who was right, /pol/ ? was caesar on the right side of history or was he just a tyrant?
>>541162605He wanted to ban usury that says it all
>>541162605He was a left-wing populist whose chief rivals were the Conservative faction in the Senate. If he was around today, most of /pol/ would be calling him a Communist.
>>541162605he was based and the senate was having a textbook failure of democracy exposing the true nature of democracy. it's necessary to government process but insidious, is there a better way?
>>541162605Which of the Ceasars? There's like a hundred of them.
>all take turns murdering Caesar because he's a tyrant>spend the next 5 years fighting over who's going to be the next tyrant
>>541163410You uncultured swine.
Medievals considered Caesar one of just six non-Christian “worthies” from history, the others being Alexander, Hector, David, Joshua, and Judah.
>>541162754It was a hard republic, not democracy in the Greek sense or in the modern republic sense, the municipia and colonies had zero autonomy to make treaties or diplomatize independently so it had little to none semblance to Classical Greek democracies. And the reason was that the Roman Republic's foundation was aristocracy whereas Greek democracy was rooted in communitarianism, it's a vertical vs horizontal model.
>>541162605>sic semper tyrannishe opened the floodgates on multiculturalism and suffrage for nons.
Caesar was pontifex maximus (great priest).Just like Genghis Khan was a grest priest (KHN- kohen means priest in hebrew).Basically jews dispstched genghis khan to crush the white aryan race (jews being negroid)
"Tyrant" is a word used to describe the man who has to come in and clean up the mess made by the grifting self-interested oligarchical families of the republic, whose avarice ran the state into the ground.
>>541166127thanks for spelling it like it's actually pronounced. So sick of plebes saying See-zar
>>541162605Remember that Julius Ceaser was popular and grew to power because he commanded the loyalty of the military, and get got that loyalty by promising rights and support for citizens and not just wealthy landowners. As soldiers were rarely rich landowners, this is was a good deal for them so Ceaser's success was their success. The senate killed him because he was taking power away from rich old fucks to give it to the common people of his nation that actually did the work instead of just sitting on inherited fortunes. We'll never know how much of that he would have really fulfilled long term because he was killed before he could fully enact that plan.
