Why are progressives revising history to make "Woke 1.0" refer to the early 2020s instead of the early-mid 2010s?
That's like their one trick
>>541292427I don’t speak retarded so i don’t understand who “Woke” or “ Ben Shapiro” is
>>541292427woke was what smart niggers used to call themselves. Not awake, because they are largely illiterate.
>>541292427Because they dont want you pointing out their numerous sins.
>>541292427Because they want to put a floor on the rollback.A floor of 2020.In fact we need a floor or 1990.Personally I'd rather 1890.
>>541292427probably when it was the most extreme
>>541292427Woke didnt hit mainstream till the tail end of trump.
>>541292652>smart niggers>communists
>>541292804nigga you sleepin. CIA vented crack
>>541292967spooks doing spooky things has nothing to do with actual policy does it? I always coped by blaming it on spics
>>541293008>blaming it on spicsThat's actually correct. It was the shit at the bottom of coke batches in S. America. Basa, or base. "Based" is derived from it.
>>541293216Right nobody wants to acknowledge spics create a living drug bridge into the US, better seal club niggers in the ghetto, wait what are those flashing lights outside my window
>>541293265IDK. Only the CIA could teach them to add baking soda to coke and boil
>>541293646I got chewed out one time for trying to figure that out by a druggy so idk. Why if you have an overabundance of coke do you make more coke? Doesn't make sense to me
>>541293774I think crack is faster acting, more intense, more addictive
>>541294058If you gotta move more product you gotta move more product, cutting and diluting it doesn't solve your overabundance problem. Doesn't make sense from a business perspective
>>541294213>cutting and diluting itIt doesn't do that. it makes a larger amount of a stronger, more addictive product
>>541292427Because they're retarded. suffrage was woke 1.0
>>541294672Right but on the back end they had too much coke. At least one of the islands down there got the bright idea, well let's make more of it. >And thus they were faced with a serious problem, too much cocaine, in order to get rid of it they made crack>Doesn't that just make more cocaine>...I'm just not cut out to be a drug dealer I guess
>>541292427>why are they incrementally rolling back unpopular social issues instead of rejecting all of them?Because they are just going to do it again, retard.
>>541294827it isn't coke after it's rocked up, usually here in the states. A new drug that you can never have enough of. People really get into it.
>>541295036But think about the warehousing costs!
>>541295125Whore's buttholes are surprisingly affordable
>>541292783woke hitting mainstream and the general populations instinctive disgust reaction was what caused the first election of trump
>>541294752BLUNDER OF THE CENTURY!
