trying too hard to make it a left right thing
>>541176023Correct, the overwhelming majority (97%) of the population is against the panopticon dystopian hellscape when it is described to them. Its a natural and visceral reactions like looking at maggots in an open wound, only a tiny fraction of the population gets turned on when they look at maggots in an infected wound the rest of the population thinks its gross.
>>541175808It's literally a first amendment right to record in public
If anti-flock people had a valid rational argument, they would make it and wouldn't have to resort to name calling and emotional appeals
>>541176167>>541176187Reminder that Flock-like cameras (ALPRs) are NOT "just automated license plate readers" and they are NOT "just cameras" they are a networked mass warrantless wiretapping and surveillance tool.SCOTUS has repeatedly ruled that mass warrantless wiretapping and surveillance is unconstitutional as it violates the 4th Amendment:>Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)Ruled that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not just physical spaces. Meaning you have a right to privacy even in a public space if your actions are being conducted in a way that would expect privacy (such as speaking in a phone booth).>United States v. U.S. District Court, 407 U.S. 297 (1972) Ruled that the Fourth Amendment requires the executive branch to obtain a prior judicial warrant before engaging in electronic surveillance for domestic security purposes.ALPRs don't just collect your vehicle information and your license plate, they also collect; your gait, your heart rate, your face, BT signals, Wifi signals, RFID signals, Cellular signals, your dogs microchip, your heart monitor, any wearable technology you have, thermal imaging and more.They are a blatant violation of the 4th amendment.
>>541175808Doesn't matterFlock is happening whether you like it or notIts too much of an useful tool for Law enforcement for it to be stoppedAnd it actually reduces crime
>>541176245And you're the one accusing others of being an automated bot?
>>541176293>and it actually reduces crimeno it doesn't, rakshit
>>541176379You have a counter argument or are you just going to seethe? Thought so, nigger faggot.
>>541176293Contdhttps://www.floridatoday.com/story/news/state/2026/08/14/what-flock-camera-where-why-controversial-map-florida-cameras-alprs/91283709007/Automated license plate reading cameras (ALPRs) are growing in numbers along Florida roads and near neighborhoods and businesses.Rule of thumbIf the ACLU is against it, It is a good idea to be for it
>>541176413>AtlantaNo point having tools if you dont use them intentionally or otherwise
>>541176379HAHAHAHAHAHAGood catchSo OP is a leftist propaganda bot
>>541176525>it reduces nigger crime>wait I didn't mean in the nigger infested cities, we have to flood the White communities with niggers first and THEN it will stop the crime.Kill yourself kike
>>541175808How Jewish is Flock? Same question for similar companies.
Why do Flock cameras make leftists seethe so much? Kek
>>541176591Extremely jewish
>>541176581>OP is a leftist propaganda botThey're desperate to not repeat the biggest own-goal in history when they demanded cops all have body-worn camerasThat mistake has led to countless normies turning against them.
>>541176627If flock shills had a valid rational argument, they would make it and wouldn't have to resort to name calling and emotional appeals
>>541176627IndeedFlock Cameras will help apprehend a lot of CriminalsNaturally certain political groups are worried about this
>>541176413so if Flock cameras dont work, why are people so upset with them?
>>541176701OK, give us your valid, rational reason I should give a shit about this? Try to explain how this effects yours or my life whatsoever?
>>541176871Already did itt, its a blatant violation of the 4th amendment and I provided numerous SCOTUS rulings and precedent to prove that.
>>541175808Glowniggers think we are literal downy retardeds
>>541176863They work, just not to solve nigger crime as that was never their purpose.The purpose of Flock-like cameras is to go after dissidents and White males for a Military Draft on behalf of Israel - Israel wants at least 100 million dead White males for the next war with Turkey and Egypt.
>>541176701From Google AIFlock Safety cameras provide law enforcement and private communities with a highly advanced, automated tool to rapidly solve crimes, track suspect vehicles, and improve public safety metrics.Accelerated Criminal Investigations: The automated license plate reader (ALPR) system lets police look backward in time to identify what vehicles were near a crime scene, helping to develop immediate leads even when there is no initial suspect description. According to an initial evaluation published on ResearchGate, early evidence suggests a notable positive impact on overall police case clearance rates.Precise Real-Time Alerts: Rather than pulling over every "small white car," police can input specific criteria to receive real-time hotlist alerts. This drastically reduces public disturbance while pinpointing exact suspects.Recovery of Stolen Vehicles and Missing Persons: Law enforcement agencies like the utilize the network to immediately locate stolen vehicles, recover stolen property, and track vehicles associated with Amber Alerts or missing individuals. Granular Vehicle Fingerprinting: Beyond standard license plates, the machine learning models identify unique vehicle traits, including the make, model, color, and direction of travel. This technology can even detect swapped plates or track the same plate across multiple states
>jeet>quotes Mark Levinpottery
>blatant violation of the 4th amendmentYou are in a public place, on a public road, with no expectation of privacyThe 4th Amendment does not applyFlock cameras also cannot be used to recreate a person's day-to-day life in enough detail to be a violation of privacy, as GPS or cell phone tracking can be usedThey are too infrequently updated and cannot track private places
>>541176916Have you ever read the constitution? Can you tell us what the 4th amendment says without looking it up?Explain how this effects my life whatsoever apart from helping ICE get rid of a few more beaners?
>>541177203>>541177213>Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)Ruled that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not just physical spaces. Meaning you have a right to privacy even in a public space if your actions are being conducted in a way that would expect privacy (such as speaking in a phone booth or having a private conversation in your car).>United States v. U.S. District Court, 407 U.S. 297 (1972) Ruled that the Fourth Amendment requires the executive branch to obtain a prior judicial warrant before engaging in electronic surveillance for domestic security purposes.
Shills have no response to the 4th amendment argument because flock-like cameras are BLATANT violations of the 4th amendment. Here's more: >Chatrie v. United States, 609 U.S. (2026) A RULING FROM THIS YEAR that says law enforcement conducts a Fourth Amendment "search" when it acquires digital location history data via reverse location or geofence warrants, which sweep up location data from every electronic device near a crime scene.>Carpenter v. United States (2018)Ruled that the government acquires a "search" under the Fourth Amendment when it collects historical cell-site location information (CSLI) tracking an individual's movements over a prolonged period.>Kyllo v. United States (2001)Ruled that using advanced sensory technology (like thermal-imaging devices) from a public street to peer into the details of a private home that would otherwise require physical entry constitutes a 4th Amendment search and requires a warrantSCOTUS has repeatedly ruled that mass warrantless wiretapping and surveillance is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and blatantly violates the Fourth Amendment. Flock shills have no argument all they can do is scream "You're a leftists", "You're a tranny", "You're a migger", "You're a nigger" etc.
>>541177257>>541177848All that will be decided in the courtsIf they are unconstitutional as you say the areThen they will face the music in the courtsNow what is indisputable is their efficacy in reducing crimeIn notice you did not reply to my post
>>541177981He didn't reply because all he does is copy and paste the same comments over and over againHe gets paid by the reply, and the past couple weeks this has been a moneymaker for himBut people have caught on to his ploy and now he can't afford his tendies
>>541178047Indeed
>>541176187I have this argument. It is a systemic control that allows for automation of law enforcement. Facial recognition - ticket--. Now you might think okay well I agree with all laws.. However it is part of our judicial system to have a human be able to use discretion --- now there are traffic laws rarely used and criminal laws rarely used-- because of discretion --- if a police officer charged for every charge we are able to do everyday without discretion our judicial system would collapse under the weight it --- Also it would be unjust.These systems will eventually allow for 0 discretion systems. This is the first step.
>>541178256>These systems will eventually allow for 0 discretion systems.Oh I assure you this system will show “discretion” when it comes to policing the Epstein class and their neighborhoods
>>541175808Flock catches criminal niggers, illegal immigrants and tranny pedofiles. ICE said they have used Flock extensievly and have nothing but praise for it.That is why leftsits, trannies, niggers, democrats and other criminal types are so against Flock.
>>541178413Correct
>>541178457I wish I had the gif of him trying, and failing, to drink coffee
>>541178413I agree they will be strangely absent in those neighborhoods and likely inactive or glitched in preferred hunting grounds during specific times.Which then brings up the point of over reliance on them by law enforcement. I happen to think that our judicial system in the west is dead. That it is not longer a system basedon the premise of justice and that we are living in a totalitarian dystopia. >former police/military 30 years
>>541178562
>>541178719Thank you fren
>>541178790Great Pepe
eglin niggers tongue my anus
>>541176617hmmm
>>541175808Seen some video on youtube of flock cameras just aiming at peoples homes or into their back yards and shit, don't think we even have that level of retardedness here most of our cameras are privately owned like companies security cameras pointed at their doors or gates and peoples cameras on homes.
If you support any sort of reduction in privacy period you are a nigger, faggot, or jew. Probably all three. There is no further argument to be had here. There is no point in debating this further. Thank you for your attention.
>>541180434Webm related is an example of a flock camera pointed directly at a womans bedroom window. >Kyllo v. United States (2001)Ruled that using advanced sensory technology (like thermal-imaging devices) from a public street to peer into the details of a private home that would otherwise require physical entry constitutes a 4th Amendment search and requires a warrant
Why do Flock cameras make leftists seethe so much ? Kek
>>541175808The Flock camera are apart of the Anti-Christ system. We must reject it.
>>541177257You're citing court cases you almost certainly did not read. Amendment IV:>The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. I don't feel as any of this is happening to me right now, but then again I live far away from niggers and other mud races so I don't think I've ever seen one of those cameras IRL. But do tell us, who told you to be so outraged about this? Are you 100% sure you came up with this idea all on your own and you're not being manipulated?Try to describe how this is impacting your day to day life?
>>541176187Let me guess, you're 65 years old and have no comprehension of what the system behind flock cameras even does.
>>541184820No, you're a lying jew simping for the semitic surveillance state.
i'm fine with the cameras. throw all law breakers in jail forever
>>541175808All those were me. No bots.
