract adult men. And they know he doesn't have a vagina. At the peak of sodomy laws, they sent young men to prison for receiving a blowjob. You can see that some liberal women would happily establish making heterosexual blowjobs illegal (or make the legality depend on the mood of the woman...) while encouraging gay sex.
Youre obsessed with pedophilia and white women because youre a shitskin from india.Kill yourself and stop spamming your fetish.
y do you have images of naked children downloaded?
>>541151307To upload them on this thread. It's Christian art. You can find these paintings on wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rape_of_Ganymede_(Rembrandt)
>>541151286I'm not the one who made these paintings.
Christian women don't let you get away with playing dumb. Don't let them get away with playing dumb either.A woman ever caught you masturbating and made it as uncomfortable as possible? She caught you quickly pulling up your trousers, she found a toy maybe even for anal masturbation, she saw your magazines or browser history or you dirtied underwear or socks or...And she dragged it out? She maybe even involved other family members?I bet you played dumb. Even though you knew that she knew. It was obvious. But: you knew that you only had solo fun and didn't harm anyone. And you hoped that if you play dumb she will realize this and let go. But some women instead drag that out and involve others.Now look at these paintings here - is there any way at all Christian women don't know? Didn't know back then? They wouldn't let you get away with playing dumb. Christians go to strategy is to play dumb.
>>541151286Have you ever asked yourself how the indians turned out to be the way they are?You get indian scammers if you let people get away with playing dumb. Look at Amber heard - she's white. She looks very white, like could barely be any more white. Yet she acted like an indian scammer.This is the end result of cults with a superiority complex who keep playing dumb.
Cupid is usually drawn blind folded. You grow up with that myth and just accept it as it is.But if you stop to think about it... in this drawing you can actually see the blind fold applied. Doesn't this feel like a bedroom scene? You think adults in the past experimented with blindfolds in the bedroom? And if so... didn't that so very obviously remind them of that?The christians just got away with everything by playing dumb. And if you look at the race mixing (PS: half of Africa is Christian) - it's not just pedophilia.
>>541152683And what are the odds this will instill a fetish in a young boy? Being blind folded by a woman while nude?But then later in life he will struggle to find a woman who's kinky, because he's surrounded by Christian women act as if they'd blush at the mere mention of sex.You look at Christian era art, you easily get the impression that Christian women had kinky sex with everything but men age 20-29. Including swans and very old men. If you assume they enjoy blackmail, it makes sense.
There's also paintings of child satyrs.Given what satyrs were known for... isn't that a bit weird? I know.... we say it's just a myth. They just painted stories..."The writers thinly veiled fetish". If certain things are painted over and over again, at some point it ceases to be quirky.
>repeatedly asks a question he already knows the answer to>on fucking /pol/Are you fishing for compliments? Scared to say it out loud?
>>541153538That it's Judeo-Christian? Islam too though.Islam has Bacha Bazi. All the religions except for maybe buddhism are run by female supremacists. Has been since egyptian times were they began to demand circumcision to enter fertility cults. (and yes, judaism comes out of that area and time too - christianity comes from the desert too. That's why it's a talking snake and not a talking wolf).
>>541153801>no, I'm actually engaging in deflectionOh. Ok then.Too bad for your soul. You almost grasped a fundamental truth.Oh, and by the way...>>541149186That is not a nigger, blind retard.
>>541153883Which fundamental truth?Anyway here is another painting of a nude woman with a nude black child. If you think it's lighting: her feet is right next to his hand. It's not lighting.
>>541153883Here's another painting from the very same artist (Nicolas Poussin). You can tell one child is black here. That child wears a bow and has angel wings. I'm fairly confident that is "cupid". In 1594 they made a bunch of artwork with a black cupid.Very subversive, almost feels like Netflix.
here is one which is more recent, it's from 1933.It features a white girl, a black boy and rainbows.Feels kinda modern. It was painted by Frank O. Salisbury - i think he was kinda religious and conservative.Yet this feels like modern day Netflix.
>>541149186https://youtube.com/shorts/BMsIcmi2yOQ
Here's a painting with nude white women and nude black men. This one was painted 1551. ... Ok. Today Christians bitch about mixed race couples, but between 1500-1930 it was Christian art which was filled with mixed race couples.Almost makes you wonder if people who cause problems then present themselves as the cure to grab power.Or if it's a cult doing an inversion <- like they pretend to be one thing to blackmail people who agree with them. And then they do the opposite behind the scenes.
Many of these paintings sorta portray these children as willing...>>541153801I bet that one is a better representation at what it's like. Now consider that Christians preach all day how sex must be romantic and special. Do you think they have any desire for that at all?They know ideally people would prefer for sex to be both a bit kinky yet also romantic and special. PS: do you think people who mutilate genitals want sex to be special? Or does that actually sound more like resentful losers, crabs in a bucket?I know - Christians didn't mutilate genitals for the longest time. They kinda began to do it in a bunch of countries while mass importing people who do. And they always tolerated a minority who mutilated genitals (it's judeo-christian)
>>541152683I think this sort of thing is symbolizing a woman engaging in chastity and self restraint because cupid (Eros) represents childish or animalistic feelings and chastising him is like putting them aside for the sake of prudence. He's like a cute version of a devil on your shoulder. That's just my interpretation I'm no authority on this.
Why are all Americans schizophrenic?
>>541149343>Netflixgo back retarded Nigger
>>541156453Yes. I can see that. Take a look at my arguments throughout this thread.Christians argued that you couldn't depict adults in a way which was too overtly sensual. That's why depictions of Adam and Eve had to look like a biology book.If you wanted to use a myth to paint something sensual, you would use adults, no? You can bet the following happend: an artist painted an adult woman, and a christian told him it's too sensual. Like: he's painting her ass too exposed. He had to change posture. Redraw that painting. And then... ok people learn patterns. When he began to draw children, he must've said: oh ok these people don't want sensual poses. And then someone said: no it's cupid. He's a 1000 year old sex god. You must draw his ass bigger and it must be more exposed on canvas, like that of a very sensual woman...
>>541149186Is true.The cult Ass-Raped Babies... Still Does.
>>541149186Bump!!
>>541149186>today on /pol/>european art history through the lense of a zoomer gooneri'm here for it. always something new to learn.
>>541157754And mutilates them too!
There's also multiple stories of Transvestite Saints.Women who disguised themselves as a man, then they lived in an all male-monastery. And they did weird stuff like a share a bedroom with their own father.And nobody had sex, officially - ever. That's why they were considered Saints. Because they lived among some of the most educated men and yet never had sex. And nobody thought it was weird they slept in the same room as their father surrounded by men all day despite being a virgin pretending to be the opposite sex.Some were accused of raping their own relatives - but then they just revealed that they were only pretending to be men and were freed of all charges. Also: their father who kept sleeping in the same cell as his virginal daughter who remained a virgin until >40 or so ... he donated lots of money to the poor and church.My personal theory: religion is a blackmail cult which sorta justifies itself by saying they can get away with committing evil if overall they do good in the world. Say: donate to the poor. Like letters of indulgences sorta. But with incest and pedophilia.
Incest prohibition is tge foundation of civiluzation
