You will often see some on here claiming Meds were superior to Germanic Nords because of how the Meds carved some marble statues and shit like that 2000 years ago while the Nords at the time did not produce marble statues like that, nor marble statues whatsoever.But what these retards do not tell you is that the Mediterranean region has an abundance of Marble to work with, but northern Europe doesn't have Marble. So how the fuck were ancient Germanic people going to carve marble statues when they had no marble to work with? The stone of Northern Europe is primarily granite and the like, which is not conducive to carving. You can make some crude shit like stonehenge out of it, but you will never be able to make something equivalent to Michelangelo's David (or whatever). Not unless you had lasers or diamond tipped saws or something, which no ancient people anywhere in the world had.So claiming that Mediterraneans were superior and citing some marble statues they made as "proof" falls flat when you look at the context of the matter. The reality is that Mediterraneans had it on easy mode. They embarked in a mild climate with mild winters, where wheat, graped, and olives grow in abundance and where there was marble to work with. That's the reason why Mediterranean civilization seemed to be more advanced in ancient times. They were running on easy mode.In contrast, Northern Europeans embarked in a harsh climate, with harsh winters, where it was a far more difficult struggle for survival. They carved runestones out of hard granite and people now point at these and say "HAHA! WHAT A BUNCH OF RETARDS FOR NOT CARVING THAT GRANITE INTO SOMETHING LIKE MICHELANGELO'S DAVID!" Well, who could? Show me Meds making great works of art out of granite, you fucking morons (you can't).Also, if you think Meds are superior then explain how so many nobel prizes are won by Northern Europeans and so few from southern Europeans. So take your ancient marble statues and shove it.
Remove all of the Riksbank prizes, then redraw it.
