[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_3772.jpg (433 KB, 750x1086)
433 KB JPG
Do we really all have nigger ancestors?
>>
>>541163193
Some of you. Not all of you
>>
>>541163193
I still look like that
>>
>>541163193
Are niggers closer to her or to humans?
>>
>>541163193
I see niggers who look like that in 2026
>>
>>541163193
I can see where the name comes from.
You're a homo if that gives you an erection.
>>
>>541163290
Niggers are a mixture of Homo Sapien, Homo Erectus, and some other hominid we don't even know about. Eurasians are mixed with with Neanderthals and/or Denisovans, which is also why niggers are so fucking stupid compared to us.
>>
Does it really matter what your prehistoric ancestors looked like?
Does thinking Darwin was on to something change anything about who you actually are as a person living in the present?
>>
>>541163193
That's our collective mother, show some respect
>>
File: 1779224865425655.webm (730 KB, 480x480)
730 KB
730 KB WEBM
no, just you.
>>
File: 1354950787013.jpg (115 KB, 640x426)
115 KB JPG
>>
>>541163193
why stop at niggers? why not go back to eukaryotes?
>>
>>541163193
Ah I can see the resemblance at last
>>
File: 1000005255.png (216 KB, 411x472)
216 KB PNG
>>541163193
If this makes you erectus, you must be homo
>>
>>541163643
This is the villain from the smurfs
>>
Niggers=\= primitive himanoid

Niggers are, just like us, their descendants thou. Our retarded little brothers we don't get along with
>>
>>541163193
Pretty sure I saw her at the circle K the other day
>>
>>541163193
Nah brah, your innate IQ is small because jews not because you're literal ape-like niggers.
>>
>>541163193
If you open a book, you'd know that we have common ancestors with black people. We also have common ancestors with chimps. That doesn't mean we evolved from them. It means we evolved from a common origin. Educate yourself somewhere real, not here or on facebook. Even Grok will do better.
>>
>>541163193
She literally hit the wall millions of years ago
>>
>>541163193
Here's your trad woman /pol/
>>
>>541163193
you go far enough back and sure.
but the reality is that all non-african humans descended from a series of east african homo sapiens migrations across the red sea 50-70,000 years ago. This migration largely replaced a prior migration, circa 100,000-130,000 years ago of a different subset of homo sapiens. The subsequent migration wave full replaced them and there is no evidence of their genes existing in modern humans.

The out-of-africa migrants did mix with various hominids across Eurasia, primarily Neanderthals in Europe and Asia but also Denisovans in Asia and Oceania. Genomic or anatomical variations mean that virtually all premodern hominid ancestry is patrelineal, ie, originating from Neanderthal/Denisovan/other Erectus descendant line males and homo sapiens females. It's not known if this holds true of the West African 'ghost' hominid, which is exclusively present in West Africans (but not Pygmies or Bushmen, who are functionally separate races who were outside of the rest of the human genepool for 100,000-300,000 years).

the first white europeans were Neanderthals, but the gene variation that led to fair skin/eyes in Neanderthals is not the same one present in modern white people, which did not actually develop among the most indigenous surviving group in Europe, the Western Hunter Gatherers, who descended from the Epigravitteans (who had a distinct lineage from the Gravitteans and Solutreans, likely originating in the Balkans/Levant). Genes for fair skin developed among Eastern Hunter Gatherers/Western Steppe Herders originating from the Baltic-Ural area/Pontic Steppe, Caucasian Hunter Gatherers and Early European Farmers from Anatolia.

My personal theory is that it likely developed first among farmers due to vitamin D deficiency caused by a grain based diet at more northernly latitudes, then spread rapidly in northern latitudes due to its competitive advantage (similar to lactose tolerance) but the evidence is currently incomplete.
>>
>>541165652
> you'd know that we have common ancestors with black people
Ok but was our common ancestor a nigger?
>>
Would.
>>
>>541163193
I challenge any man to stand up and publicly proclaim that Donald J. Trump is descended from a nigger.
>>
>>541163708
It wasn't a death bed confession and the photo is fake crap.

Poor old man. He got so played.
>>
>>541163409
Homo erectus is just an older form of Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens descend from Homo erectus.
>>
>>541163193
I don't care as long as I'm not one now.
>>
Partially. At some point in history aliens either interbred with hominids or performed some kind of genetic manipulation using their own DNA, creating modern day humans in the process.
>>
This is just a modern aboriginal woman
>>
File: IMG_3017.jpg (230 KB, 1279x839)
230 KB JPG
>>541166510
> I'm not one now
Are you sure?
>>
>>541166267
See, that never made sense to me, as you can trace all ydna and mtdna haplogroups back to the African origin. I've never seen this addressed. With admixture so common some pockets would've had to survive. It'd be strange if all that's left is the autosomal dna.
>>
>>541163193
That guy was a renowned Cambridge professor. You better lower your tone.
>>
>>541166267
Also I wanted to add my hypothesis as to why anatomically modern homo sapiens replaced relict homo sapiens, while interbreeding with other hominids. Homo sapiens likely had similar survival strategies to one another while Neanderthals et. al. had different niches. Since other sapiens had similar strategies and technology, they became pure competition while other species had distinct adaptations and slightly different resource basis which created more opportunities for trade/exchange.

Incorporation of other hominid individuals, their unique genes (including, for example, the denisovan origin genes in Tibetan populations allowing them to function with less oxygen) and their technologies likely allowed mixed groups to act as generalist populations who would be better able to adapt to the climatic changes of the end of the ice age while older, more specialized/adapted populations gradually died out.
>>
>>541166415
White people aka Cro-Magnon man don’t branch off of homo-erectus, black nigger humans do
>>
>>541163193
No. We had a common ancestor that was probably very chimp looking. We didn't evolve from niggers like they want to say. Unless you consider very ancient hominids niggers
>>
>>541166296
It was more like a small hairy person-like creature. Those are the creatures that left Africa and spread across the world. They also were the ancestors of Neanderthals and eventually all the races of homo-sapiens.
They should have taught you this in High School.
>>
>>541166666
Checked
>>
>>541163193
>Netherlands
>Neanderthal
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm
>>
>>541163193
The out-of-Africa hypothesis has largely been debunked, and it is hilarious that it's still so prevalent in popsci. The power of propaganda is so strong that the hypothesis has become entrenched, and no amount of corrections or counter-arguments will change people's minds.


Not to mention that, although Australopithecus afarensis is younger than Graecopithecus freybergi, I don't see any Jews claiming that we all hail from Greeks.
>>
>>541163566
What I saw as well.
>>
File: 1590358808556.jpg (84 KB, 666x1024)
84 KB JPG
>>541163313
And they're having sex every day while anons on /pol/ will stay virgins
>>
>>541163193
only east asians and other mongloids have homo erectus genes btw
>>
>>541163193
incel chuds would still have no chance with her.
>>
>>541166267
>Genomic or anatomical variations mean that virtually all premodern hominid ancestry is patrelineal, ie, originating from Neanderthal/Denisovan/other Erectus descendant line males and homo sapiens females.
That's the opposite of what Neanderthal genomics suggests.
>>
File: DINDUNUFFINS.png (426 KB, 480x482)
426 KB PNG
>>541163282
We Know, Vermin Kike
>>
File: outofafrica.jpg (84 KB, 845x403)
84 KB JPG
>>541163193
>>
>>541166807
Also they did recently find some archaic homo sapiens remains in North Africa that were 'only' 8,000-10,000 years old which is significantly after the replacement timeline.

Note that the replacement of archaic sapiens also happened in Africa. My personal theory as to why is some kind of behavioral neoteny trait developed in central africa (which is a black hole of evidence due to tropical environment having poorer preservation than arid east africa, and also being a chaotic shithole) which then gradually spread out and replaced all other homo sapiens, again, because they shared a resource base and had equivalent or inferior industries while other hominids had different enough niches to make their replacement/integration more gradual.
>>
>>541166415
They can still be around at the same time
And interbreed
>>
>>541163193
No Modern Humans, Europeans, Native Americans, Asians evolved in the peaceful garden habitat around North Eastern China/Korea.

Some Humans went to Africa and created a de evolved species when they mated with monkeys.
>>
>>541167095
This is a total non-sequitur in terms of human evolution. We have genetic evidence that shows how humans inter-relate and it makes it clear that modern humans originated from Africa, and far, far more recently than the non-african hominins. These do not poke holes in the theory because we have superior evidence that exists in living humans.

OOA is still almost universally accepted among non-crank/ideologically motivated scholars. The only difference now is the picture of how those migrations were timed and how many migrations occurred, how much archaic hominid admixture influences different populations of humans, etc. There's a lot of healthy debate around that but there is no longer a quality evidentiary basis to argue that Europeans, Asians, Africans, etc all developed into people that just coincidentally have very similar morphological traits.
>>
>>541163193
This is just a normal aboriginal woman
>>
Humans evolved in a peaceful garden with no predators, abundant high calorie food and a good climate. The only locations that are candidates are East Asia and Europe.
>>
>>541166950
>They should have taught you this in High School.
Sorry, my only history class was holocaust class
>>
>>541166950
> It was more like a small hairy person-like creature
This doesn’t answer the question. Was the small hairy creature a nigger?
>>
>>541168295
this is retarded rofl, europe was a frozen, arid steppe full of predators and angry megafauna for most of human history.
>>
>>541163193
It's honestly amazing how leftists try to convince everyone that race is a social construct, but if you put an abo woman besides that statue they'd look identical.
>>
>>541163193
Kind of but us non africans mixed with more northern peoples after they migrated there. Same with asiatic peoples they mixed with the peoples in the east. Thats why we look significantly different from subsaharan africans and it looks like a gradiant of change all across northern africa to iran and to the eurasian step there are smaller but still significant differences between all of them. But at the end of the day our ancient ancestors were some nigger looking freaks and savage neanderthal hairy white people
>>
File: 1762989046349601.jpg (78 KB, 512x509)
78 KB JPG
>>541163193
Well, you do, Daquan.
>>
>>541166267
Ancient North Eurasians developed pale skin from living in Siberia. They weren't farmers.
>>
>>541163193
evolution is fake and gay , anyone who believes in it is a brainwashed midwit.
now ayylmao intervention and creation plus hybridization is where it´s at.
a cat has been a cat for thousands of years , it´s not going to suddenly begin talking and growing another tail or bigger brain.
how do you achieve such feats ?
through gene splicing.
now fuck off evolushitters and get rekt for this is the ultimate truth.
we have been created for a reason , and our creators left us.
>>
>>541170580
I have a pollack friend who looks like this
>>
>>541169882
what are you talking about southern europe was a garden
>>
>>541172165
Both evolution and creationism run into the problem of infinite regress. If ayylmaos or Yakub created us, where did they come from? Who created them? And so on and so forth
>>
>>541166922
H. Erectus is why we were able to leave Africa in the first place, they were the first common ancestor to humans that branched out, as other species moved out they bred with H.erectus and then H.sapiens evolved in a pocket in africa and could easily move out from there because so many other hominids had migrated and bred out with H.erectus...
>>
that´s because you only think in human ways , once you open yourself up to spirituality and start to see synchronicities , dabble in the occult , you become very and well aware that higher powers are at play which we cannot and never will comprehend completely.
>>
File: ethnic horrors.jpg (127 KB, 697x1024)
127 KB JPG
>>541172239
Is the 'pollack friend' in the room with you right now?
Don't tell me he works at Nintendo, Trashone.
>>
>>541163193
No, humans come from Atlantis and before that we lived on Mars until the nuclear war which destroyed its biosphere. Well, our ancestors were anyway, maybe our souls are not native to this solar system.
>>
>>541163193
Humans came from Africa, not from niggers there's a difference.
>>
File: I-hate-mondays.png (918 KB, 1256x863)
918 KB PNG
>>541172389
But what if the evolutionary pressure on humans that left africa created genetic changes that africans don't have.

For example, human living where there is a harsh winter would need superior long term planning skills.

Why does all humans starting in Africa change the fact Africans could have fewer evolutionary changes for genes governing long term planning and self control?

Doesn't the fact Africans stayed in Africa prove they're less evolved? The out of africa theory appears to me to prove racists right.
>>
>>541173585
Well that's exactly what happened anon.. some H.sapeins migrated south into Africa, while the ones that migrated north amd out eastward, had a much richer and diverse genetic pool to jump into, that's why we have so many different types of H.sapiens outside of Africa, well specifically sub Sahara... sub Sahara is diverse within its own genetic pool, not nearly as diverse as everyone else.

And I don't think they're "less evolved", I think they're just stuck in a genetic bottle neck.
>>
>>541163193
>Do we really all have nigger ancestors?
maybe you do. Humanity started from several different spawning caves, and gene flow is the most reliable theory for the spreading of certain traits. The out of Africa theory is Jewish anthropology to make up for the decades of "pseudo racial science"
>>
East Asians have the most neanderthal DNA. Is that why they are so ugly
>>
>>541163193
no. but jews do
>>
File: who-farted.png (636 KB, 767x337)
636 KB PNG
>>541173799
Why do you think all evolution is a side-grade?

Some evolution, just by random chance is probably an upgrade, and it's very likely the humans outside of africa got more purely positive upgrades.

Sure, african's "evolved" as much as any other animal, but if they weren't under the right evolutionary pressure, they WAY they evolved won't be as "good" (Good being defined as things like intelligence and self control, etc)
>>
>>541173940
You mean Abbos.
>>
>>541163566
Mix this with a Arab and you get a pajeet
>>
File: alex-jones-wink.mp4 (47 KB, 220x220)
47 KB
47 KB MP4
>>541163193
abbo wandered into the photo there.
>>
>>541174032
Evolution doesn't really have winners and losers, it's about diversity and how a species adapts to an environment.

The people in sub Sahara Africa evolved perfectly for its environments. There was no need to go beyond what they had because everything was fit for their basic survival. And that population of humans down there was never exposed to anything different for a very long time.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.