>Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)Ruled that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not just physical spaces. Meaning you have a right to privacy even in a public space if your actions are being conducted in a way that would expect privacy (such as speaking in a phone booth or having a private conversation in your car).>United States v. U.S. District Court, 407 U.S. 297 (1972) Ruled that the Fourth Amendment requires the executive branch to obtain a prior judicial warrant before engaging in electronic surveillance for domestic security purposes.>Chatrie v. United States, 609 U.S. (2026) A RULING FROM THIS YEAR that says law enforcement conducts a Fourth Amendment "search" when it acquires digital location history data via reverse location or geofence warrants, which sweep up location data from every electronic device near a crime scene.>Carpenter v. United States (2018)Ruled that the government acquires a "search" under the Fourth Amendment when it collects historical cell-site location information (CSLI) tracking an individual's movements over a prolonged period.>Kyllo v. United States (2001)Ruled that using advanced sensory technology (like thermal-imaging devices) from a public street to peer into the details of a private home that would otherwise require physical entry constitutes a 4th Amendment search and requires a warrantSCOTUS has repeatedly ruled that mass warrantless wiretapping and surveillance is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and blatantly violates the Fourth Amendment. And glowniggers know this too (pic related) which is why police chiefs nationwide have told their fellow glowniggers to NOT mention the usage of flock-like devices in their reports and to lie about it whenever possible because they know that any investigation spawned from those devices is fruit from the poisoned tree as it blatantly violates your 4th amendment rights.
>>541178203Freedom from unreasonable search and seizure does not mean freedom from being recorded in public.
>>541178203the only politician thats ever brought up closing 4th amendment loopholes like this is Massie and the miggers were informed by their orange golem god that they hate Massie now.
>>541178384>Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)Ruled that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not just physical spaces. Meaning you have a right to privacy even in a public space if your actions are being conducted in a way that would expect privacy (such as speaking in a phone booth or having a private conversation in your car).
>>541178384>cops running searches on a database without warrant that tracks your every movement isn't an illegal searchokay then i will start recording every movement of jews and politicians across the nation
>>541178203Flock and Axon are both heavily tied to Israel; Peter Thiel is invested in both. Nearly every canceled Flock contract is replaced with an Axon contract ( which was purchased by the Jeffrey Epstein company, Carbyne).
>>541178826picrel Carbyne
>lol
>>541178384Nice try, tranny, I smell your axe wound from here
>>541178853>tracks gov vehicleskek, retardedgov uses non gov plates all the time because of this exact reason
>>541178718you won't do shit shut up
>>541178384>Freedom from unreasonable search and seizure does not mean freedom from being recorded in public.it might.
>>541178203violence is the supreme authority from which all other authority derives.nothing that is done to you is illegal if you won't do shit about it.
>>541179337You wont do shit glownigger faggoteveryone who destroys the panopticon will have their cases dismissed through jury nullification and you will do nothing but whine about it, and direct your glownigger bots to post about it on the internet.
>>541178384bend over and spread your cheeks faggot, you are subject to search because you're in a public forum
