no nukes allowed
>>541159008It's war. All is fair in love and war. Nukes will be used
>>541159008>who would winHumanity.
The UK has been taking L's for the last 300 years so I'm going to bet on the other guy.
Canada isn't that dumb, make em the right colorIf not that's step one
>>541159008The US can probably take over Canada pretty quick. And then everything will just stall from there, because any other action requires a naval invasion, and we've seen how pussy the Americans are regarding Iran. Europe nowadays is full of those muslims.
>>541159219ziggers, niggers, sandniggers, jeets and chinks aren't human though
>>541159008>who would win in a serious war?>causing millions of dead white men.Israel mostly. But I'm sure a lot of other shitskin countries would also consider it a great victory to get that fight going.
>>541159008If no nukes, most likely it will end in a draw. USA takes over Canada, but can't invade across the ocean. The logistics of invading across the ocean without already established forward operating bases would be suicide. Then there's the oil issue. Europe would have easy access to middle eastern oil due to proximity, but the US despite being a net exporter of oil, would have issues due to oil quality. Basically US rafinaries rely on foreign oil, while US oil is usually bought by east Asia.
>>541159008>ZOG vs globohomoI'd unironically root for amerimutt zog, I'm just that over eurocucks at this point
>>541159008Every answer is wrong. Just look at the Ukrainian war. Everyone expected Russia to roll them over in a matter of weeks. Didn't happen. How are Europe + Canada supposed to wage war against the US? The fucking ocean won't allow it to happen. Naval capacity and production is shit on both sides. Expect all of the US carriers to get sunk by subs and missiles because nukes aren't a thing. And then what? Mostly transport ships and destroyers? The US isn't invading Europe because it would face 500m+ people. Europe isn't invading the US because it would face 350m+ people. The US is taking over Canada and Greenland. Europe calls it quits and that's the end result. Not sure if they'd be stopped at Iceland. Not sure if they'd care about Iceland. Neither side for that matter.
depends, if there's no ocean in the way?as we are today?probably USwhen eu pulls it's bootstraps an shift to proper wartime economy?probably eu + friendsBoth are irrelevant though, cause you need a naval invasion being on either side, and both blocks are perfectly capable of cucking any such attempt.Unless you already are in war mode and magically teleport all blue block forces to Canada and Mexico to pincer them, it's a moot discussion
>>541159409>>541159454Canada isn't full of peaceful Native Americans anymore. History has taught us that it's incredibly hard to successfully invade your neighbor to the frozen north.
>>541159454You're ignoring the fact that Europe would be fighting a two front war. D-Day v2.0 should be easy enough with the EU being bogged down in Russia.
>>541159562Russia is a post-collapse country that needed a strongman dictator to keep a factory open.
>>541159666>needed a strongman dictator to keep a factory openthat jab doesnt really work considering most of your factories are already closed and moved to China
>>541159666Hi Satan. How's the 40 TRILLION debt looking like today?
>>541159008Two retards with no industry fighting. USA has a better chance of taking the war to Europe than Europe taking the war to America though.
>>541159666>post-collapsenow pre-collapse
I'm sure the jews desperately want a war like this. No-one would "win".>Russian nigger faggots start talking bigthis thread isn't about you and your failure to beat the tutorial nation 5 years in shows how irrelevant your opinion is
>>541159632So does the US still not have carriers and missiles tied down in Iran?
People gas up USA despite being the definition of a paper tiger without throwing nukes around like chimpsThe USA navy is a joke that seem threating to countries with no navyYou know how fucking difficult is to maintain a fucking carrier? Is a bloated messThey can be easily crushed from both Canada and Mexico landwise, the southern states are a bunch of welfare migger pussies and literal niggers along with begrudgely american mutt population, the north will easily side with Canada and Europe anywayIn a civil conflict canada, mexico and the black/latino/asian populations are NOT gonna side with redneck america.In an actual war USA would crumble (like is doing) and an land invasion would be easier than it's ever been in 100 yearsThe only thing keeping together North Brazil is the kike USD and (maybe) being able to like Samsan option actual countries like a seething sore loser jewThe USA will not even be a country within my lifetime and i'm already 40yo
>>541159454>>541159409>>541159008>>541159562I think it probably depends on who starts the war and for what reason because moral and will to fight plays a big part in it. But since exhausting every possible scenario would be senselessly autistic, lets just say for the sake of arguement that Trump attacks Canada and Greenland to secure their oil or otherwise does something that crosses a red line with them.I really doubt that in such a situation the average american would be all that gungho about fighting them. First of all because we prefer killing brown people and have always been hesitant about killing white people and secondly europe plus canada and greenland would probably be much more motivated to fight to defend the sovereignty of those nations. But who really knows, it is entirely possible that europe might wimp out and just let the USA invade greenland and canada because they lack their own domestic support to stand up to us.Im sure the russians would welcome such a great peopaganda opportunity to point their crooked finger and say>See! The yankees are just as bad
>>541159616Canadians and western states of US both have a couple glaring weaknesses. Certain natural disasters inherent to their terrain and the extreme cold is a weakness not an advantage. The bulk of them arent mountain men anymore... without robust utilities they are in for a long hard ride.
>>541159616They would be on our side in the first placeLike who do you think they do more trade with the eu or the biggest western economy on the largest unprotected border in the world?They are commonwealth but psuedo-american empire vassal. We generally have an overwhelming positive view of them, all things considered.
>>541160014They don't even need the carriers. Europe has no navy. >>541160275>I think it probably depends on who starts the war and for what reason because moral and will to fight plays a big part in it"moral" and perspectives can be ridiculously easy to manufacture. It doesn't matter if you look at China, Russia, Europe or the US, the general population succumbs and fully buys into the most transparent, utterly retarded propaganda humanly conceivable. Most human beings are genuinely not sapient.
>>54115961690% of canada is low test timmies
>>541159616Canada's poo'd at every level. You could write a stern letter and take over if you wanted. Wouldn't make much sense as we're already owned by your jews.
>>541159008>great european army
>>541160690>59>62irrelevant numbers to the actual reality we see, which is "your government tells you to die, so you die". There is no "would you", the answer, 100% of the time, is "yes, you will". The real question is "do you want to", which is what the map reflects.
>>541159616Half of us would join you just so we have a free pass at killing the other half, the other half arnt human and can only bitch and moan. EZ-PZ vic
>>541159008A war where? In Europe? Blue Team. In the US? Red Team, obv. In Canada? Very messy, could go both ways but with early Red Team lead. In a 3rd location equally far away from both sides? Red Team, handily.
>>541160690based Finns. Russia is cooked if they try and start shit with Finland.https://youtu.be/QQMUnc0CERE
>>541159008Israel wins by TKO of the white race
>>541159008
>>541160575I dont know. They tried their usual tricks to drum up support for the Iran war>weapons of mass destruction!>terrorist regime that hates our freedom!Ans this time around it just fizzed and fell flat. Even those navy sailors were writing antisemitic remarks on that one ship. I really dont think that after 20+ years of the global war on terror that they are going to be able to whip people into a frenzy like they used to.
>>541161891Now do nato minus the USA
>>541159008US
>>541162198Look I have alot of pride in my family line never really having fought for the govt. But honestly the ONLY way they could tempt me to do it would be a war with: 1. Mexico and 2. Canada.
>>541159008>let's have a look at history to determine that answerseems even when not at war they still lose
