[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1766710048068.webm (3.77 MB, 620x1103)
3.77 MB
3.77 MB WEBM
Flock-like cameras are a violation of your Fourth Amendment rights as a US Citizen.

ALPRs don't just collect your vehicle information and your license plate they also collect; your gait, your heart rate, your face, BT signals, Wifi signals, RFID signals, Cellular signals, your dogs microchip, your heart monitor, any wearable technology you have, thermal imaging and more.

>Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)
Ruled that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not just physical spaces. Meaning you have a right to privacy even in a public space if your actions are being conducted in a way that would expect privacy (such as speaking in a phone booth or having a private conversation in your car).
>United States v. U.S. District Court, 407 U.S. 297 (1972)
Ruled that the Fourth Amendment requires the executive branch to obtain a prior judicial warrant before engaging in electronic surveillance for domestic security purposes.
>Chatrie v. United States, 609 U.S. (2026)
A RULING FROM THIS YEAR that says law enforcement conducts a Fourth Amendment "search" when it acquires digital location history data via reverse location or geofence warrants, which sweep up location data from every electronic device near a crime scene.
>Carpenter v. United States (2018)
Ruled that the government acquires a "search" under the Fourth Amendment when it collects historical cell-site location information (CSLI) tracking an individual's movements over a prolonged period.
>Kyllo v. United States (2001)
Ruled that using advanced sensory technology (like thermal-imaging devices) from a public street to peer into the details of a private home that would otherwise require physical entry constitutes a 4th Amendment search and requires a warrant

SCOTUS has repeatedly ruled that mass warrantless wiretapping and surveillance is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and blatantly violates the Fourth Amendment. We
>>
>>541353149
They are also illegal stalking, you can sue owners of flock cameras for stalking, aiding stalkers, and for mistrials.
>>
>>541353149
>>
File: IMG_0673.jpg (185 KB, 1185x1085)
185 KB JPG
>>541353149
>>
>>541353149
>Daily reminder tha complaining only erects more flock cameras.

Fuck you you fucking criminal. Kill yourself. They keep doing thos shit BECAUSE OF YOU!



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.