[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


IRANNYSISTERS... I DON'T FEEL SO GOOD

https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2026/08/us-navy-unveils-aim-424-malice-lraam/
>>
They'll release the Kidfucker missile soon.
>>
>>541263437
worried?
>>
>>541263356
>air to air
But trump said irannys dont have any airforce
whats the point?
>>
>>541263437
kek
fpbp
>>
>>541263474
It can shoot down other missiles. Also China still exists dumbass
>>
A yes a new MIC toy which isreal will get for FREE (at mutt taxpayer expense).
Thank you mutts, you are my best fren :^)
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=M2rTafbQepg&list
>>
It would be nice if tey send a bunch of those in Ukraine for real combat tests!
>>
>>541263513
It does? Shit we kinda got distracted and forgot slugging it out with a country with no air force or navy
>>
back to /k/
>>
- costs $6594927562349 per unit
- will be intercepted by decomissioned and partially disassembled Serbian S-200 left from Yugoslavia times
- China will copy it and add RGB lights in the process; Israel will be the ones to sell it to China.
>>
>>541263513
i cant find a source which claims it can
>>
>>541263356
>Here's our new missile
>Hey China, could you make more of these for us, we kinda sold off all the factories to you...
Lol, MICniggers are a joke. Also once again this magic rocket will be outclassed by a shitty cheap drone with explosives attached. All this shit is made to win WW2 and the cold war.
>>
>>541263513
That's good, we'll need China to make all this stuff for us. Don't be mad, selling out your nation's manufacturing capacity to the enemy over the course of decades is capitalism. Line went up, aren't you happy?
>>
>>541263513
>It can shoot down other missiles.
Sure thing, yid. Even designated interceptors from something like a THAAD only have a 10% interception rate. Using this for missile interception is cope.
>>
>>541263356

How many does the USA have? 10? Don't worry the DEI raytheon plant will make 5 more in 2 years
>>
>>541263513
>It can shoot down other missiles
Sweet. Another way to spend $50 million to shoot down a $10k drone
>>
back to your /k/ike infested board, you nigger
>>
>unveils
So it might actually start seeing some use in 4-7 years then. Don't get me wrong, really neat stuff. Our military really does have some of the coolest toys, but from what I've seen the pipelines on these sort of things tend to drag for ages. Everything has to be idiot proofed every single step of way and you know what they say about the ingenuity of idiots. Absolutely everything is a process and it takes so long to make everything offical get everyone on the same page and cross all the T's and dot all the I's that it feels like nothing is ever actually new by the time it sees service.
>>
>>541263356
iran doesn't have an air force because it's retarded to have an air force in 2026 so the US have another XXth century useless money pit weapon.
>>
>>541263356
Why would Iran care? They've got like F-14 Tomcats and F-5 Tigers.
>>
File: IMG_0760.jpg (184 KB, 1206x1363)
184 KB JPG
Here are the released specs, I don't know anything about missiles but is this even good?
>>
>>541263356
unless it costs $12 it's a fucking boondongle sapping momentum out of the economy.
>>
File: AIM-424 Malice LRAAM.jpg (3.11 MB, 6605x4403)
3.11 MB JPG
>>541265199
Should be. It fit's inside the F-35's internal weapons bay, too, so it preserves the stealth.
>>
I like the classic aim 54 better.
Eat shit newfags.
>>
>>541265916
>aim 54
Does Iran have any left or did they blow them all in the Iran/Iraq war?

Iran has the only F-14 aces.
>>
>>541263513
I'd rather china take over so at least my taxes will build me a railway instead of going to faggot reassignment.
>>
>>541263356
probably 5 million+ a pop.
>>
>>541263356
Wow, it's literally nothing. The US produces weapons exclusively for profit, meaning that they might make about 100 of these and that's about it. Meanwhile, Iran has thousands of missiles and drones combined. While the US carriers might be at a safe range, their planes cannot get too close without actually risking getting shot down and Iran can always retaliate against the Gulf's infrastructure since they're US allied and hurt everyone in the process this way since it's all about the export of energy anyway.

tl;dr
A waste of time. Either the US nukes them or they call it quits.
>>
>>541263437
Lmao
>>
File: 1729845144490971.gif (2.28 MB, 301x405)
2.28 MB GIF
>>541263437
>>
Its going to cost 1.6 billion per missile, 1.59 billion profit, and they'll make 8 of them per fiscal year. Shareholders of whichever company is marketing these will buy a fleet of private jets and taxpayers will cope as the national debt hits 50 trillion in 2028. Particularly people under 40 who will live a life of austerity to repay the 50 trillion.
>>
>>541266401
this. go post that on /k/ and they will ban you lel
>>
>>541263568
you have that and you are still losing in Iran. LOL
>>
File: 1774417955500571.png (404 KB, 1256x987)
404 KB PNG
>>541263696
>All this shit is made to win WW2 and the cold war.
And? B52 Stratofortress was too and it will absolutely fuck your shit up.
>>
>>541266092
that missile wasn't created to be used in Iran and if you thought it was, you might be a retarded slavnigger
>>
>>541263437
iranian reporting name be pretty weird man
>>
>>541263356
Imagine spending $1.6b per missile and patting yourself on the back.
>>
apparently this missile has a longer range than the aim-54 pheonix. 250 nautical miles vs 100 nm
>>
>>541266856
B1B can carry way more spicy payloads and can do mach 1.2 if need be why didnt uncle sam scrap all B52s and make more of those
>>
>>541263731
You joke, but honestly I don't understand why we don't do this. They already build the critical electronic sub components anyway. If they really want to lower costs at all cost....
>>
>>541263513
>It can shoot down other missiles
no, air to air is for planes. that would be an interceptor missile
the cope man, it reeks
>>
>>541266092
>Either the US nukes them or they call it quits.
This could be said about modern war in general. We're at an evolutionary point where you go full genocide; think nerve agents or nukes, or you get stuck in an unwinnable forever war of drones, snipers and roadside bombs. It's over.
>>
>>541267061
Because fast doesn't matter when missiles are even faster. They'll probably replace B-52 with something like the B-21 Raider because it fits the low cost, low fuel burn, low radar observable and can carry sufficient stand-off capability.
>>
File: 1769376879106963.jpg (28 KB, 720x661)
28 KB JPG
>>541266998
imagine thinking they spent 1.6 billion per missile. why don't you people ever understand even a modicum of the subjects that you are talking about? couldn't you at least do a little bit of research? maybe read a few books? there's absolutely no way in hell that you are White. if you are, then your parents shouldn't have had kids. the fact that you exist in this human plane is a detriment for anybody that is forced to interact with you.
>>
>>541267331
The cost is still well within the millions per unit, accounting for R&D cost and the low volume that is capable of being produced and that was ordered by Congress. Keep in mind the US defense budget hasn't really kept up with inflation, which doesn't help.
>>
File: what.gif (3.17 MB, 406x300)
3.17 MB GIF
>>541263356
>not hypersonic and thus not able to intercept hypersonics
>no other use case
Garbage..

More complete nonsense despite massive funding and carte blanche from DoD.
>>
>>541263356
>air to air
but you said they had no planes left?????
>>
>>541265986
Practically none, but they realised they can't win in an air fight - but they can win economically by destabilising the petrodollar.
They can sit inside their mountains churning out long range missiles for years.
>>
>>541263513
What does it cost vs a 20,000 dollar Shaheed?
>>
>>541263356
>implying we can produce it
New tech doesn't amount to much, when our production is non-existent.
>>
>>541263356
Let me guess. We have like 20 at $15 million a pop to be used on $500 drones.
>>
>>541265199
It doesn't do a lot more than do what we're already good at except better.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.