>>541197565OP is mad
>>541197753It's a simple question.
>>541197984genetically no they're not brown but they've historically had brown migrants in their countries, similar to how their are brown migrants in basically all white countries in the modern era.
>>541197984no answers for fat lipped baboon niggers, no sir.
>>541197565It depends. The more pure areas are northern Italy, Galicia, Asturias, etc. the closer to the caliphates the less white. Historical migration patterns prove this. And Andelucia and Southern Italy behaviors and economy.
>>541197565Nordids, Scandinavians, and Celts are archetypal 'White.' They possess very light features (blonde/dirty blonde/red hair) with typically blue, green, or hazel eyes. Some Anglos can be classified as this, too, possessing light/brown hair and blue-ish eyes, though there are swarthy Anglos. Many West-Slavic populations also possess very 'White' phenotypical traits as well, such as blue/green eyes, robust facial features, and light brown/blonde hair, as well as similar cultural similarities in terms of Pagan celebrations and overlapping dietary inclinations.East-Slavic populations, along with some central populations, almost act as a bridge between Europids and Asiatics, in my view. So not quite 'swarthy' White, but a more mongol-white, though swarthy Slavs do exist. Squat facial features, pronounced epicanthal folds, different socialization, etc. Sàmi are Eurasian, for instance, so somewhat of a "bridge" ethnii as well. Not swarthy, but more Finnic/Eurasian mix.As for meds - Italians, Ashkenazim, and in some cases French populations may as well be grouped together. Very similar in a lot of ways. Off-White, or swarthy-White. Behaviorally different. Predisposed to extroversion, as well as different forms of social organization, and diets informed by civilizationally stationary lifestyles. Lots of paternal influences from Moors/Arabs/etc. from historical invasion or inter-ethnic interactions. Any darker than this is mulatto/Indian/Hispanic territory, which is certifiably nonwhite, and at that point you're honestly just descending down the list of nonwhite demographics.
>>541197565Nope. I'm Italian and I'm Whiter than all the German American cucks where I live. But then again, I Lombard Italian. Still, I'm White
americans really are a fascinating species of their own
>>541198194>>541198237>>541198379They were Meds before the caliphates. Were Romans brown?
>>541198440Romans were/are White.
>>541198483They were always Meds though.
>>541197565Yes they were swarthy like the original Yamnaya from 4000 bc Ukraine, it is proven that they mostly had dark hair, dark eyes and none pale skin. Anyways, being white like a Northern European is evil, Romans killed and enslaved them and loved and bred their women because whiteness meant femininity and stupidity as well so white girls were almost always beaten by their Roman masters.
>>541198417>>541198430>>541198440>>541198483The romans were white. Lombards are white. Piedmontese are white, Emilia Romagna is white. Venetia is white, Fruili is white, Tuscans are white, Umbria is white. I’m just saying sicily and Calabrias problem is that. Also why do the Italian police allow African scammers to visably scam people despite being armed to the teeth with Beretta rifles? Are they scared of African migrants?
>>541197565they're yellowish in color like eastasians
>>541198515Whatever that means.
>>541198742The type, it's not pale or ruddy, it's olive skinned. Some might call it brown.
>>541197565Celtic is a larp
>>541198655Yamnaya were genetically more like Northern Europeans senpai. And you can't prove what coloring they had.
>>541198907>you can’tYes you can. This isn’t 2016. And pre steppe Nordic farmers were mostly blonde hair and blue eyes, it’s a myth that aryans made them whiter. They made them darker. Blondism and light eyes is an occurrence of sexual dimorphism and small population.
>>541198440jokes on you, i'm a fat hairy spic jajajajajajajajajajajajajaja.
>>541197565medsnow
>>541198792Yeah they're definitely not pale like snow monkeys.
